Skip to comments.
Cass Sunstein in his own words
google videos ^
| April 24, 2
| Cass Sunstein
Posted on 09/07/2009 8:20:10 AM PDT by finnsheep
Our proposed regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein wants to ban hunting, animal agriculture and give animals the right to sue in court.
His notion is that more can be accomplished by tweaking regulations like the Endangered Species Act to achieve his aims than straightforward attempts to give animals rights to sue in court and be represented by a lawyer as he has proposed. Senators Chambliss and Cornyn have put holds on his nomination, but they and our other representatives need to hear from us.
The relevant part is 48 minutes into the video. You only need to listen to about two minutes.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2586700172704318361#
(Excerpt) Read more at video.google.com ...
TOPICS: Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: agenda; animalrights; animalwhackos; bho44; bhoczars; casssunstein; esa; huntingban; regulatoryczar; sunstein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-52 next last
One down, many to go.
1
posted on
09/07/2009 8:20:11 AM PDT
by
finnsheep
To: finnsheep
Where in hell does he come up with these dingbats? They’re dangerous to our freedom. Oh, wait....
2
posted on
09/07/2009 8:21:33 AM PDT
by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
To: Marysecretary
Exactly, all these infantile nutcases.
To: finnsheep
It must be a requirement to be a nutjob to work for the Obama administration.
To: finnsheep
... and up in the White House
an absurd little turd
is popping out to say
Cuckoo
Cuckoo
5
posted on
09/07/2009 8:24:47 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Is it too soon for real conservatives to launch a "We Tried to Warn You Tour"?)
To: finnsheep
Wow. Just like in the Middle Ages, when pigs and goats could be indicted for capital offenses, and got a trial with lawyers. Back then there wasn’t any global warming, either.
6
posted on
09/07/2009 8:24:48 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(www.publishedauthors.net/benmaxwell/index.html, http://sites.google.com/site/thevuzvuz/)
To: finnsheep
“His notion is that more can be accomplished by tweaking regulations like the Endangered Species Act to achieve his aims than straightforward attempts ... “
__________________________________________________________
this is the same idea Obama has about health care, he said just’ give me a sliver and I will go from there.
‘Tweaking’ every little thing until he has exactly what he wanted in the first place.
Beware ‘tweaking’. Do not allow the health care bill.
7
posted on
09/07/2009 8:26:20 AM PDT
by
geologist
(The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
To: finnsheep
So, in Sunstein’s world, if a cat kills and eats a bird, does the bird’s family get to sue the cat? The cat’s owner?
To: Marysecretary
"Where in hell does he come up with these dingbats? I was thinking precisely the same thing. I suspect that the appointment of one nutjob after another is part of the reason for Obama's plunging popularity. These people are so crazy that even the mainstream media is showing glimmers of catching on.
9
posted on
09/07/2009 8:28:37 AM PDT
by
Wonder Warthog
( The Hog of Steel)
To: finnsheep
“We ought to ban hunting”...”It’s time” (about the 49:30 mark)
10
posted on
09/07/2009 8:30:20 AM PDT
by
PGalt
To: finnsheep
Glenn Beck will continue to be a very busy boy.
11
posted on
09/07/2009 8:32:22 AM PDT
by
JPG
To: ru4liberty
Sunstein watched “Mr Rogers” faithfully every day it was broadcast......
12
posted on
09/07/2009 8:34:30 AM PDT
by
Vn_survivor_67-68
(CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
To: finnsheep
"Our proposed regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein wants to ban hunting... I suppose we could always hunt something other than game animals.
13
posted on
09/07/2009 8:34:50 AM PDT
by
Charles Martel
(NRA Lifetime Member since 1984; TSRA rookie)
To: finnsheep
Oh for the days when bad stuff in the White House was idiotic Hollywood types jumping on the bed in the Lincoln bedroom. Obama’s really dragged in the dirty red diapers.
To: finnsheep
So this is the next one in the hot seat? Let’s do it and maybe we can go all the way to the top!!!!!!
To: Wonder Warthog
I’d hate to be friends with the Obamas. I couldn’t sit down in a dinner party with all these kooks. I might grab one of them around the neck...
