Posted on 09/18/2009 1:31:17 PM PDT by RobertoinAL
For all his faults, George Bush had some interesting solutions for the health care problem. Unlike the empty suit we have as President, Bush actually detailed his suggestions.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
HSAs, portability, transparency, revised tax policies, tort refrom. It’s in there.
The big difference is that George Bush was actually interested in health care reform. Barack Obama could care less about health care. His plan is all about amassing political power and government control over people’s lives. That’s why his plan and arguments are so disjointed and nonsensical, he can’t reveal to us what his real goals are, that would give up the game.
And you know, I never remember hearing of this interview. Not even on Fox.
Obama is just an empty suit. His speeches say nothing. But he sure reads a mean teleprompter.
This is why rants about use of the ‘bully pulpit’ are nonsensical; it doesn’t matter if you use it, if you stand there and talk all day and no one does anything w/ it, what difference does it make . . . tree falls in the woods . . . meanwhile, Big Ears is trying to cram a message down our throats that the majority of people obviously disagree w/ and gets all of the help in the world. Without respecting the fact that we’re turning our backs to him in response. Frustrating, but then, this is why so many people showed up on the Mall Saturday:)
But of course, it would be "unfair" to offer these programs to the general public--because they are not near as smart as Congress to know how to use them wisely!
Remember how the Dims howled when George Bush made his suggestion to allow citizens to invest in the stock market?
SHEESH! What hypocrites!
Ping for later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.