Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leaked Conversation Suggests EEStor's Battery-Killing Ultracapacitor Is Nearly Complete
Popular Science ^ | 7/30/2009 | Adrian Covert

Posted on 07/31/2009 5:47:32 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT

We've been closely following EEStor's potentially game-changing ultracapacitor--a technology that could allow for electric cars that charge almost instantaneously and drive hundreds of miles on a single charge.

And if a purportedly "leaked" phone conversation from EEStor CEO Richard Weir currently making the rounds is legit, the long-in-development ultracapacitor has hit a breakthrough, and could be unveiled within months.

...

EEStor's ultracapacitor works more or less exactly like the capacitors found in electronics today, briefly holding and releasing small charges, only on a much larger scale; it would be able rapidly take on enough juice to power a car for 250-300 miles within a matter of minutes, EEStor claims. It could also be used to store renewable energy generated by solar and wind plants more efficiently.

...

Though the source of the leak is unconfirmed, rumors are swirling that EEStor is working with the likes of Lockheed Martin, making the project seemingly more legit. But considering the company's secretive nature and unspectacular previous public tests, this "leak" could be nothing more than an ingenious marketing stunt.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: battery; renewableenergy; tech; ultracapacitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last
The "leaked" interview was posted here at FR last week, this article only adds a little backstory, and another hint at legitimacy.

The previous article is at:

Interview with Dick Weir, EESTor, inventor of the EESU

1 posted on 07/31/2009 5:47:33 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Forgot to check that this is an excerpt. Sorry.


2 posted on 07/31/2009 5:48:01 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Ping to a follow-up to the article you posted about EESTOR


3 posted on 07/31/2009 5:49:32 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Hmmm...Leaked, huh? Sounds a little fishy to me.


4 posted on 07/31/2009 5:51:45 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

If true. I want 5 of ‘em! I have a house I wanna power up!


5 posted on 07/31/2009 5:52:44 AM PDT by PureSolace (Trust in God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I can use one to power my Flying Car, which PM said I would have ten years ago... and twenty years ago... and thirty years ago...


6 posted on 07/31/2009 5:53:42 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (Don't blame me... I voted for PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Leaked huh? WOW, sounds great, where do I invest all my millions in this company?
7 posted on 07/31/2009 5:55:46 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond
She's real fine,
my EEstor...
8 posted on 07/31/2009 5:56:03 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

I do not like leaky capacitors.


9 posted on 07/31/2009 5:56:50 AM PDT by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Publicity stunt. That’s all these types of companies are good at doing.


10 posted on 07/31/2009 5:57:19 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Well, we will see when the rubber hits the road. Batteries in electric cars have consistently produced underwhelming results. The battery pack is designed for 300 miles, so they say, and then most of the reviews have the car actually going 100 miles or less. If the capacitors are equally elusive in yielding their best in the real world, we have progressed no further. I would also be concerned about the safety of these beasts — what happens if one decides to short itself out? Do we get a big explosion as it and all the rest dump their energy into the fault?


11 posted on 07/31/2009 5:57:55 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

You know what’s really sad => 50 years ago, we dreamed of advancing life through technology. Today, all we hear is gloom and doom. If these clowns win the day, we’ll all be moving back into caves in 10 years, that is only the lucky few who are allowed to live!!

I voted for Palin, too ; - )


12 posted on 07/31/2009 5:59:30 AM PDT by NCCarrs (http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/30/quake.usa.editorial.reut/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

This is going to make regenerative braking systems into a whole new breed of cat. With an electrical boost motor all your braking power is collected and when you accelerate you get an electrical boost thus saving fuel, a concept thats been tried hydraulically and in some electric cars but the battery bank weight overcomes any real advantage.


13 posted on 07/31/2009 6:00:09 AM PDT by Eye of Unk ("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

maybe i can add this to my list of truly amazing inventions and cures that will be here in just “five years”


14 posted on 07/31/2009 6:03:18 AM PDT by jjw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

why not just do as Tesla suggested ...send the power through the air and put a receiver in each car ...kinda like a radio


15 posted on 07/31/2009 6:03:19 AM PDT by jrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

You probably COULD have a flying car today. I don’t think the idea took off too well (pardon the pun) because of the dangers posed by filling the skies with a city’s worth of car-weight aircraft steered by average drivers. Nobody on the Jetsons ever had a car crash or stall in the sky and fall into somebody’s house.


16 posted on 07/31/2009 6:03:56 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
it would be able rapidly take on enough juice to power a car for 250-300 miles within a matter of minutes,

To accomplish that, you would need a power cord able to carry a megawatt of power.

For example, the Honda EV+'s battery holds 26.2 kwh. To charge that in 10 minutes, you need a 262 KW power source. That's over 500 amps at 500 volts.

17 posted on 07/31/2009 6:04:06 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I’m calling BS on the “almost instantaneously” part. Capacitors may allow for much higher charge rates, but for most uses, where are you going to get this extremely high voltage and current source to stuff however many Joules of energy into the capacitor in that short of a time? We’re talking some seriously big conductors and/or seriously high voltages. And probably a bank of (even higher voltage)ultracapacitors in the charging station to build up the juice ready to transfer it to the vehicle. OK, not to say it’s completely unfeasible technically, but it’s certainly another challenge.


18 posted on 07/31/2009 6:04:46 AM PDT by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like ox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Where’s the “Not this shit again.” poster?


19 posted on 07/31/2009 6:07:11 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

Clarify on why regenerative braking would need a heavier battery bank than the car already needs to just run on a charge?


20 posted on 07/31/2009 6:08:41 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I have a copy of that interview on MP3, it sounds very legitimate.

I also have an MP3 of a speech given by the CEO of Zenn motors proudly proclaiming that they would have the eestor pack in their cars at the end of the year, unfortunately, that year was 2007.

I remain hopeful but not optimistic.

21 posted on 07/31/2009 6:09:23 AM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT; rbg81; PureSolace; bondjamesbond; BallyBill; Eric in the Ozarks; battlecry; ...
There's no magic...an ultra-capacitor is just a capacitor with an improved dielectric material. Increase the plate area, decrease the distance between plates, get more capacity.

Thinner dielectric=higher capacitance, but also higher leakage (runs down faster), lower voltage allowed before breakdown.

These guys may have found a good new compromise material for the dielectric, and have some unique plate fabrication tech...but it's just the same old physics.

22 posted on 07/31/2009 6:10:16 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
On a smaller scale, 5.11 tactical products has a new flashlight that charges in 90 seconds, and runs for 120 minutes.

Info here!

23 posted on 07/31/2009 6:11:23 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution - 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

That might be possible at specialty charging stations. At home, no way. You’d kill the lights in the whole neighborhood.


24 posted on 07/31/2009 6:12:04 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jrd
why not just do as Tesla suggested ...send the power through the air and put a receiver in each car ...kinda like a radio

Physics.
25 posted on 07/31/2009 6:12:27 AM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I would also be concerned about the safety of these beasts — what happens if one decides to short itself out? Do we get a big explosion as it and all the rest dump their energy into the fault?

If the ultracap was damaged in a collision, and the energy release explosively, it would be the equivalent of 860 grams of TNT per kwh of capacity. For a 26kwh battery, that would be about 50 lbs of TNT.

That would definitely wake the neighborhood!

26 posted on 07/31/2009 6:13:16 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Anyone with a basic understanding of electronics, batteries and capacitors would know that charging a capacitor takes a mere fraction of the time that it does a battery.

At question is getting the capacitor to STORE the energy, then provide a controlled release of electricity to convert it to actual physical work.

This is what capacitors were in fact designed to do, however the SCALE that's being proposed in this case is something that hasn't been accomplished (at least to my knowledge) yet. I'm not going to poo-poo the company yet, but I'll watch with interest to see if in fact they've done what they claim. If they have, we're witnessing the beginning of the end of a big portion of our dependence on foreign oil, and IMO that'd be a good thing.

Personally I'm tired of spending my hard earned cash and giving it to people who'd kill us if they could.

27 posted on 07/31/2009 6:13:28 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCCarrs

You do not understand what the technology promises.

Our current state of technology is transient. A petro economy is not the penicle of human achievement. This type of technology could move use to an entirely nuclear powered economy. Or what ever is the most secure and economic power source.

If they can make it, it opens up a whole new world of posibilities. This is a good thing if true.


28 posted on 07/31/2009 6:14:22 AM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Basically a glorified electrolytic capacitor, with spongy stuff rather than flat plates.


29 posted on 07/31/2009 6:15:17 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“That might be possible at specialty charging stations. At home, no way. You’d kill the lights in the whole neighborhood.”

Unless you have a larger power storage unit in the garage. It would continually recharge at a lower current draw. As a benefit, it would also power the house for a few days if the power was out.


30 posted on 07/31/2009 6:16:29 AM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bondjamesbond

Where are those flying cars? I remember seeing them in Sci-fi all the time back in the forties and fifties. They were supposed to have arrived several years ago as I recall.


31 posted on 07/31/2009 6:17:48 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Clarify on why regenerative braking would need a heavier battery bank than the car already needs to just run on a charge?

Regenerative braking is limited by how fast a battery can take a charge. Most hybrids can only regenerative brake at a modest deceleration. If the driver calls for more brakes, the excess energy is scrubbed off as heat in the disc rotors and pads.

In theory, a capacitor can charge (and discharge) orders of magnatude faster than a battery, so that more dynamic regenerative braking can be used.

32 posted on 07/31/2009 6:18:22 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
True, anyone who's accitentally overcharged and blown up a 5 microfarad capacitor knows it sounds like a gunshot going off, and there's a fair amount of energy in there.
33 posted on 07/31/2009 6:18:52 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

These guys sound like the brothers of that obnoxious Tesla press-release manufacturing company.


34 posted on 07/31/2009 6:19:27 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-

Exactly. It’s simple math to compute an amperage rate from the drive distances and charge times they quote. Which will lead you to power cables as thick as your wrist, or such.


35 posted on 07/31/2009 6:19:44 AM PDT by Beelzebubba (Typical "Rightwing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc; NCCarrs

36 posted on 07/31/2009 6:20:31 AM PDT by WVKayaker (God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.-D.Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Chemical energy of a fuel is not a bad way to move automobiles. Being able to convert grid power into chemical fuel energy at a reasonable efficiency would be the death of a “petro economy” just as much as an ideal battery or capacitor, and probably an easier goal. Oil won’t go away in any case; we need it for chemicals and plastics.


37 posted on 07/31/2009 6:21:30 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

This is exciting news, if real...but read the posts on this blog...sounds like a different story maybe.

http://bariumtitanate.blogspot.com/2002/07/if-fascination-of-eestors.html


38 posted on 07/31/2009 6:22:21 AM PDT by Wpin (I do not regret my admiration for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Why not use capacitors as buffers? They can release their energy back into acceleration without having to supply cruising power.


39 posted on 07/31/2009 6:23:11 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Current ultracapicators (so to speak) store about 15 W-hr energy per Kg of mass. Recent breakthroughs indicate 45 W-hr/Kg is possible. EEStore is claiming 400 W-hr/Kg. Gasoline, for comparison is 15,000 W-he/Kg. Even when you consider that IC engines waste 2/3 of the energy in gasoline, the EEStore ultracapicators will weigh ten times the weight of gasoline for an equivalent vehicle range. If you consider they are not really ten times as efficient as currently feasible ultracapicators, they will weigh 100 times the weight of equivalent gasoline. This analysis doesn't even consider the energy, and power required to charge them. Don't hold your breath waiting for them for your car.
40 posted on 07/31/2009 6:24:03 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Anyone with a basic understanding of electronics, batteries and capacitors would know that charging a capacitor takes a mere fraction of the time that it does a battery.

And the current it takes to charge a capacitor big enough to run a car "almost instantaneously" will melt your wires. In a practical sense, the rate of charge will have to be throttled to a more reasonable level.

As always, the underlying problems remain-where is the electricity going to come from in a country in which the environmental Nazis won't allow nuke plant contstruction, and how much is it going to cost to upgrade the power grid to handle millions and millions of capacitors being charged?

41 posted on 07/31/2009 6:25:19 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (When the going gets tough, the tough go out for ice cream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

42 posted on 07/31/2009 6:31:03 AM PDT by EricT. ("Mankind, when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government." -George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
As always, the underlying problems remain-where is the electricity going to come from in a country in which the environmental Nazis won't allow nuke plant contstruction, and how much is it going to cost to upgrade the power grid to handle millions and millions of capacitors being charged?

I think that's the bigger problem vs. the size of the cable required to charge the vehicle. I don't think I can publish my solution to that problem on this forum however.

As for the first part of your statement, I have ham radio equipment that pulls 220v and an excess of 75 amps to key and run (think large amplifiers here..) so visualizing the cable required to charge a vehicle for me isn't that big of a deal. However, the thought of an average, every day consumer making that connection at a charging station DOES scare the hell out of me. One bad connection, one spark and the whole thing may just go up ....

43 posted on 07/31/2009 6:32:42 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
but the battery bank weight overcomes any real advantage.

Yep. They've been trying the Kinetic Energy Release System (KERS) in Formula One racing this year. They are already deciding to scrap it next year because it has been underwhelming. It produces interesting effects at the start and on long straights where the driver can engage it to bring a little more horsepower, but this is balanced out by the extra weight from the battery the car has to carry around the rest of the track.

44 posted on 07/31/2009 6:34:06 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EricT.

Sorry, but it is spelled Gigawatts, no J.


45 posted on 07/31/2009 6:37:48 AM PDT by calex59 (I, me, myself, am actually Jim Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: calex59

It’s just a funny image from the internet. I think it is spelled ‘jigawatts’ on purpose. It’s that whole satire/humour/poetic license thing. I know, I know. I have a hard time with those things as well. Breathe in. Breathe out.


46 posted on 07/31/2009 6:48:54 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: EricT.
Technology can be dangerous...


47 posted on 07/31/2009 6:56:33 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (Don't blame me... I voted for PALIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
However, the thought of an average, every day consumer making that connection at a charging station DOES scare the hell out of me.

I don't think it would be hard to design a safe plug system. You could even automate it so all terminals are safely covered until the device is inserted into the charger. The charger unlocks it and plugs it in inside the charger. When ready, the charger locks it back up and ejects it.

48 posted on 07/31/2009 7:03:13 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ( Obama, you're off the island!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Here’s a more sceptical view of EESTOR. There are some serious safety issues with these things.

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/5557


49 posted on 07/31/2009 7:04:06 AM PDT by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

When comparing gas to electric, you need to include the comparative weights of the engines, because the power you care about is the power delivered to the wheels, not the power delivered to the motor.

An electric motor for a given horsepower will weigh significantly less than the gas engine and associated parts.

The odd thing about the capacitor number here is that lithium-ion batterys are already at 340 W-hr/Kg, and can theoretically get over 1700 W-hr/Kg


50 posted on 07/31/2009 7:08:02 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson