Posted on 09/15/2009 2:30:47 PM PDT by knighthawk
Mohammed is now the most common name for baby boys born in London and three other English regions, official Government figures have shown.
The Islamic name overtook traditional choices like Jack, Thomas and Daniel to become the number one name in the West Midlands, Yorkshire and the Humber, and the North West, as well as in the capital, in 2008.
The figures emerged in a detailed regional breakdown of figures published last week by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
it really was nice knowing britain.
Ping
Funny, that was the name I was going to give a pig!
And QEII in a burka.
Brits continued to slit their own throats.
Why does this not surprise me at all?...Not even a little.
Just like Texas... most popular name is “Jose.”
It is NOT doing them a favor by providing so many freebies that they pour in illegally and breed like flies...
We are heading in the same direction. By 2050, one in three residents of this country will be Hispanic.
In just a few short years we will be reading about them in the crime reports!
It doesn’t help that all of the unwed moms like to come up with made-up names/variant spellings, and Muslims have a pool of about five names to choose from.
It is not the most popular name in all of England, apparently. They seem to want to promote it in this article.
#2? Achmed.
This is bad.
UK = skrewed
LOLOL!! The clock is ticking...
Nice observation. I imagine the most popular boy’s name is Colin or William or some such. The ratio of native Anglican English to Muslim is like 6 to 1. But you would never know it by the media. Same deal in the USA with the black white ratios in TV advertisements and free programming vs reality. You would think it was 50-50 based on TV ratios.
Maybe Freud was actually right about something. It seems like Britain really does have a death instinct
Then, we can post the headline: "'Mohammed' is the king of the porcelain throne."
Yes, but by the second or third generation, they start giving their kids Americanized names (among my faves are Brian and Madison Balderama, Leslie Lopez, Fitzhugh Cardoza and Troop Coronado). And their religion doesn’t teach them they ought to be killing us.
Our throat is next. Our pols see as well as we see what is happening in Europe. The virus of Islam is spreading fast in the US and our government is ambivalent. While I will never live to see it, unless something is done I think a world dominated by Islam is quite possible. It will be new Dark Age across the once civilized portions of the earth.
At some point, the worm turns.
The U.S. adds one international migrant (net) every 36 seconds. Immigrants account for one in 8 U.S. residents, the highest level in more than 80 years. In 1970 it was one in 21; in 1980 it was one in 16; and in 1990 it was one in 13. In a decade, it will be one in 7, the highest it has been in our history. And by 2050, one in 5 residents of the U.S. will be foreign-born. Currently, 1.6 million legal and illegal immigrants settle in the country each year; 350,000 immigrants leave each year, resulting in net immigration of 1.25 million.
Since 1970, the U.S. population has increased from 203 million to 306 million, i.e., over 100 million. In the next 40 years, the population will increase by 135 million. Three-quarters of the increase in our population since 1970 and the projected increase will be the result of immigration. The U.S., the worlds third most populous nation, has the highest annual rate of population growth of any developed country in the world, i.e., 0.975% (2009 estimate), principally due to immigration.
87 percent of the 1.2 million legal immigrants entering annually are minorities as defined by the U.S. Government and almost all of the illegal aliens are minorities. By 2023 half of the children 18 and under in the U.S. will be classified as minorities and by 2042, half of the residents of this country will be minorities.
No I don’t we will be a banana republic. Have you ever looked at politics in South Texas? That is our future.
http://www.susps.org/overview/numbers.html
"It is helpful to put current immigration statistics in perspective. With the change in immigration law in 1965, mass immigration levels have drifted upward from 250,000 per year to over 1 million per year. In other words, in one year we accept a number equal to what we formerly took in five years; in two years what took a decade, etc. In response to such concerns a national bipartisan committee headed by the late Barbara Jordan concluded that the numbers should be reduced. A recently released RAND report recommends that the level be reduced.
"It is interesting to see how this plays out in the real world. According to journalist Roy Beck, in California it is necessary to construct a new classroom every hour of the day, 24 hours per day 365 days of the year to accommodate immigrant children. The financial cost is borne by native households, who according to a National Academy of Science report, pay an additional $1200 per year in taxes because of mass immigration. Even so, the primary concern to environmentalists and Sierra Club members is the tremendous environmental impact that will be incurred as a consequence of continued U.S. population growth."
Lets see, just last week, two articles ran that “Mohammed” was the second and third most popular male baby name.
Anyone else see some conflictions in this story and/or within varying foreign media outlets?
What is going on is unprecedented in our history. We cannot assimilate these kinds of numbers. And we are well on our way to becoming a banana republic because of our crushing debt and expanding entitlement programs, which represent an unfunded liability of $57 trillion.
We will increasingly take on the profile of a third world country with a dwindling middle class and a growing gap between rich and poor. We are creating a permanent underclass populated mainly by blacks and Hispanics who have the highest out of wedlock birthrates and school drop out rates.
Hispanic Family Values? Runaway illegitimacy is creating a new U.S. underclass
"Unless the life chances of children raised by single mothers suddenly improve, the explosive growth of the U.S. Hispanic population over the next couple of decades does not bode well for American social stability. Hispanic immigrants bring nearThird World levels of fertility to America, coupled with what were once thought to be First World levels of illegitimacy. (In fact, family breakdown is higher in many Hispanic countries than here.) Nearly half of the children born to Hispanic mothers in the U.S. are born out of wedlock, a proportion that has been increasing rapidly with no signs of slowing down. Given what psychologists and sociologists now know about the much higher likelihood of social pathology among those who grow up in single-mother households, the Hispanic baby boom is certain to produce more juvenile delinquents, more school failure, more welfare use, and more teen pregnancy in the future."
“Mohammed is now the most common name for baby boys born in London and three other English regions, official Government figures have shown”
Britain has lost the culture war and doesnt know it yet. Not even sure if they realise they are being demographically challanged.
Witnessing the Death of Western Civilization in real time, from a front row seat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.