Posted on 07/29/2009 5:34:12 AM PDT by WhiteCastle
President Obamas top science adviser said in a book he co-authored in 1973 that a newborn child will ultimately develop into a human being if he or she is properly fed and socialized.
The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being, John P. Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, wrote in Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions.
Holdren co-authored the book with Stanford professors Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich. The book was published by W.H. Freeman and Company.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
I can think of one obvious counter example.
Whoo-boy! You gotta get up pretty early in the morning to put anything past the Obama Admin.
Glad he cleared that up. I had my doubts. (sarc)
What do the ones who are not “properly socialized” turn into?
You beat me to it.
The quantity and quality of intelligence that comes from this Administration is truly mind boggling - worse than I thought.
Folks, this guy is setting the foundation for legalized infanticide.
This is just plain creepy.
Democrats.
“What do the ones who are not properly socialized turn into?”
Libtards maybe?
Leftists see people as things. The man can look at a 6 month old and say it isn’t human. That’s simply deranged. The part about “and given the essential early socializing experiences “ is quite telling. If they are raised the way he thinks is right, they are humans. If he doesn’t like their mindset, they are not. What a twisted bastard.
I thought the same thing!
And if the baby ISNT properly fed or "socialized", it goes up to be something entirely different... 

Seriously, the left is looking for a reason, an excuse to do what they historically always do - exterminate their ideological opponents.
This is but another angle. If you don't have the leftist (ie, Satanic in origin, worldly) worldview, you're not even to be considered human and can be disposed of as convenient.
Me too! :)
What the effect of this is: The baby before it is born and some time after is not human. It apparently takes some time before the "thing" develops into one.
Don't allow this type of foolish talk. It opens the door to legitimize abortion and presumably infanticide. Just sick.
I’m told my grandfather, upon seeing me as a newborn remarked: “My God, that kid looks almost human.”
A special zoo should collect and display the freaks from Barry’s administration.
Wow. The genius and intelligence the oozes forth from this administration to enlighten those of us that dwell amongst the “unwashed masses” is truly amazing. We should be thankful.....\s
I don’t suppose he details his definition of what constitutes “proper socialization”, hmm?
Wasn’t there a period of time, not so long ago, where skin color made some people less human than others? What is the difference between this and some arbitrary definition of “proper socialization” to determine one’s humanity?
Wow. Just, wow.
Democratic presidents' science advisers, based on available evidence.
Politicians and criminals, but I repeat myself.
Something 0bama wholeheartedly supports, based on his votes as an Illinois state senator.
It's too bad that Holdren started out as a human and turned into a monster.
If I’m not mistaken, he has advocated teh right to infanticide up to the age of two. I guess the post womb/delivery phase fetus has developed into a living being by their 11th trimester of liflike qualities.
Menegele.
What next, will Bambi appoint an ‘Adequate socialization Czar’?
Ok where is Captain Obvious? ..........how stupid.
Oops, ‘Mengele’
And where does this go? Conservatives are not human. Yes, that would be the “logical leap” these heirs of Lysenko would take.
Ehrlich, the most fatuously wrong scientist of all time? The man who predicted the world-wide famines that killed 90% of us in the 70's, but which so few of us can remember?
They've tried numerous angles to try to further this very theory.
They want us DEAD, folks. Make sure you understand that.
“What do the ones who are not properly socialized turn into?”
I’m guessing Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, and other undesirables.
Don't give us this mealy-mouthed Molochspeak.
Opens the door to EXTERMINATIONS
...and they make Nazi Germany seem almost compassionate.
Did this apply to his kids? Just wondering.
Well this guy still hasn’t
Liberals
There fixed it. I can't believe they used the word "Solutions" in the title.
MrB. You, sir, get it, as in understand liberalism.
I would add, enslaved or dead.
One or the other or both but NOT free AND alive.
There is nothing that makes a leftist more infuriated than someone living outside of their control.
Just as a parallel, let’s look at the options that Islam offers the world:
1) Be one of us
2) Be our slave
3) Die
Familiar?
Hmmmm, I’m still waiting for the safer bullets that was suggested years ago by another Dem wonder.
Liberals.
Obamas Science Czar Said a Born Baby Will Ultimately Develop Into a Human Being
So, this reasoning will allow Obama and his minions to continue to murder newborns if theyre accidentally born during a botched abortion. Good thinking . . . Can you imagine: Will Ultimately Develop Into a Human Being!
Then what the hell is it before this so-called development? What are we . . . Nazis?

Combine with Obama’s freakish Euthanistic Ezekiel Emanuel, and you have an administration with truly frightening “values.”
A: RWEs*
*For those with short memories, "right wing extremists"
Michael Crichton wrote about this same idea in his novel “A Case of Need” (under the pseudonym Jeffrey Hudson) back in the late 60’s. At that time, it was known as the “DNA Template Theory.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.