Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC’s Chief Diversity Officer--New Czar wants Private Broadcasters...to Fund Public Broadcasting
CNSNews.com ^ | August 13, 2009 | Matt Cover

Posted on 08/16/2009 10:24:32 AM PDT by Ooh-Ah

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: olezip

We need to get Our Sarah involved on this one.
She smacked down the death panels, she can smack this one down, too!


21 posted on 08/16/2009 10:40:58 AM PDT by Radagast the Fool ("Mexico-Beirut with tacos!"--Dr. Zoidberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah
Is he talking TV too? This sounds like COMMUNISM to me. Forcing independent businesses who WORK for their money to pay for folks who are gifted with government jobs to spew government propaganda.

SCREW THE CZARS !!

I WANT THEM OUT OF THERE NOW!!!!

GET THOSE FREAKS OUT OF OUR WHITE HOUSE NOW!!!!!

Our GOVERNMENT , our CONGRESS is the one that REGULATES PBS and NPR and THAT IS THE WAY IT SHOULD STAY.

WE ELECTED our CONGRESS

We did NOT elect these CREEPY CZARS!

GET THEM OUT OF THERE NOW.....THE TOWN HALLS SHOULD BE FEATURING THIS TAKEOVER BY UHBAMA JUST AS THEY ARE COVERING THE DEATH CARE DEBACLE.

22 posted on 08/16/2009 10:42:28 AM PDT by Republic (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CA_soon_gone
"has called for making private broadcasting companies pay licensing fees equal to their total operating costs to allow public broadcasting outlets to spend the same on their operations as the private companies do."

Although this is a sinister proposal intended to target conservative views, this sounds like an erroneous description of the proposed fee. Such a fee would be impossible; it would push everyone out of business. I'm guessing the fee would be BASED on total operating costs, not EQUAL TO total operating costs.
23 posted on 08/16/2009 10:42:51 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Lloyd presented the idea in his 2006 book, Prologue to a Farce.."

In 2006 he wrote the book on the Obama Presidential Campaign?? He must be Nostradamus.

24 posted on 08/16/2009 10:46:04 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 (You can never have too much cowbell !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

Does anyone know how widespread so-called “public access” television stations are? These are publicly-funded stations where communities. Seattle has such a channel, which I mentioned in an earlier post. Do most areas have such a channel, or are they limited to a few large urban arear? If they want to expand diversity, they could expand that program, not create onerous and coercive requirements for existing commercial stations.


25 posted on 08/16/2009 10:49:33 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Republicans should go after this one like pit bulls chasing a cat with a T-bone steak tied to its tail.


26 posted on 08/16/2009 10:49:57 AM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

When they pull the plug on the 1st Amendment, we’ll see why the 2nd Amendment was put into place.


27 posted on 08/16/2009 10:55:23 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Forget going Galt. Its time to go Braveheart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic

I used to think that members of congress would be the first targets when the armed revolution begins. Now I think they should probably take a back seat to the czars.


28 posted on 08/16/2009 10:57:30 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Forget going Galt. Its time to go Braveheart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lawgvr1955
Lloyd presented the idea in his 2006 book, Prologue to a Farce.."


In 2006 he wrote the book on the Obama Presidential Campaign?? He must be Nostradamus.



It's early yet, but I'll nominate this for "Post of the Day."
29 posted on 08/16/2009 11:22:35 AM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
Although this is a sinister proposal intended to target conservative views, this sounds like an erroneous description of the proposed fee. Such a fee would be impossible; it would push everyone out of business. I'm guessing the fee would be BASED on total operating costs, not EQUAL TO total operating costs.


One might think that was the case, although in making that assumption, we may be giving Mr. Lloyd credit for being far brighter and more experienced in business matters than he actually is.


Kinda like what happened with Barry Soetoro, aka Buraq Obama, don'cha know? ;-)
30 posted on 08/16/2009 11:28:00 AM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Funny thing is that when the whole Public Broadcasting thing was created in 1948, one of the basic requirements was that any programing broadcast had to be politically neutral. Somewhere along the way, the Left hijacked “public” broadcasting and used it as their own propaganda vehicle, instead of the universally accessible medium it was intended to be.

And now, that’s no longer good enough. Now they want to shut down opposing perspectives through a new Czar! Man, they’re really spoiling for an uprising...


31 posted on 08/16/2009 11:37:42 AM PDT by Tigerized (Exactly what part of "shall not be infringed" DON'T you understand?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MGMSwordsman

More accurately - civil war.


32 posted on 08/16/2009 12:00:56 PM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CA_soon_gone

It is not aimed at every private station but at every private corporation - this is aimed squarely at Clear Channel - the largest syndicator of AM Talk - and they will dump all hosts to stay in business - sic paaseth the Fairness Doctrine by other means.

And make no mistake, this is only the opening shot - Fox News will go down, then followed by the US Internet - for the DUs reading this that means Free Republic et al will be gone.

“Private = public = 0”

Private Corporations = 0. Public = Only what the Communists want us to know..


33 posted on 08/16/2009 12:08:24 PM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

They do no mean that sort of diversity - the whole diversity thing is a ruse any way. They want to make it impossible to have any discussions on radio beyond approved ones - every side in every arguement will have to be represented on every show - how many sides are there to any arguement?

Right - more Hussein’s weasel words. He isn’t lying that way. There is no subterfuge here - you know about the appointment and what the guy stands for, so where’s the beef? It all in the open.

He can’t help what some regulator decides is in your best interest, now can he?


34 posted on 08/16/2009 12:14:15 PM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

“Such a fee would be impossible; it would push everyone out of business.”

Why do you suppose it was included? That’s the point - make radio go back to what it used to be - farm reports, sports, music, weather, news readers, etc.

No it is EQUAL.

Do not give these people the benefit of the doubt - take them at their word. They are counting on you to fudge their words into something you find acceptable, while they go ahead and do exactly what they say they are going to do - go back and read Hussein’s words on the campaign trail.


35 posted on 08/16/2009 12:19:09 PM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dr_who

And do what? They have no power, remember?


36 posted on 08/16/2009 12:19:57 PM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sig Sauer P220

Mass suprise attack on them all - give them no quarter.


37 posted on 08/16/2009 12:20:53 PM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

That’s not what the article says. It says “equal to”. IF this is a typo, then the text of the book or the proposal will say “based on”. But I don’t think this is a typo, anymore than his plan to supervise the content of the programming is a typo.


38 posted on 08/16/2009 1:12:10 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (www.publishedauthors.net/benmaxwell/index.html. Donate to members.tripod.com/tva_israel/HOME.HTM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sig Sauer P220

The 2nd Amendment was put into place in order to deter tampering with the 1st Amendment. Like all deterrents, they’re better at deterring than preventing.

Face it. Shot guns and semi-auto rifles will not work that well against full auto M-16’s, let alone tanks and helicopters. If it comes down to the 2nd Amendment, things will get real bad real fast, and the sunshine patriot and the summer soldiers will not long be with you guys (I’m over here in Israel, and damn glad of it), and will likely turn informant on you. If it comes down to the 2nd Amendment to preserve the 1st, I feel for you all.


39 posted on 08/16/2009 1:18:44 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (www.publishedauthors.net/benmaxwell/index.html. Donate to members.tripod.com/tva_israel/HOME.HTM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PIF

They’d have to make the Internet fall under FCC jurisdiction, which will take an act of Congress, out in the open where it can be talked about—on the Internet even if the new “diversity” czar manages to shut down radio and TV.


40 posted on 08/16/2009 1:22:50 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (www.publishedauthors.net/benmaxwell/index.html. Donate to members.tripod.com/tva_israel/HOME.HTM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson