Posted on 08/12/2009 6:49:59 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
I’m tempted to call this unbelievable but that simply wouldn’t be true. In fact, the very first words of the Times’s piece are “It’s not all that surprising.” Not only do research universities purportedly devoted to free inquiry now censor primary sources in the interest of “safety,” but I’ve experienced it myself: Imagine, if you will, the absurdity of a panel discussion about images which the audience isn’t allowed to view. It’s come to that. This is the scholarship equivalent of Yale donning a burqa to suppress the temptations its immodesty might otherwise inspire in Muslim men. Good work, academia.
Yale University and Yale University Press consulted two dozen authorities, including diplomats and experts on Islam and counterterrorism, and the recommendation was unanimous: The book, “The Cartoons That Shook the World,” should not include the 12 Danish drawings that originally appeared in September 2005. What’s more, they suggested that the Yale press also refrain from publishing any other illustrations of the prophet that were to be included, specifically, a drawing for a children’s book; an Ottoman print; and a sketch by the 19th-century artist Gustave Doré of Muhammad being tormented in Hell, an episode from Dante’s “Inferno” that has been depicted by Botticelli, Blake, Rodin and Dalí…
John Donatich, the director of Yale University Press, said by telephone that the decision was difficult, but the recommendation to withdraw the images, including the historical ones of Muhammad, was “overwhelming and unanimous.” The cartoons are freely available on the Internet and can be accurately described in words, Mr. Donatich said, so reprinting them could be interpreted easily as gratuitous.
He noted that he had been involved in publishing other controversial books — like “The King Never Smiles” by Paul M. Handley, a recent unauthorized biography of Thailand’s current monarch — and “I’ve never blinked.” But, he said, “when it came between that and blood on my hands, there was no question.”
And there you have it. It’s a small mercy, at least, that they’re making no bones about what’s driving this decision; occasionally, this sort of appeasement-by-self-censorship is dressed up as high-minded progressive “cultural sensitivity.” To see just how bad things have gotten, read the entire Times piece (which, thankfully, acknowledges that the paper itself cowered in the face of terrorism by refusing to publish the cartoons when the story broke). Not only were the “expert” recommendations that Yale should suppress the images unanimous, but not a single person quoted in the story offers a full-throated defense of a university’s obligation not to sacrifice knowledge on the altar of totalitarianism. The closest we get is Reza Aslan arguing that it’s “idiotic” to omit the cartoons now that the controversy’s died down and the risk of reprisal is low. If the risk was high, presumably he’d think differently. In lieu of an exit question, let me make a recommendation: If you know a right-wing academic or public intellectual, make sure to bring this item to his or her attention. Hopefully it’ll make them think twice about doing business with Yale in the future.
Terror appeasers.
I believe.....FERVENTLY....in ‘mo ham’.
I have a penchant for bacon. Seriously.
As if a right winger would ever want to do business with Yale before this?
To be fair, I’m sure they are busy purging all cartoon books relating to Christianity as well. /s
cowards, really.
What ever happened to free speech liberals?
OKay, I’m choking with laughter
free inquiry??
did they say it with a straight face?
Their mind was made up before hand and they sought out "experts" that they knew agreed.
1701: Ten Congregationalist ministers, out of “zeal for upholding and propagating of the Christian Protestant Religion,” found the college later named Yale.
but apparently noone disagrees. Nobody in the country apparently. They couldn’t find one anyway.
laugh riot
I will say one thing - Muslims understand liberal elites. They’re cowards - and the cave quickly.
I will say one thing - Muslims understand liberal elites. They’re cowards - and they cave quickly.
Yale...too anal for words.
Of course, NYT et.al, had no problem posting the inflamatory Abu Ghraib pictures, over and over and over and over...
Will they burn all of their ancient manuscripts next?
I would suspect they'll try burning the main library on Yale campus next.
I would suspect they'll try burning the main library on Yale campus next.
I wonder if they’ve removed the cartoons from their copy of “pickaninnies”?
COWARDS ALL!
''There is no G-d but Al-lah, so says Yale.''
Absolutely hilarious!!! ROFLMAO!!! Uzzlims = 0bozos
Great statement & absolutely true!!! Their search for intellectual honesty & integrity & courage evaporates instantly when it comes to anything critical of uzzlims!!!
What a bunch of cowardly weenies!!!!
.
Congressman Billybob
your-great-learning-has-made-you-mad alert.
ON THE INTERNET:
http://www.truthusa.com/MoreThanCartoons.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/cartoonjihad/index
Apparently the staff of Yale University Press weren’t really interested in having a guy with a vest bomb run into their offices screaming “Allahu Akhbar!”.
Self-preservation (rather than the desire not to offend) seems to have ruled their decision-making.
Goes to show. If conservatives ever want to take over Universities, all we have to do is threaten to knock off a few asshats. Otherwise, they are petty dictators.
This is a sad time for us Yale Alums.
Yep, our "intellectual elite" are only brave when the object of their score can't fight back. There's a lesson in here somewhere...
http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=35944
“Yale’s Surrender”
By: Winfield Myers
Campus Watch | Monday, August 17, 2009
SNIPPET: “Yesterday’s New York Times reported Yale University Press’s (YUP) decision to pull both the Danish cartoons of Muhammad along with all other illustrations of him slated to appear in Klausen’s book, which examines—remarkably—the very controversy the 12 cartoons sparked in 2006, five months after their publication in the Danish newspaper Jylland- Posten in September, 2005.
The Times said that YUP and Yale University “consulted two dozen authorities, including diplomats and experts on Islam and counterterrorism, and the recommendation was unanimous” that no illustrations should appear. It quotes John Donatich, YUP’s director, as saying the experts recommendation to withdraw all images of Muhammad was “overwhelming and unanimous.”
Not only is Yale withholding the identity of the experts from the public; it refused to share them with Klausen herself. According to the Times, Klausen was told she could read a summary of the experts’ opinions “only if she signed a confidentiality agreement that forbade her from talking about them.” She refused and called it a “gag order.”
A Yale spokeswoman added that some experts wished originally to keep their identities secret, although some “subsequently agreed to be identified.””
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.