Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proof: Obama worked for ACORN-affiliated voter registration group in 1992
multiple news sources 1982-1994

Posted on 09/11/2009 9:26:24 AM PDT by conimbricenses

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: conimbricenses

Gotcha! Not that it surprises anyone...but let’s ask him the question again, especially in light of these two videos.

Yes, he does lie.


41 posted on 09/11/2009 10:40:40 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
If you're a conservative you should see this as "breaking news".... did you already know this about Obama?

Yes. His work with Acorn was well known here before the election.

42 posted on 09/11/2009 10:43:30 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Batman11
LMAO!!!!!!
43 posted on 09/11/2009 10:44:47 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. ~ George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SueRae
"Yes, he does lie.

That's not the point! Does he EVER tell the truith? That's the real question.

44 posted on 09/11/2009 10:45:36 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/02/opinion/main4145761.shtml

June 2008


45 posted on 09/11/2009 10:46:01 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2023080/posts


46 posted on 09/11/2009 10:46:59 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

And ACORN is suddenly timely again in the news. The more it is publicized the better. Simply knowing about it before the election means very little if it is not common knowledge for the public, and Obama’s ACORN involvement is not presently common knowledge.


47 posted on 09/11/2009 10:47:36 AM PDT by conimbricenses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses

bookmark & BTTT !!


48 posted on 09/11/2009 10:53:12 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses
And ACORN is suddenly timely again in the news.

Where is it in the news? You cite: "multiple news sources 1982-1994"

49 posted on 09/11/2009 10:54:01 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses

ty


50 posted on 09/11/2009 10:55:49 AM PDT by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Right here. http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=ACORN

You seem strangely preoccupied with proving to people that you personally knew about Obama's ACORN affiliations a year ago, even though it is not common knowledge in the general public.

51 posted on 09/11/2009 11:01:31 AM PDT by conimbricenses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses

I ran across this very interesting ‘Muckety’ map of the former law firm O & MO used to work for. Look at all the companies and organizations they represent! Interesting stuff. If anyone can copy it and put it up....I’d appreciate it!

http://www.muckety.com/7BECFF40501E647D3741343C37265A57.map


52 posted on 09/11/2009 11:04:50 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. ~ George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses
You seem strangely preoccupied with proving to people that you personally knew about Obama's ACORN affiliations a year ago, even though it is not common knowledge in the general public.

No. I was responding to your attack on my character and your question to me. If answering your question is seemed strange behavior to you, perhaps you should not be asking any questions.

If you're a conservative you should see this as "breaking news".... did you already know this about Obama?

53 posted on 09/11/2009 11:10:15 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
It strikes me as if your energy would be spent more effectively if you were trying to increase general public awareness of Obama's ACORN ties instead of trying to increase freeper awareness of your own personal awareness of Obama's ACORN ties. Because that is what you are doing right now.

P.S. It is not an "attack on your character" to make a factual observation about your posting motive. If you believe otherwise then you have issues with which I can offer you no further help.

54 posted on 09/11/2009 11:14:19 AM PDT by conimbricenses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses
It strikes me as if your energy would be spent more effectively if you were trying to increase general public awareness of Obama's ACORN ties instead of trying to increase freeper awareness of your own personal awareness of Obama's ACORN ties. Because that is what you are doing right now.

I made one simple post and you asked me a question. I give you two links in response to your question. Perhaps your time would be better spent trying to increase the general public awareness of Obama's ACORN ties instead of trying to increase freeper awareness of your personal attacks on me.

P.S. It is not an "attack on your character" to make a factual observation about your posting motive. If you believe otherwise then you have issues with which I can offer you no further help.

Generally, on FR, when some one starts with "If you were a conservative ..." it is a personal attack.

55 posted on 09/11/2009 11:18:56 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses

bookmark


56 posted on 09/11/2009 11:19:20 AM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
I made one simple post and you asked me a question.

I did no such thing, and in fact ignored your original post. Another person queried your apparent need to self-promote your knowledge of Obama's ACORN ties, which you answered with a succession of three separate posts thereby showing the frenzied extent of your apparent delirium. You have since mistaken that poster for me, and now twice personally impugned me out of your confused reading of that other person's remarks, which by the way were completely innocuous in their own right and certainly not deserving of the hypersensitive and hyperdefensive response you gave them.

57 posted on 09/11/2009 11:26:15 AM PDT by conimbricenses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses
True. I amend my previous post. No. I was responding to your an attack on my character and your a question to me. If answering your the poster's question is seemed strange behavior to you, perhaps you should not be asking any questions reflect on your motivations.
58 posted on 09/11/2009 11:32:15 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: conimbricenses

Bammy LIES!


59 posted on 09/11/2009 11:34:25 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
The irony here, ColdWater, is that in your delirious state of hyperdefensiveness, you made an even stronger personal attack on my character - and twice over at that - than anything embodied in the original comment to which you purport to have taken offense. You did so completely unprovoked, and solely from your own mistake of my identity for which you and you alone are at fault. And though you now "amend" those posts, the nature of your continued commentary is largely unapologetic and retains the hyperdefensive and hypersensitive characteristics of the original.

And that speaks more to your motive here than anything I or anyone else could ever say about it.

60 posted on 09/11/2009 11:38:48 AM PDT by conimbricenses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson