Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How We All Miss The Shah (Jimmy Carter Caused All Havoc in Middle East Since 1979)
New York Post ^ | September 22, 2009

Posted on 09/22/2009 9:27:55 AM PDT by nickcarraway

SNIP

If Carter hadn't let the Shah be overthrown in 1979, "there wouldn't be this problem in Afghanistan, nor would there have been the Iran-Iraq war," Pahlavi tells Avenue magazine. "Iraq would never have dared to even send a plane over our country. The Gulf War wouldn't have happened, nor would any of the problems of the past 30 years, including the exporting of religious fanaticism."

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: iran; jimmycarter; mhmmdnsm09222009; middleeast; shah

1 posted on 09/22/2009 9:27:56 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Jimmah Carter is off the reservation...always has been.
2 posted on 09/22/2009 9:33:33 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

There are a lot of people who have no recollection of Carter throwing the Shah under the bus in 1979 (Anybody under 50). Every problem we currently have in the Middle East from Afghanistan to Iraq, to the IUsrael/Palestinian problem, to Hezbollah and Hamas can all be placed right at the feet of Carter who by the way was voted the most popular living ex-president. Those of us who are old enough to remember his disaterous foreign policy to double digit inflation, interest rates and unemployment are thankful he was voted out, but he probably should have been indicted for treason.


3 posted on 09/22/2009 9:33:42 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I agree. Jimmah was a one man national disaster and Barrack is not far behind. It will take a 100 years or more to undo the mischief these two arrogant narcissists caused.


4 posted on 09/22/2009 9:35:21 AM PDT by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It’s not like the widow of the Shah doesn’t have a vested interest in portraying the paradise that the Shah would have guaranteed - or that she isn’t engaging in wishful thinking. However, 30 years on, this is rather like arguing about the halcyon empire that would have existed if the Romulans and the Vulcans had never split. It’s more a matter of competing myths and faith than any testable hypothesis.


5 posted on 09/22/2009 9:36:13 AM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The Shah was much preferable to the islamic nutcases running (and ruining) Iran today, but he was not a benign figure by any stretch.


6 posted on 09/22/2009 9:37:10 AM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

This is the single most obscene thing that has happened in my lifetime.

It teaches us to understand what happens when you put an appeaser in the white house.

Sarah Palin may be inexperienced, and McCain and the Huckabees buffoons, but they would NOT have abandoned the Shah or any ally the way Carter did.

And what did Carter get in return? His embassy is taken hostage.

We know now too, that Carter was cozy with the communists.

The worst president ever. EVER. Obama is not far behind.


7 posted on 09/22/2009 9:37:38 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Praying for -16 today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Mrs Carter had the biggest boobs in the nation- Jimmy and Billy

Carter is still the title holder of the worst idiot of a president ever because of that, but Obama is really trying hard to snatch the title away, and just might succeed, depending on how he handles Afghanistan, Paki-Stan, Iraq and Iran.

He may just create a very large, multi-nation Muhammadan alliance of radical, nuclear armed Jihadists with the capability of delivering and nuking us at will, and bring about Armageddon.

That will definitely be the title clincher.

8 posted on 09/22/2009 9:38:55 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

I can’t speak for the all the Presidents who preceded my lifetime, but in that brief span, nobody even comes close to Carter as the worst ever, although the jury will have a lot more time to evaluate the current occupant.


9 posted on 09/22/2009 9:43:49 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
I remember the Carter Presidency well. I remember even our allies were publicly grumbling over how aimless and confused our foreign policy was. To say Carter was a naive fool would be a gross understatement.

I would like to thank Carter for one thing, though. It was because of him that I proudly cast my first vote for Ronald Reagan and helped send Jimmuh packing.

10 posted on 09/22/2009 9:44:45 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Welcome to the Revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The old peanut farmer was a train wreck for the United States and the world, I have come to realize it more with each passing year. That was a very good article which I agree with completely.


11 posted on 09/22/2009 9:46:40 AM PDT by dog breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario
It’s not like the widow of the Shah doesn’t have a vested interest in portraying the paradise that the Shah would have guaranteed - or that she isn’t engaging in wishful thinking. However, 30 years on, this is rather like arguing about the halcyon empire that would have existed if the Romulans and the Vulcans had never split. It’s more a matter of competing myths and faith than any testable hypothesis.

Good point.

Another thing we tend to forget is that Ayatollah Khomeini had a pretty large base of public support back in '79: the Shah was not a very nice a fellow, after all, and his secret police were brutal. The Shah was going to be overthrown. By the time Carter got involved, it was a question of whether or not to keep propping up the Shah, or trying to work with whoever overthrew him.

We can certainly note that the replacements for the Shah were far worse than who they replaced; and they absolutely took Carter to the cleaners, much to everybody's detriment. But let's also be honest.

As for the claims that "there would never have been" these various difficulties with Islamofascism, that's just not realistic. The Ayatollahs were/are products of a wider Islamofascist movement which was going to spring up in much the same way it actually has -- perhaps they would have appeared in Iraq, rather than Iran; or perhaps they would have overthrown Saudi Arabia. They're a culture at war with modernity; their exact location doesn't matter all that much.

12 posted on 09/22/2009 9:47:50 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

“can all be placed right at the feet of Carter”

That mission in the desert. Eagle Claw.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/25/newsid_2503000/2503899.stm


13 posted on 09/22/2009 9:48:43 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

I’m under 50 and was in high school at the time, I remember.

Otherwise, your statement is dead on right!!!


14 posted on 09/22/2009 9:49:41 AM PDT by Springman (Rest In Peace YaYa123)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

Me too!!! My first ever vote was for Ronald Reagan.


15 posted on 09/22/2009 9:51:54 AM PDT by mom4melody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
Carter who by the way was voted the most popular living ex-president.

BY WHO???????

16 posted on 09/22/2009 9:53:21 AM PDT by Marathoner (The Obama health plan made simple: Abort the young, euthanize the old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

The brutality of the Shah’s regime is as much soviet communist propaganda as it is reality. Let’s also remember that it was directed at communists and religious extremists. You know, the ones we are fighting today.

I also do not know that it is a foregone conclusion that the Shah’s overthrow was inevitable. It was certainly inevitable in light of Carter’s mushy fecklessness and betrayals, much like the democratic betrayal of Vietnam.

However the only thing that was truly inevitable is that the Dems are untrustworthy fellow travelers of socialists and fascists everywhere and that they cannot be trusted with protecting American interests or security.


17 posted on 09/22/2009 9:56:19 AM PDT by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Former POTUS Carter was the worst leader of the 20th Century! This article addresses the root cause of all the problems of the middle east.


18 posted on 09/22/2009 9:56:53 AM PDT by 7thOF7th (Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Just as Carter disavowed the Shah to buy friends with his replacement(Ayatollah); Dont underestimate Obamas ability to withdraw
from Afghanistan as a peace overture.


19 posted on 09/22/2009 10:01:39 AM PDT by Beeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

In November the saying was, “There are two kinds of voters: those who remember the Carter Administration and those who are going to find out what it was like.”


20 posted on 09/22/2009 10:02:29 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Don't tell 0bama what comes after a trillion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

“Those of us who are old enough to remember his disaterous foreign policy”

And how easily it is forgotten that the KGB destabilized BOTH Afghanistan, and Iran, in their quest for a Blue-water port in the 70’s....


21 posted on 09/22/2009 10:03:58 AM PDT by tcrlaf ("Hope" is the most Evil of all Evils"-Neitzsche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
It was with Carter's election that I started becoming ‘aware’. Being a teenager of 17 at the time, and still living (at least at that time) with my dad, who owned a machine shop; doing major defense subcontracting. At the time, he and his wife's reaction to Carter's election generated my ‘political’ thinking. Of course, Carter immediately cut the B1 program and it was down hill from there. Foreign policy......handing the Panama Canal over, (where by the way, a massive Chinese military buildup has been going on for years now) to bringing in Cubans that were the criminal element of Cuba which Fidel was only too happy to ship to us. Culminating in the hyper-inflationary period (bought my first home and had 11% interest rate and thought it was a great rate!) and finally, with the over throw of the Shah. But didn't pay attention to that until Khomeini (sp) started hitting the airwaves and then the last straw.....the kidnapping of US Citizens.
So in summary, we can see, that we are very much living with the disastrous decisions made then which are very much long term and on-going. Do we even DARE to surmise the ramifications of this Fascist's decisions and what the world will be like for years to come? And he's been in office only since January and there is already such damage, I can see the damaging results lasting well beyond my lifetime.
22 posted on 09/22/2009 10:04:38 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Hey............How's that Hope and Change Thingy workin' for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Jimmy Carter is Lincoln when compared to Obama. Obama bowing to the King of 911 says it all.


23 posted on 09/22/2009 10:15:39 AM PDT by Mel Lisha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I wonder if all the rumors of huge amounts of aircraft, armor, and other military gear paid for by the Shah's government before the coup and withheld from shipment by Jimmah were true?
24 posted on 09/22/2009 10:32:21 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
Those of us who are old enough to remember his disaterous foreign policy to double digit inflation, interest rates and unemployment are thankful he was voted out, but he probably should have been indicted for treason.

Agreed. It was a nightmare on all counts.

Yes, he threw the Shah under the bus. But I think it needs to be recognized that the history and problems related to the Shah in Iran go back a lot further than Jimmah's time on the scene. The situation in Iran at that time was much more complex than simply whether or not Carter supported him. It had been approaching powder keg status for years. The Shah brought a lot of it on himself, also.

Over ambitious westernization pushed by the Shah, brutal secret police who tortured and murdered, western meddling in Iran for decades which was resented by the population. Carter poured gas on the fire and then made it worse as fast as he could. But he was not responsible for the root causes of the population's discontent. He made it much worse, but whomever was in office was going lose on it, the question being, how badly. Obviously, it would have been very difficult to do a worse job than he did.

Separately, his handling of the hostage situation was criminal and disgusting. Every morning I got up wishing we had never heard of Jimmy Carter.

25 posted on 09/22/2009 10:37:03 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

I went back and read some postings today, and some quick quips from the administration.

Here’s what we have... what do you think?

1. McCrystal perposely leaks his report to Woodward.
2. McCrystal then leaks that he will resign if troops not sent.
3. White House leaks that Obama is reassessing the mission.
4. Growing need for support for his healthcare bill and stimulus package.
5. Obama’s base is crumbling, pulling troops would be popular with this base.

Picture what will happen from a Wall Street Basis if he did this. I think it will immediately result in reduced confidence in this nation by those wishing to invest here and our allies.


26 posted on 09/22/2009 10:37:43 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Praying for -16 today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
The worst president ever. EVER. Obama is not far behind.

Rush annoyed me a bit the other day by qualifying his statement. He said Carter was the worst President in the last 100 years.

0bama is turning out to be a skilled, competitive contender for that title. He may yet win it, but until then:

RUSH - CARTER IS THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER. EVER. Turn up the volume on that cochlear implant so you can hear me.

27 posted on 09/22/2009 10:47:04 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (Maureen Dowd is right. I DON'T like our President's color. He's a Red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: norton

I know we kept the 4 “KIDD” class destroyers that Iran paid for. They were good ships and we used them like they were ours.


28 posted on 09/22/2009 11:07:21 AM PDT by 66-442hot (It isn't smart to kill the golden goose........although now I think they are!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
The worst president ever. EVER. Obama is not far behind.

Also, the worst ex-president ever.

29 posted on 09/22/2009 11:08:44 AM PDT by rock_lobsta (zero is a LIAR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Another Carter factoid. KGB records showed that indeed the Soviet Union was ready to invade Poland in 1980 UNTIL it became clear that Reagan was going to win the election. Then they basically told the Polish Communists that even if they asked them, they would not send in troops. Had Carter won re-election, the Soviets may very well have invaded Poland.


30 posted on 09/22/2009 11:12:15 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 66-442hot; norton

We had also recently sold them some F-14s (with AIM-9s) before the Shah’s ouster but it is said that the American Grummen mechanics removed the advanced avionics before leaving the country.


31 posted on 09/22/2009 1:52:52 PM PDT by lwd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson