Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chapter 3: How Franken's attorneys outmaneuvered Coleman's team to secure the Senate seat.
St. Paul Pioneer Press ^ | 9/19/2009 | Dave Orrick

Posted on 09/21/2009 9:11:28 AM PDT by mojito

Tony Trimble couldn't catch a break.

As one of the lead attorneys for Sen. Norm Coleman following Election Day, he hadn't stopped working in months.

And as he watched the Republican's lead over Democrat Al Franken slip steadily and then finally vanish in the largest recount in American history, he marveled at how everything seemed to be breaking Franken's way. Clerical corrections, countless one- and two-vote shifts from sloppily filled-out ballots, major judicial rulings. They all added to Franken's vote quarry.

In the closing days of the recount, Trimble watched, dumbstruck, as 933 rejected absentee ballots — once the domain of Republicans — were opened and counted. "Franken ... Franken ... Coleman ... Franken."

"I felt like I was in the middle of the desert," said Trimble, a stalwart Republican whose knowledge of election law traced to his childhood in Walker, Minn., where his parents were active in the party and his mother was an election judge during the 2008 election. A colleague concluded Trimble was "traumatized" by the event.

In truth, not every break had gone to Franken, but so many had that it made the difference.

For Marc Elias, a Franken attorney and D.C. heavyweight who had fought to get those ballots opened, what had transpired was merely the manifestation of a post-election philosophy he espouses: "The will of the electorate is going to come out one way or the other."

To Trimble and many Republicans, the Democrats had outfoxed,out-argued, and out-dataed them.

(Excerpt) Read more at twincities.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: 111th; alfranken; franken; lawyers; mn2008; normcoleman
All the bloody details.
1 posted on 09/21/2009 9:11:30 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mojito

Scam.


2 posted on 09/21/2009 9:16:51 AM PDT by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

The unfortunate residents of that state may accept this.

However, if it’s done on a national level, there will be a revolt. And not a pretty one.


3 posted on 09/21/2009 9:17:21 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

I’m sick and tired of being outmanuevered by libs. When do we start outmanuevering these asshats!?


4 posted on 09/21/2009 9:19:40 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito
the Democrats had outfoxed,out-argued, and out-dataed them

Don't they always?

I'm thinking about the Starr investigation, when they had Lewinsky by the throat. They never squeezed her to find out where she got the (suborning perjury) Talking Points Memo in order to work their way up the food chain.

Democrats are wolves. Republicans are lambs.

5 posted on 09/21/2009 9:20:22 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler ("People are idiots." -Thomas A. Caswell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crim

As we saw in Florida, any factor which impairs the ability to repeatedly read a ballot during a recount is going to hurt the majority candidate in that batch more than the minority candidate in that batch, simply because the majority candidate has more ballots subject to being tattered, etc.


6 posted on 09/21/2009 9:20:24 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Love me, love my cat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mojito

“Elias again had proved himself worthy of his status as the go-to gunner for Democrats nationwide. He represents all but a handful of Democrats in the U.S. Senate and has prepared to fight or has fought close Senate elections every two years for a decade. “

Wakey wakey, eggs and bakey kiddies. We have a tactical bottleneck here. This guy goes down, it all falls.


7 posted on 09/21/2009 9:21:24 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Resident Obama: Not a President, not a Citizen, living here but from somewhere else...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Which is why switching to a national popular vote (in whatever guise) would be a curse quite apart from the framers’ intent in setting up the electoral college. All of a sudden a regional recount becomes a national recount.


8 posted on 09/21/2009 9:22:39 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Love me, love my cat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mojito
When it comes to chicanery, no one in the pubbie party or representing a pubbie can hold a candle to a RAT.

The fact that the Bush team was able to pull it off in 2000 is all that more remarkable.

9 posted on 09/21/2009 9:24:09 AM PDT by evad (Spending money that we don't have on something that won't work for a problem that doesn't exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito
“”The will of the electorate is going to come out one way or the other.”

Counting fraudulent ACORN “votes” of non-existent people, is not the “will if the people”.
It's called election theft, and fraud. This lawyer and Franken both should be in jail today.

10 posted on 09/21/2009 9:24:19 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

It needs to be well planned ahead of time.

One obvious thing: Recount methods should be instituted which cause minimal or no damage to ballots.


11 posted on 09/21/2009 9:25:15 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Love me, love my cat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Don’t forget about King County, WA and the election that inserted (yet again) a dem gov. They kept recounting and recounting until they got the answer they wanted. Then the recounts ended.


12 posted on 09/21/2009 9:27:03 AM PDT by stubb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mojito

>> In truth, not every break had gone to Franken, but so many had that it made the difference.

Anything goes when the elections are that close. The attorney should remind himself often that the voters are most responsible for the outcome.


13 posted on 09/21/2009 9:30:04 AM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stubb

And they recounted more times in Pubbie areas, thus destroying more Pubbie ballots.


14 posted on 09/21/2009 9:31:19 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Love me, love my cat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mojito

“Now it was clear: The Coleman side didn’t have clean copies of their own evidence. Campaign workers had marked up their original copies. The Franken team was under no legal obligation to provide their copies ? and Elias wasn’t about to; after all, this was Coleman’s case to put on.”

Huh? Why couldn’t Coleman’s side subpeona that “best evidence”? Something doesn’t make sense here...


15 posted on 09/21/2009 9:31:31 AM PDT by piytar (Zero pimping propaganda on all SRM channels at once: Big Brother in 2009! NRA Lifetime Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
The fact that the Bush team was able to pull it off in 2000 is all that more remarkable.”

Yup.
Bush outmaneuvered the RATS every time. The loony left were angry with Bush, not because they really thought Bush “stole” the election. No. They hated Bush because Bush prevented the loony left from stealing the election in Florida.

16 posted on 09/21/2009 9:31:37 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Yup.


17 posted on 09/21/2009 9:34:17 AM PDT by piytar (Zero pimping propaganda on all SRM channels at once: Big Brother in 2009! NRA Lifetime Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mojito

They lost because they never realized they were in an all out war.


18 posted on 09/21/2009 9:40:26 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie

When we do, they scream bloody murder, like the 2000 presidential election they tried to steal.


19 posted on 09/21/2009 9:41:43 AM PDT by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mojito
I would have have thought that the Florida election in 2000 would have told everyone that the only fail way to go about this is to have a do-over if the tallies came within the margin of statistical error, or alternatively to have the legislature resume its Constitutional role of choosing the Senator.
20 posted on 09/21/2009 9:42:58 AM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

bump


21 posted on 09/21/2009 9:45:28 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

NO one need wonder why Keith Ellison and Betty McGollum always support what ACORN wants and always oppose voter ID in voting...


22 posted on 09/21/2009 9:47:51 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

They started staying up till 4AM plotting this since the day SCOTUS ruled against AlGore. Such is life when you eat/breathe/sleep/live politics, 24x7x365


23 posted on 09/21/2009 9:54:34 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad

Which, IMO, is why they were so angry. They KNEW that they had cheated. The only way we could have won, in their opinion, was to have cheated better.

That’s what P’d them off.


24 posted on 09/21/2009 9:59:12 AM PDT by chesley ("Hate" -- You wouldn't understand; it's a leftist thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mojito
I can't get the whole article to come up.
But from what I can see, it looks like Coleman simply hired the wrong lawyer.

("...his mother was an election judge during the 2008 election. A colleague concluded Trimble was "traumatized" by the event." How much experience does this guy have anyway?)

25 posted on 09/21/2009 10:01:12 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie
I’m sick and tired of being outmanuevered by libs. When do we start outmanuevering these asshats!?

As soon as we get a gob of zillionaires like Soros et.al. to buy the elections for us. /s

Seriously, the Republican party has elites who are pleased to see the Democrat elites take over everything since their goals are identical. Unfortunately, we, conservatives, surrendered long ago before we knew we were in a war or who was the enemy.

26 posted on 09/21/2009 10:03:49 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
"However, if it’s done on a national level, there will be a revolt. And not a pretty one."

In your dreams -'they' are not referred to as The Sheeple for nothing!

27 posted on 09/21/2009 10:04:43 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
The real Ken Starr
28 posted on 09/21/2009 10:06:49 AM PDT by Nephi ( Who is Jane Burgermeister? Clue: youtube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Democrats are wolves. Republicans are lambs.

Democrats are criminals. Republicans are not.

29 posted on 09/21/2009 10:07:37 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stubb

“They kept recounting and recounting until they got the answer they wanted. Then the recounts ended.”

Exactly. And they would have done it in Gore/Florida 2000 if the SCOTUS hadnt shut it down.


30 posted on 09/21/2009 10:19:29 AM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Couldn’t Pawlenty have put an end to this before the ‘Rat fraud machine got fully cranked up?


31 posted on 09/21/2009 10:21:20 AM PDT by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Democrats appoint justices while they are in office, and Republicans allow their justices to be blocked.

IT ALL COMES DOWN TO THE COURTS.


32 posted on 09/21/2009 10:23:14 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mojito
My first big disappointment with President Bush was that he didn't push very, very hard for electoral reform after defeating Al Gore. Based on their recent rhetoric, it would have been hard for the Democrats to oppose ballot reform, ID reform, recall practice reform -- the whole thing.

Voter rolls should be verified, voter ID should be required, ink should be applied to a finger, and primaries should be closed to non-party members.

The fact that neither party really wants the system to be airtight makes me weep for my country.

33 posted on 09/21/2009 10:26:11 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stubb
Thank you for bringing up the 2004 Washington Gubernatorial debacle. It should serve as a textbook example of how to steal an election.

Remember the words of Hugh Hewitt: "If It's Not Close, They Can't Cheat"; The necessary corollary is that if it is close you WILL lose unless you stop their cheating.

34 posted on 09/21/2009 10:49:10 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
The real Ken Starr

Well that explains a lot. It was evident to anyone except partisan Democrats that Starr was not displaying the kind of killer instinct a competent prosecutor would.

35 posted on 09/21/2009 10:56:10 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler ("People are idiots." -Thomas A. Caswell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mojito
The difference is that we have values and want to win fairly. They just want to grab power "by any means necessary". We're looking for rules to follow so we do it right, and their attitude is:

Rules? In a knife fight?

We need to fight fairly but as dirty as needed to get the outcome that reflects the election results, and we need to do the paperwork PERFECTLY so we don't mess it up. The GOP should have specialists whose only job is to make sure these recounts reflect honest results, with no data "lost" by the other side.

36 posted on 09/21/2009 12:06:55 PM PDT by TurtleUp ("Socialist mandates are not a tax"??? Obama, YOU LIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad

In the 2000 election I was a Poll Watcher in Houston, Texas. We needed at least 100 Poll Watchers to cover all of the suspicious precincts; there were only two of us.

Read my report which I posted as my Opus on Vote Fraud. In that election I prevented at least 100 fraudulent votes, mostly people who went from one polling place to the next voting multiple times. 100 fraudulent votes was about 12% of the votes cast that day at my assigned precinct. It does not count the fraudulent votes that slipped past me.

Based on my experience in several elections, at least 5% and possibly 10% of all votes cast in presidential elections are fraudulent. That means that Republicans must win by over 10% to beat the fraud.

Now, not only will the dims cover up the fraud, they will not FINANCE IT WITH YOUR TAX DOLLARS!

Conservatives are incredibly naive if they think fraud is not important.


37 posted on 09/21/2009 12:38:50 PM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
the Starr "investigation" was a mere show.....the real Clinton crimes will never come to light....as probably agreed too....

as far as the Minn sham, rats are shysters we all know that....until pubs start fighting as hard and as devious they will lose...

I am tired of our people being the "good" people and losing...

the "good" people better wise up....

there is no crime in fighting to save America from the evil creeps now running it...infact, its a GREAT and GOOD thing to do so....

the lesson also ought to be to voters....keep voting your stinking third party and you will get the Freakin every time....

so enjoy your Freak Minn...

38 posted on 09/21/2009 1:14:02 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Bush won because he had RAT attorneys.....LOL


39 posted on 09/21/2009 1:15:11 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stubb

“They kept recounting and recounting until they got the answer they wanted. Then the recounts ended.”

They’ve made no secret of using that strategy, and have employed it for decades.


40 posted on 09/21/2009 2:18:49 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
I'm reading an otherwise good book by Daniel Pink called A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule The Future. The book identifies the nascent "Conceptual Age", which follows the Agrarian, Industrial, and Knowledge Ages.

The "otherwise" refers to his chapter about Design as one of the six components of an integrated mind-set. As an example, he states that poor ballot design was the reason that Al Gore lost the 2000 election, citing the "butterfly ballot" (that supposedly gave Gore votes to Buchanan) and one other example. He brings up no examples of poor design working against Bush instead of Gore, but then he admits that he was a Gore operative.

Liberals assume that power is naturally theirs. If they don't get power, then it's Republican evil or just plain bad luck that made it so -- not their policies.

41 posted on 09/21/2009 2:23:06 PM PDT by AZLiberty (Yes, Mr. Lennon, I do want a revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
The fact that neither party really wants the system to be airtight makes me weep for my country.

Agreed. Also, as well as your prudent reforms I'd suggest a flat rule to be implemented across the country requiring congressional constituencies to be required to comply to a single standard around density and shape to prevent or at least minimise the current gerrymandering both parties practice. No more of these farcical ones that are 25 blocks long and one block wide to avoid a clump of enemy voters!

42 posted on 09/21/2009 8:05:57 PM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Androcles

Absolutely. I believe someone has proposed expanding the US House such that each Rep represents 500,000(?) people. I forget what the name of the plan is, but it has some good points. And I agree with you about the oddly shaped districts created by gerrymandering.


43 posted on 09/21/2009 8:17:35 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: darth

I think tour estimates a probably very conservative concerning fraud :)


44 posted on 09/22/2009 4:25:21 AM PDT by evad (Spending money that we don't have on something that won't work for a problem that doesn't exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: darth
I think tour estimates a probably very conservative concerning fraud :)

Good gracious, let me try that again.

I think your estimates are probably very conservative concerning fraud :)

45 posted on 09/22/2009 4:27:26 AM PDT by evad (Spending money that we don't have on something that won't work for a problem that doesn't exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson