Skip to comments.
Charles Johnson of LGF supports violence against American citizens.
Posted on 08/08/2009 10:14:58 AM PDT by pmedia
I will not link to his site but the slimeball Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs IS BLAMING AMERICAN CITIZENS FOR VIOLENCE BEING PERPETRATED AGAINST THEM.
This racist bigot has posted hateful things about arabs & muslims for years (not just terrorists but all muslims). Violence is wrong!
Now surprise surprise when a black man is beaten & hospitalized in St. Louis by SEIU thugs and a cancer patient and business man are assaulted in Tampa by SEIU thugs it's their own fault.
This man has a DEFECT and it's sick that any conservative EVER listened to him just because the United States was in an armed conflict (that was correct) and he gets off watching innocent people get hurt. Violence is wrong!
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: charlesjohnson; charlesjohnsonnut; charrliethewackjob; doodoosniffer; kittenfodder; kittychow; lgf; lgfnarcissist; meowmix; newbie; newbiewithavanity; racists; sniff; teaparty; townhall; troll; trollsonparade; valhallaiamcoming; victorkilo; vk; wackos; weareyouroverlords; zot; zotbait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200, 201-218 next last
1
posted on
08/08/2009 10:14:58 AM PDT
by
pmedia
To: pmedia; darkwing104; 50mm; Old Sarge
To: pmedia
3
posted on
08/08/2009 10:17:14 AM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(Many lge corp. successes started with a sm bus., an entrepreneur & a dream. 0 is killing that dream)
To: pmedia
Welcome to Free Republic?
IBTZ?
To: pmedia
Yep. The guy never has been a conservative but just a hateful nag.
5
posted on
08/08/2009 10:17:43 AM PDT
by
armymarinemom
(My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
To: pmedia
Johnson is a liberal who only hates muslims because muslims aren’t particularly liberal on social issues.
To: rabscuttle385
7
posted on
08/08/2009 10:17:58 AM PDT
by
ErnBatavia
(Impeach now....not next month... now)
To: pmedia
I don’t like screaming NOOBIE, but August 8, 2009? No link? No page? Get on out.
To: pmedia
pmedia
Since Aug 8, 2009
Welcome to FR ...
9
posted on
08/08/2009 10:18:32 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: pmedia; darkangel82; fieldmarshaldj; hiredhand
And you signed up today just to tell us this?
This VK’s whiskers are tingling.
To: pmedia
CJ’s LGF used to be good reading. Not anymore.
11
posted on
08/08/2009 10:18:40 AM PDT
by
PGalt
To: pmedia
Do you have a quote so we can make a search? This sounds far-fetched.
12
posted on
08/08/2009 10:19:57 AM PDT
by
Rocko
(Mymindisaragingtorrent,floodedwithrivuletsofthoughtcascadingintoawaterfallofcreativealternatives.)
To: pmedia
The last thing that LGF did that was relevant was during the Dan Rather TANG memo exposure. I haven’t been there in a very long time although I guess I still have a account. I guess I haven’t been back to find out. He isn’t worth the support as far as I’m concerned.
13
posted on
08/08/2009 10:19:59 AM PDT
by
federal
To: PGalt
CJ banned Pamela Gellar of Atlas Shrugs as well as many other reasonable people. CJ is a pinko who doesn’t like the fact that muslims hate abortion and gay marriage.
To: pmedia
I thought LGF stood for Lesbian and Gay Friends...
15
posted on
08/08/2009 10:20:20 AM PDT
by
jessduntno
("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction." - Ronald Reagan)
To: pmedia
I went to LGF, and now that I'm out of the shower, I think you have grossly misrepresented CJ's post. He is just being his usual RINO idiot self in decrying what he calls mob behavior at the townhalls, but he in no way supported violence. Unless you can provide substatiation for your claims by a link and an excerpt, this post will be pulled.
Oh, and the racism claim was really lame as well.
To: Admin Moderator
Oh, can we at least play with the troll? LOL.
To: pmedia
WELCOME to Free Republic!
Thanks for posting. I wasn’t aware that this kind of crap was published on LGF.
To: rabscuttle385
Go ahead and bat him around a bit while we wait.
To: Admin Moderator
To: pmedia
I think you're on the wrong website. You meant to post this to Democrat Underground, didn't you?
IBTZ!
21
posted on
08/08/2009 10:22:16 AM PDT
by
SW6906
(6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
To: rabscuttle385
“Oh, can we at least play with the troll? LOL.”
Oh yes, please.
To: FreeSouthernAmerican
No page? No page is the signature not just of newbies but of our nastier sorts here
most are simply disingenuous
23
posted on
08/08/2009 10:23:13 AM PDT
by
wardaddy
(ASAP, as southern as possible.......Sarah Palin, i love you)
To: American Silver Eagle
Johnson is a liberal who only hates muslims because muslims arent particularly liberal on social issues.
His hatred of religion, in all its varied manifestations, is what has driven him off the tracks.
Sad, really, but not worth dwelling on.
To: pmedia
To: pmedia
LGF has jumped the shark. I’ve deleted my bookmark for it.
26
posted on
08/08/2009 10:23:27 AM PDT
by
Godzilla
(TEA - Taxed Enough Already)
To: Rocko
27
posted on
08/08/2009 10:23:36 AM PDT
by
pmedia
To: pmedia
Violence is wrong! Every war, football game and half of all marriages are solved by violence.
28
posted on
08/08/2009 10:23:54 AM PDT
by
Richard Kimball
(We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
To: pmedia
Violence is wrong!*******************
Not necessarily.
29
posted on
08/08/2009 10:24:16 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: pmedia
To: browardchad
True. CJ hates all religions. He hates Islam the most because they are typically the most devout.
To: Admin Moderator
32
posted on
08/08/2009 10:25:00 AM PDT
by
pmedia
To: American Silver Eagle
You are right . Johnson and his website have shifted way way left. He supports the Dem party and the radical take over the health care sector !
33
posted on
08/08/2009 10:25:32 AM PDT
by
ncalburt
(Read all about)
To: pmedia
Yeah, he assumes we want to “debate” the government takeover of healthcare. The Libs want to debate it... we want to destroy it. Now, if they want to debate how to improve it in the private sector then we’re good.
But we refuse to “debate” the topic as long as the terms of the “debate” are set by socialist pigs in the realm of a government takeover. It’s that simple Johnson.
34
posted on
08/08/2009 10:26:21 AM PDT
by
NotSoModerate
(Report dissenters to snitch@whitehouse.gov for a $4,500 tax credit)
To: pmedia
Hello, troll. Do you like kittens? Because kittens like you...for a mid-afternoon snack.
To: pmedia
“Page Not Found.” Perhaps pulled by their moderators.
36
posted on
08/08/2009 10:28:31 AM PDT
by
Rocko
(Mymindisaragingtorrent,floodedwithrivuletsofthoughtcascadingintoawaterfallofcreativealternatives.)
To: wardaddy
True enough. I just thought, even the day I signed up, that if someone wanted to know a little about me, that they could look it up and ask questions if they like. Just as a courtesy, you know?
To: darkwing104; Old Sarge; 50mm
We have a live one, per AM at 16 and 19.
To: NotSoModerate
Yeah, he assumes we want to debate the government takeover of healthcare. The Libs want to debate it... we want to destroy it. They want to debate health care like they want a dialog about race. They want us to sit down and shut up and smile while they scream at us.
39
posted on
08/08/2009 10:29:45 AM PDT
by
Richard Kimball
(We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
To: rabscuttle385
Is that a picture of Albuquerque, NM?
40
posted on
08/08/2009 10:29:58 AM PDT
by
federal
To: federal
To: Admin Moderator
The problem that I have with the comment was, "
If the talking point is going to be that the demonstrators were just exercising their right to free speech and they were unjustly attacked by union thugs, I'm sorry, but I'm not gonna jump on that train.
Yelling and shouting (aka protesting, demonstrating) is no justification for ANY attack.
The comment sounds like he's saying the attacks weren't unjustified. I would like to ask, "Since when is being yelled at justification to physically assault someone?"
If you need a link, I'll be happy to provide it privately.
42
posted on
08/08/2009 10:32:16 AM PDT
by
TNdandelion
(This should be fun.)
To: pmedia
Never go to LGF anymore. But it’s his blog and he can do with it whatever he wants. Same with Jim Thompson.
43
posted on
08/08/2009 10:32:23 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
(Hows My Posting? Please Contact flag@whitehouse.gov)
To: pmedia
You're making the claim, find the comments in question and paste them here with a link. Oh, and if the comments are from other posters, that does not mean it is CJ's opinion, just as your comment does not mean it's Jim Robinson's opinion.
And FWIW, I think CJ is a spineless weasel. But that does not mean claims about his blog don't have to be substantiated.
To: SW6906
nope I don’t think bullying old people is funny. I don’t think calling them a “mob” or calling for union thugs to beat them up is civilized. If that makes me a troll I guess I am. Just read the comments of LGF.
45
posted on
08/08/2009 10:34:59 AM PDT
by
pmedia
To: Rocko
Johnson has deleted several of his and other commenters posts. Including the one where he justified violence against “the mob.”
46
posted on
08/08/2009 10:34:59 AM PDT
by
pmedia
To: pmedia; Admin Moderator
You got smacked on your first post, what do you do for an encore?
47
posted on
08/08/2009 10:36:14 AM PDT
by
txroadkill
(God bless those who seek freedom in Iran-Let Freedom Ring!)
To: FreeSouthernAmerican
hell yes...I believe in the homepage
48
posted on
08/08/2009 10:36:16 AM PDT
by
wardaddy
(ASAP, as southern as possible.......Sarah Palin, i love you)
To: pmedia; TNdandelion
I think the poster in 42 provided the comment - was that the one written by CJ?
To: Admin Moderator
Here’s what Charles said about the protestors that were attacked:
74 Charles
8/07/09 10:57:11 am
9
down
up
report
If the talking point is going to be that the demonstrators were just exercising their right to free speech and they were unjustly attacked by union thugs, I’m sorry, but I’m not gonna jump on that train.
There may have been union thugs there, but what I see in these videos of the event is a whole lot of people acting like idiots, shouting down speakers, ranting like loons, and behaving a lot like ... yes, a mob. A lot of those people clearly went there with the intention of disrupting the event.
50
posted on
08/08/2009 10:37:52 AM PDT
by
NotSoModerate
(Report dissenters to snitch@whitehouse.gov for a $4,500 tax credit)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200, 201-218 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson