Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Off the Wagon [FLASHBACK: Obama apologist and "enabler" Paul Krugman trashes Bush deficits in 2003]
The New York Times ^ | January 17, 2003 | Paul Krugman

Posted on 08/30/2009 5:27:06 PM PDT by Brilliant

Picture a recovering alcoholic falling off the wagon. First he says he can handle a few drinks... But eventually he turns mean...

As a drunk is to alcohol, the Bush administration is to budget deficits.

During the 2000 campaign George W. Bush often pledged to maintain fiscal responsibility... [H]is people said they could cut taxes, pay for new programs... and still pay off most of the federal government's debt...

Now the budget director, Mitch Daniels, has admitted the obvious: The federal government faces the prospect of large deficits as far as the eye can see. And sure enough, the drunk has turned mean. As the administration reaches for another bottle... its officials sullenly denounce the "fixation" on budget deficits...

[T]he administration's ever-changing rationale for tax cuts says a lot about its character... Mr. Bush's promises of fiscal responsibility were dishonest...

The administration's top economist certainly changed his mind about deficits very late in the game. Glenn Hubbard... recently denied that deficits raise interest rates and depress private investments. Yet Mr. Hubbard is also the author of an economics textbook... that... explains how, yes, deficits raise interest rates and depress private investment...

When the government sells bonds it competes with private borrowers... [T]his competition should... drive interest rates higher and investment lower. There are exceptions to economic rules, but someone who suddenly discovers such an exception at the precise moment his political masters need a cover story isn't credible.

Will this alcoholic eventually go back on the wagon? Not for a while; he has too many enablers...

It's O.K. to run a deficit during a recession, as long as the deficit is clearly temporary. But both the numbers and the administration's search for excuses tell us that there's nothing temporary about the red ink...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bds; bho44; bhodeficit; bush; deficit; doublestandard; kennedylegacy; kennedyobituary; krugman; obama; pravdamedia; stalinisttactics; yellowjournalism; zogbyism
Now, Krugman says that deficits are irrelevant. Give him another Nobel.
1 posted on 08/30/2009 5:27:06 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Krugman is incapable of honesty.

This evil rodent is a typical deceitful socialist propagandist.


2 posted on 08/30/2009 5:29:01 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Paul Krugman, you’ve been punked, punk.

Apparently this REDTARD is a big fan of Psychohistory. Figures.


3 posted on 08/30/2009 5:36:59 PM PDT by jdfromny (At what point are we officially "North Americans"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Socialists are incapable of honesty.


4 posted on 08/30/2009 5:38:44 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Kennedycare?Recall that "Animal Farm" begins with a Socialist Revolution to honor Big Major's legacy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Eurasia has always been at war with Eastasia.


5 posted on 08/30/2009 5:45:02 PM PDT by thecabal (Destroy Progressivism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Technically he was right on Bush+congressional republicans’ failure to manage the budget. However honesty, consistency, and playing by the rules are all virtues Krugman’s ilk hope conservatives live by. They don’t realize that the truth will lead to liberty eventually. Liberty is an uphill battle that will always be won.


6 posted on 08/30/2009 6:00:20 PM PDT by ActrFshr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Article was written in 2003, after the deficit had risen to $400 billion because the Clinton recession lingered into 2001 and the damaged economy after 9/11 - at that time Klugman and others were predicting the deficit wouldn’t be reduced to zero until at least 2012 - but in fact because of the Bush tax cuts which got the economy up and running again, the deficit was reduced by approximately $100 billion in each of the next three years, and would have gone to zero by 2008 had not he Democrat induced free-houses-for-the-poor-at-taxpayer-expense blown up - Krugman isn’t scared by deficits now because he’s learned they can be reduced - now all he has to master is the proper fiscal methods needed to accomplish the feat.....


7 posted on 08/30/2009 9:28:39 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson