Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bruce Bartlett : Why I Am Anti-Republican (Former Reagan domestic policy adviser explains why)
New Majority ^ | 8/29/2009 | Bruce Bartlett

Posted on 08/30/2009 6:50:33 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

I got an e-mail from a prominent Republican asking why I am so anti-Republican these days. Since many of my friends ask the same thing I thought I would share my reply:

I think the party got seriously on the wrong track during the George W. Bush years, as I explained in my Impostor book. In my opinion, it no longer bears any resemblance to the party of Ronald Reagan. I still consider myself to be a Reaganite. But I don’t see any others anywhere in the GOP these days, which is why I consider myself to be an independent. Mindless partisanship has replaced principled conservatism. What passes for principle in the party these days is “what can we do to screw the Democrats today.” How else can you explain things like that insane op-ed Michael Steele had in the Washington Post on Monday?

I am not alone. When I talk to old timers from the Reagan years, many express the same concerns I have. But they all work for Republican-oriented think tanks like AEI and Hoover and don’t wish to be fired like I was from NCPA . Or they just don’t want to be bothered or lose friends. As a free agent I am able to say what they can’t or won’t say publicly.

I think the Republican Party is in the same boat the Democrats were in in the early eighties — dominated by extremists unable to see how badly their party was alienating moderates and independents. The party’s adults formed the Democratic Leadership Council to push the party back to the center and it was very successful. But there is no group like that for Republicans. That has left lunatics like Glenn Beck as the party’s de facto leaders. As long as that remains the case, I want nothing to do with the GOP.

I will know that the party is on the path to recovery when someone in a position of influence reaches out to former Republicans like me. We are the most likely group among independents to vote Republican. But I see no effort to do so. All I see is pandering to the party’s crazies like the birthers . In the short run that may be enough to pick up a few congressional seats next year, but I see no way a Republican can retake the White House for the foreseeable future. Both CBO and OMB are predicting better than 4% real growth in 2011 and 2012. If those numbers are even remotely correct Obama will have it in the bag. Also, Republicans have to find a way to win some minority votes because it is not viable as a whites-only party in presidential elections. That’s why I wrote my "Wrong on Race" book, which no one read.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brucebartlett; democrats; gop; independent
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-123 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2009 6:50:33 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So, he voted for OBUMMER?


2 posted on 08/30/2009 6:53:23 PM PDT by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

McCain wasn’t middle of the road enough for him?


3 posted on 08/30/2009 6:53:47 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

AMERICA AT THE CROSSROADS OF HISTORY

A PETITION ON FACEBOOK FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RESTORATION

A 4TH OF JULY TEA PARTY SPEECH

4 posted on 08/30/2009 6:54:20 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yawn


5 posted on 08/30/2009 6:54:50 PM PDT by GOPJ (Socialism : "Envy" gussied up as a political cause...... David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
All I see is pandering to the party’s crazies like the birthers

The moron went too far with that little comment. What a dolt... and to think he worked with President Reagan? Good heavens he is a kool aid drinker or a closet liberal.
6 posted on 08/30/2009 6:55:28 PM PDT by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paige

He has just lived in the bubble too long.


7 posted on 08/30/2009 6:56:54 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
That has left lunatics like Glenn Beck as the party’s de facto leaders.

Beck isn't a Republican.

8 posted on 08/30/2009 6:58:40 PM PDT by donna (Average American height: (Men 5' 9.6") (Women 5' 4.3") Movies: Reverse!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

KMEFWA, ya RINO POS. Those “extemists” are the center.


9 posted on 08/30/2009 6:59:09 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I think the Republican Party is in the same boat the Democrats were in in the early eighties — dominated by extremists unable to see how badly their party was alienating moderates and independents.

Bartlett contends that he remains a Reaganite.

Then he goes all squishy and condemns the very people are Reaganites.

Bartlett strikes me as a very confused man. But this might explain it...

...don’t wish to be fired like I was from NCPA .

10 posted on 08/30/2009 6:59:10 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Idiots like this rarely give any definitive issue or stance that they stand against. They just moan that they aren’t included and call themselves moderates.

Really, what does this guy care about “birthers” for? If he’s at all interested in a party that reaches out to him, how would one even go about reaching to someone regarding the place of Barack Obama’s birth?

It’s time this guy grew up and started approaching things from a practical take on life. Parties have philosophies. Exactly what is the philosophical stance that bothers him. If he can’t name it, he’s uselessly awash in a sea of meaninglessness.


11 posted on 08/30/2009 6:59:55 PM PDT by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I still consider myself to be a Reaganite... Mindless partisanship has replaced principled conservatism. What passes for principle in the party these days is “what can we do to screw the Democrats today.”.... That has left lunatics like Glenn Beck ...

Mr. Bartlett is no doubt a victim of Palin Derangement Syndrome as well. He will still be stumbling and bumbling about "the extremists" who have taken over his party, when BamBam's death panels are filing his manila folder in the Closed Case drawer.

12 posted on 08/30/2009 7:00:04 PM PDT by workerbee (If you vote for Democrats, you are engaging in UnAmerican Activity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why doesn’t the Republican party just disband?

Does this guy remember that the Dems controlled Congress under Reagan?


13 posted on 08/30/2009 7:01:22 PM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I will know that the party is on the path to recovery when someone in a position of influence reaches out to former Republicans like me.

Mr. Bartlett does not say what policies and principles the Republican party should support to "reach out" to him. Does he have anything positive to contribute?

14 posted on 08/30/2009 7:01:29 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paige
The moron went too far with that little comment.

As far as I am concerned, his commit about Glen Beck didn't help his cause either.

15 posted on 08/30/2009 7:02:18 PM PDT by True Grit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"That’s why I wrote my "Wrong on Race" book, which no one read."

Says it all I think. What a maroon. I think that the Obama administration will/has set race relations back 20 years and I don't think thing will be at all good for the country.

16 posted on 08/30/2009 7:02:45 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Actually, Bruce, there aready are groups like that. The problem isn’t that they don’t exist. The problem is that they suck at doing what you want them to do. I say this not out of malice, simply as a technically correct description of their performance.


17 posted on 08/30/2009 7:04:23 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This guy sounds like those “life-long Republicans” that call Rush and talk about how they voted for 0. Sounds like a member of the McCain-Powell wing of the party.


18 posted on 08/30/2009 7:06:07 PM PDT by ABQHispConservative (A Blue Dog Democrat is an oxyMoron!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This guys kind of republican ran the last time and we see just how well that turned out.Independent my ass.Hows that hopey changy thingy workin for ya?


19 posted on 08/30/2009 7:06:22 PM PDT by imahawk (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There must be another czar opening, he sure sounds like he is auditioning for the part.


20 posted on 08/30/2009 7:06:45 PM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I think the party got seriously on the wrong track during the George W. Bush years, as I explained in my Impostor book. In my opinion, it no longer bears any resemblance to the party of Ronald Reagan.

I agree, but the purge of Reaganism out of the party started with GHWB.

21 posted on 08/30/2009 7:07:42 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hey Bruce, nice to hear your two cents worth. Now go crawl back in your hole for 20 more years.


22 posted on 08/30/2009 7:07:48 PM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Yawn is right...these bores are all the same...as Hussein's numbers fall, their rationalizations are sounding more nutty.
23 posted on 08/30/2009 7:07:59 PM PDT by roses of sharon (Kennedy dared us to call his bluff, when we didn't, he made all of us complicit in what he had done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Still on that mythical quest for the moderate and independent vote. Gee, how did Reagan achieve his historic landslides then? He sure as Hell didn't "move to the center." Bartlett is full of horse excrement.
24 posted on 08/30/2009 7:08:09 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("It (Gov't) can't make you happier, healthier, wealthier, and wise" - Sarah Palin 07/26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Reagan would be ashamed of Mr. Bartlett.


25 posted on 08/30/2009 7:08:16 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative

he was pretty good. I’ve seen some of his stuff from the NCPA


26 posted on 08/30/2009 7:08:37 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Obama acted stupidly...and that's after knowing all the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Who knows maybe he’s more comfortable with Holder, Obmaa, ACORN, and the ACLU. If he is, he needs to move on over to them.


27 posted on 08/30/2009 7:09:18 PM PDT by GOPJ (Socialism : "Envy" gussied up as a political cause...... David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Bad analysis, and I think disingenuous, too.

The Democrats were forced to move a little to the center in the 80's because the were perceived as too liberal, while the Republicans had built a successful center-right coalition.

Now, the Republicans occupy a space a little further to the left than before, while the Democrats have gone hard-left. So, Bartlett's helpful suggestion is for the GOP to move a little more to the left?

I call BS on two counts. One, because his analysis fails to properly identify the current political center of gravity in America, which is still center-right, and two, because I believe his real objection is to the war on terror and the influence of Israel on our foreign policy. He has written a scathing book about the "neo-cons" that all but screams: "It was the Joooos!!!!". Just my opinion.

28 posted on 08/30/2009 7:09:20 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative

at least mccain voted for himself even though Palin was on the ticket. :)


29 posted on 08/30/2009 7:09:57 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Obama acted stupidly...and that's after knowing all the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The party’s adults formed the Democratic Leadership Council to push the party back to the center and it was very successful. “

The center of what, Stalingrad?


30 posted on 08/30/2009 7:10:36 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

He has written a scathing book about the “neo-cons” that all but screams: “It was the Joooos!!!!”. Just my opinion.

ahhh that’s why


31 posted on 08/30/2009 7:10:45 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Obama acted stupidly...and that's after knowing all the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Bartlett sounds like a self serving renegade that feels his self importance has left the building and is trying to get it back. There are going to be Quislings like him in every situation. I have two words that are appropriate for this man, Screw Him.
32 posted on 08/30/2009 7:11:34 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
As a free agent I am able to say what they can’t or won’t say publicly.

That explains the thinking behind the decision by some republicans who have become either "independent" or "libertarian". They don't wan't to be accused of being partisan while being able to express whatever they want, even if it sounds republican. However, there are some who pretend to sound libertarians or independent while holding clearly "liberal" views.
33 posted on 08/30/2009 7:11:47 PM PDT by adorno (Where is Branch 4?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

What a complete idiot.....I guess he voted for Hugo, er I mean zerObambi....


34 posted on 08/30/2009 7:11:58 PM PDT by BamaDi (My new ticket? Romney/Jindal!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
NCPA?
National College Paintball Association?
National Community Pharmacists Association?
National Center for Physical Acoustics?
National Cottonseed Products Association?
35 posted on 08/30/2009 7:12:17 PM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 163)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When I first started reading the article, I figured it was about how he hated the GOP because it had become too liberal and militaristic. Instead, it’s because the GOP is too conservative? Isn’t that a bit like grabbing some raw ground chuck and complaining that it’s overcooked?


36 posted on 08/30/2009 7:12:22 PM PDT by RAO1125 (Neoconservatism:Failed. Socialism:Failing (again). Next up: Libertarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

Yes, it’s funny how he says that in the 80s the democrats were “out of touch”, when in fact they kept winning elections until 1994.

He also believes that the entire 2012 presidential election will be based on the GNP for the year. If that was really the case, he’d be saying that we can only win the White House if we destroy the economy until after the election.


37 posted on 08/30/2009 7:12:43 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What a self-serving jackass.

We went to the middle of the road with McCain, remember - and look what that got us. What would have WON the election would have been a candidate who did exactly what Reagan did in 1980 and 1984 - espouse Conservative values and the greatness of American ideals. McCain did none of that. Why? Because he wanted to present himself as a ‘middle-of-the-road’ candidate, that's why.

This idiot calling himself a Reaganite is an embarrassment.

38 posted on 08/30/2009 7:12:49 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Welcome to the Revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

I agree, this irrational Jew/Israel hating has left these men very confused.

The “stability” crowd is not to stable these days.


39 posted on 08/30/2009 7:12:55 PM PDT by roses of sharon (Kennedy dared us to call his bluff, when we didn't, he made all of us complicit in what he had done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
By the way, Bruce, you seem to be confused about the role of a RNC chairman. Figuring out ways to screw the Democrats is not a horrible distraction from Mike Steele’s job, it is his job.
40 posted on 08/30/2009 7:13:01 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
Does this guy remember that the Dems controlled Congress under Reagan?

They also moved to the right after the 1994 mid-terms, and the 2006 Dems ran as center-rightists. Even Obama talked about tax cuts and stopping earmarks. I just find it laughable when pundits say conservatism is finished, yet you see Democrats run as conservatives to win elections, and then you have Bartlett (and Powell etc) bloviate that Republicans are losing independents and moderates precisely because of the "hard right" (i.e. conservatism).

41 posted on 08/30/2009 7:14:34 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("It (Gov't) can't make you happier, healthier, wealthier, and wise" - Sarah Palin 07/26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
He was also completely wrong about the war. Here is a quote from Mr. Bartlett, dated January 29, 2007:

"In many ways, the war in Iraq is looking more and more like the last days of the Vietnam War. It is becoming increasingly clear that the situation is hopeless and the administration’s strategy is incapable of achieving victory. Yet the president insists that additional resources can still turn the situation around. Although he has little credibility left, many continue to support him in some vain hope that the sacrifices of our soldiers can somehow be vindicated and given meaning."

How's that crystal ball working for you now, Bruce?

42 posted on 08/30/2009 7:14:44 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Paige

>> What a dolt... and to think he worked with President Reagan? Good heavens he is a kool aid drinker or a closet liberal.

I wonder if he’s dating Peggy Noonan? She’s on the same, er, koolaid (or whatever it is they drink or smoke).


43 posted on 08/30/2009 7:15:36 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger

http://ncpa.org/
National Center for Policy Analysis


44 posted on 08/30/2009 7:16:39 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Obama acted stupidly...and that's after knowing all the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Has this man ever been part of a winning campaign? It is difficult to believe that he did anything other than work for someone already in office. Yet his piece seems to be all about him, as if by catering to him a candidate could win an election. I wonder if he could come up with some example of how calling Glenn Beck a nut has won an elction for someone?


45 posted on 08/30/2009 7:17:03 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Who knows? Maybe he also voted for 0 due to some weird tradition, or something. I wouldn’t put it past him.


46 posted on 08/30/2009 7:17:32 PM PDT by ABQHispConservative (A Blue Dog Democrat is an oxyMoron!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Both CBO and OMB are predicting better than 4% real growth in 2011 and 2012. If those numbers are even remotely correct Obama will have it in the bag.

That sounds like a man who might've been jilted and is out for revenge. He sounds like he is hoping for a great economic recovery with Obama being the beneficiary. That's not a former republican who's out trying to help the party. He is out to get even and at the expense of hurting the republicans and conservatives.
47 posted on 08/30/2009 7:18:21 PM PDT by adorno (Where is Branch 4?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The party’s adults formed the Democratic Leadership Council to push the party back to the center....

When someone is this disconnected from reality there is no talking to them.

48 posted on 08/30/2009 7:20:17 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (I miss the competent fiscal policy and flag waving patriotism of the Carter Administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaDi

yeah he probably DID vote for Obama and is probably fighting off his feelings of “how could you do such a stupid stupid thing? Look at obamacare!” that many independents are feeling now.


49 posted on 08/30/2009 7:20:51 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Obama acted stupidly...and that's after knowing all the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
He wrote this as an infomercial for his two books that seem to not sell, he should try QVC.

Bashes “birthers” when they should be called “truthers”.

He's mad because Americans want the POTUS to abide by the Constitution and not what his puppets, the MSM says.

All-in-all I can state that this guy still doesn't get it.

50 posted on 08/30/2009 7:23:24 PM PDT by repubpub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson