Posted on 09/11/2009 9:26:24 AM PDT by conimbricenses
Perhaps you are forgetting that you attacked me as acting strangely before I made any statement about you.
No. The record shows that you attacked me first. I was responded to that attack.
And ACORN is suddenly timely again in the news. The more it is publicized the better. Simply knowing about it before the election means very little if it is not common knowledge for the public, and Obama’s ACORN involvement is not presently common knowledge.
There is not the slightest hint of a "personal attack" in that statement. You responded to it by mistaking my identity with the other poster, and accusing me of assaulting your character when I had done nothing of the sort.
You also persisted in that mistaken state for 2 subsequent posts where you directed personal attacks at me, and, as evidenced by this latest exchange, remain incorrigible about the same mistake even though YOU AND YOU ALONE bear responsibility for making it.
#49
I guess some people are just dense. And incorrigible even when they are plainly at fault for impugning another, as your mistake of my identity did to me. Most of those people tend to be Democrats, though in you we have an apparent exception. So I suppose that means the original poster was correct to suspect your conservatism after all.
My, my...somebody is just full of errors today.
Me: #3: Not exactly breaking news.
You: #47: And ACORN is suddenly timely again in the news. The more it is publicized the better. Simply knowing about it before the election means very little if it is not common knowledge for the public, and Obama’s ACORN involvement is not presently common knowledge.
Me: #49: Where is it in the news? You cite: "multiple news sources 1982-1994"
You: #51: Right here. http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=ACORN You seem strangely preoccupied with proving to people that you personally knew about Obama's ACORN affiliations a year ago, even though it is not common knowledge in the general public.
I had one typo which was quickly corrected. You have several posts which blatantly lie about my posts. See #68.
NYPIRG is mentioned in here. Didn’t Obama work for a state PIRG, which is a Nader inspired group?
I had experience with the PIRGs back in that era and the professional staffers (I believe Obama was one) were very left wing.
BTW their main issue was opposing nuclear power.
In other words, lighten up, Francis..
I guess I have to post the record again. It is clear that you attacked me first.
Me: #3: Not exactly breaking news.
You: #47: And ACORN is suddenly timely again in the news. The more it is publicized the better. Simply knowing about it before the election means very little if it is not common knowledge for the public, and Obama’s ACORN involvement is not presently common knowledge.
Me: #49: Where is it in the news? You cite: “multiple news sources 1982-1994”
You: #51: Right here. http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=ACORN You seem strangely preoccupied with proving to people that you personally knew about Obama’s ACORN affiliations a year ago, even though it is not common knowledge in the general public.
I acknowledged my error and amended my post. Please acknowledge your error in #63. Thank you.
That is put together very nicely. Can you send that to Beck please?
Acknowledging an error and apologizing to the person it wronged are two very different things. You did the former, but remain apparently incapable of the latter even to the point that you persist in the attacks it spawned.
It doesn’t matter. The time is now. People are listening now, they weren’t then. Keep it up, spread it around, over and over and over. Every single time someone sees it that may not have seen it before, they may begin to investigate, and you never know what they might find on the internet or with boots on the ground.
Part of my intent in posting it here is to get the documentation together in a single accessible place hoping that blogs, writers, and even people like Beck pick up on what’s out there.
It’s breaking news for me - I had no idea Obama was into the whole Malcolm X/black power thing.
_______________
Like you, those statement were new tome or I had forgotten. These things need to be out there every single day. Each time the pop up more people that didn’t know, will become aware. We need to push harder, not stop. I don’t care if something has been posted months ago, post it again, and again. PUSH!
You came to this thread in a state of hypersensitive agitation and preoccupation with matters that entirely miss the point. That state also led you into making genuine personal attacks on a mistaken premise of your own doing, and remains the case as you incorrigibly shirk any responsibility for the way you impugned the character of others. Once again, if that is the case with you there is nothing further I can say or do to help you.
Perhaps if you hadn't attacked me first I would have apologized. But since you made the first attack, the essense of my response (even though not 100% correct in the references) was still valid and you deserved no apology.
At least I acknowledged the error and ammended my post. Now you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.