16
posted on
09/07/2009 8:36:50 AM PDT
by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
To: finnsheep
17
posted on
09/07/2009 8:36:57 AM PDT
by
gibsosa
To: Keflavik76
"It must be a requirement to be a nutjob to work for the Obama administration. "
obama IS the nutjob in the administration...he's got ot have a screw loose somewhere.
18
posted on
09/07/2009 8:39:26 AM PDT
by
FrankR
(We are only enslaved to the extent of charity we receive....INCUMBENTS OUT!!!)
To: Keflavik76
Not really......all you have to do is have a desire to break down the United States and make it a third world country. I honestly believe that Obama’s plans are to lower the middle class of our country down to the ghetto level. He wants to give them everything you have worked for and thereby making them totally relient on him. The biggest problem I have with this.....who is going to do all the work on computers, run businesses, and the list goes on. The ghetto people sure as hell can’t do it.
19
posted on
09/07/2009 8:41:20 AM PDT
by
RC2
(Our Failure is Not an Option)
To: finnsheep
Interesting, folks around here try to call the deer to the stand every fall. ;^) Now you say them deer is getting all lawyered up?
20
posted on
09/07/2009 8:42:22 AM PDT
by
linn37
( "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
To: finnsheep
This practice of using Czars should be outlawed. So Republicans have done it too; kill such practice anyway. I have already contacted my 2 senators here in Ga. We need to start a movement to eliminate once and for all this practice of appointing czars.
21
posted on
09/07/2009 8:43:22 AM PDT
by
gedeon3
To: Charles Martel
"Our proposed regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein wants to ban hunting...It would appear he would also like to see the end of meat eating. Good luck with that one. Who vets these fools?
22
posted on
09/07/2009 8:44:22 AM PDT
by
mort56
(He who would sacrifice freedom for security deserves neither. - Ben Franklin)
To: RC2
23
posted on
09/07/2009 8:45:06 AM PDT
by
Vn_survivor_67-68
(CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
To: finnsheep
Great. That’s all I need. Mice suing me for putting dangerous mousetraps out.
24
posted on
09/07/2009 8:46:32 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: finnsheep
They could not “vet” this guy because it would be animal abuse.
To: nutmeg
26
posted on
09/07/2009 8:48:42 AM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Obamunism is destroying America)
To: Charles Martel; billhilly; CrappieLuck; jazusamo; Grammy; Flycatcher; george76
“I suppose we could always hunt something other than game animals.”
Now that’s funny.
27
posted on
09/07/2009 8:50:12 AM PDT
by
girlangler
(Fish Fear Me)
To: Eleutheria5
Sad to say, we’re already at that point. Several states require a hearing if an animal bites someone. Evidence is presented and if the animal is determined to be “dangerous” then it is put down. Dangerous does not mean that it tore the head off an infant sleeping in a pram. It means that it bit, even if it bit because some fool was poking it with a stick. My former home state of New Jersey had such rules.
28
posted on
09/07/2009 8:50:16 AM PDT
by
sig226
(Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
To: finnsheep
I listened to this video. Sunstein is a real nut case. It isn’t even a close call.
29
posted on
09/07/2009 8:51:04 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
To: finnsheep
Something to think about.
Does Obama appoint these dingbat whackos with the intent that they are red herrings to occupy the conservatives, while he is doing far more devious things.
These whacko czars seem to fall on their swords rather easily to take the heat off of the ONE.
30
posted on
09/07/2009 8:51:13 AM PDT
by
BuffaloJack
(Obama's New New Deal = The Raw Deal)
To: finnsheep
If you do a little more digging on this guy you will see that there are MULTIPLE problems. Sunstein believes that Roosevelt's New Deal did not go far enough and that it is time for the second part of the New Deal. I believe both him and Obama see Obama as the new Roosevelt. In essence, Sunstein’s theory with this book seems an awful lot like communism. And let's not even get started on how he perceives and interprets the Constitiution - lol.
Sunstein has written several books, here are the title of two:
The Second Bill of Rights: FDR's Unfinished Revolution—And Why We Need It More Than Ever by Cass Sunstein
A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before by Cass R. Sunstein
31
posted on
09/07/2009 9:01:09 AM PDT
by
khnyny
(Barack Obama and Van Jones: another one bites the dust.)
To: finnsheep
>> Our proposed regulatory
czar commissar, Cass Sunstein <<
Hey folks, what say we resolve to call Cass what he really aims to be, a commissar.
(Or if you're a geeky purist who prefers the original Russki spelling, комиссар!)
32
posted on
09/07/2009 9:02:53 AM PDT
by
Hawthorn
To: finnsheep
33
posted on
09/07/2009 9:04:15 AM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(CommieCare: Need a Stent, Take a Red Pill. Next!)
To: finnsheep
Remember Ozombie told us to judge him on who his advisers were...frankly, I’ve seen enough to make a good judgment.
To: Hawthorn
Maybe Gauleiter would be another term.
These people must be brain damaged or stupid.Either way they should as far away from places of power as possible.
35
posted on
09/07/2009 9:20:56 AM PDT
by
Yorlik803
( If this be treason, then lets make the best of it.)
To: Wonder Warthog
All of them seem to be ‘over the top’ politically, don’t they?
36
posted on
09/07/2009 9:33:24 AM PDT
by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
To: wafflehouse
37
posted on
09/07/2009 9:42:23 AM PDT
by
wafflehouse
(RE-ELECT NO ONE !)
To: sig226
Sad to say, were already at that point. Several states require a hearing if an animal bites someone. Evidence is presented and if the animal is determined to be dangerous then it is put down. I too hate this stupid bureaucracy. If an animal bites someone it should be shot on the spot, no stupid "hearings". It's an animal after all.
To: Prokopton
I’m not talking about animals that mauled a person, like a pit bull that was trained to be vicious by some crack dealer. The cases in New Jersey were about neighborhood dogs that bit someone for whatever reason. Sometimes the reason was that someone was tormenting the animal before it bit. That didn’t matter in the hearing. They ordered it destroyed.
39
posted on
09/07/2009 10:30:14 AM PDT
by
sig226
(Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
To: Marysecretary
Where in hell does he come up with these dingbats?
Insane Asylums and Detox Centers.
40
posted on
09/07/2009 12:06:17 PM PDT
by
Condor51
(The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
To: Condor51
it DOES make you wonder, doesn’t it?
41
posted on
09/07/2009 12:12:13 PM PDT
by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
To: ru4liberty
So, in Sunsteins world, if a cat kills and eats a bird, does the birds family get to sue the cat? The cats owner? No.. but if it's a RAT.. well that's a different story.
42
posted on
09/07/2009 1:43:05 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: Charles Martel
I suppose we could always hunt something other than game animals. Jeffery Dahlmer's Cousin
43
posted on
09/07/2009 1:45:59 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: finnsheep
Animals SUING????? End Times for sure. Where do these liberal nutcases work before they get into government jobs?? How do sensible people PAY these LUNATICS???
44
posted on
09/07/2009 1:56:21 PM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: finnsheep
give animals rights to sue in court and be represented by a lawyer as he has proposed And if you read his loooonnngg essay on the subject he includes flies and rats as animals.
45
posted on
09/07/2009 1:58:31 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: SandRat
I think you meant “Dahmer”. Regardless, I was thinking more of hunting for “trophies”; the likely targets are probably too stringy and greasy for the table. ;-)
46
posted on
09/07/2009 2:16:33 PM PDT
by
Charles Martel
(NRA Lifetime Member since 1984; TSRA rookie)
To: sig226
Im not talking about animals that mauled a person, like a pit bull that was trained to be vicious by some crack dealer. The cases in New Jersey were about neighborhood dogs that bit someone for whatever reason.Any animal that bites me, for any reason, will be summarily executed.
To: Charles Martel
48
posted on
09/07/2009 3:18:31 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: finnsheep
Obama’s latest nancy boy pick wants to ban hunting. What an idiot.
49
posted on
09/07/2009 3:26:30 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: finnsheep
Welcome to the United Idiocracy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson