Posted on 07/26/2009 7:20:56 PM PDT by kellynla
Editors Note: In December ‘08 a retired CIA officer commissioned an investigator to look into the Barack Obama birth certificate and eligibility issue. On July 21, 2009 westernjournalism.com obtained a copy of the investigator’s report. Here is an unedited version of the report.
The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii
I think that I now understand the legal background to the question of where Obama was born.
Let’s begin with the statement that Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the Director of the Hawaii Department of Health released on October 31, 2008. The television and print media used this statement as a reason to prevent and treat with contempt any investigation into whether Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii. But the language of the statement was so carefully hedged and guarded that it should have had the opposite effect.
“There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law (Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record. Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
It is understandable that after such an apparently definitive statement most news outlets, whether conservative or liberal, would accept this as sufficient grounds to relegate the controversy to the status of a fringe phenomenon. Unless they happened to take the trouble to look into the “state policies and procedures” as laid down by the relevant statutes. If they had done so, they would have seen that Dr. Fukino’s press release was carefully hedged and “lawyered” and practically worthless. But the media in general should not be faulted. The statement seems to roll out with such bureaucratic certainty and final authority. I believed it to be significant until a Honolulu attorney mailed me the relevant statutes. I was so surprised that I laughed out loud.
wow
Lt. Quarles Harris’s co-conspirator worked at the US State Dept. Harris was murdered. Fast forward: The credit card scam may be a ruse (in why he was killed.) One could conclude that Obama’s breached passport records were likely CAUTERIZED of any and all incriminating evidence, that proved conclusively that he is ineligible to hold the highest office in the land.
The credit card scam may be the cover (deflection of motive.) Harris may be a dupe on the order of Lee Harvey Oswald (as hypothesized by conspiracists.) Note: I take no position on such conspiracy in this post. One could make the leap that Harris was a small time fry caught up in something way over his head.
John O Brennan (25 years in the CIA) is the owner of the company that was contracted out to do work for the State Dept., with specificity to passports. An employee of his assisted in the breach of passport records. Brennan is an assistant, or was an assistant to Obama. Harris worked with somebody on the inside. Did Harris know too much and therefore had to be taken out? Lots of coincidences that make you go hmmm.
Here’s a link to the EO. It doesn’t directly reference -11nobama’s BC or college records. It’s kinda legalese. Hard to understand.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13489
That’s a great article.
Isn’t the first rule of whistle-blowing: make lots of copies and have MULTIPLE “in the event of my death...” instructions?
FYI: here’s Brennan’s company name: The Analysis Corp.
Search- Lt. Quarles Harris, John O. Brennan, and The Analysis Corp. for further enlightenment.
I’m just getting up to speed myself. Very intriguing, and very disturbing. There’s a whiff of something very foul in the air about it all.
I’d like to know more details about the murder of Harris. Was it a ‘professional’ hit? No trace of any clues? Shell casings policed up or captured as they were ejected? Something on that order...
ping
Lieutenant was his NAME, not any rank.
BTY, it appears that there is no federal statute as to what the states must use to declare a person “born within their state.” Thus, this issue is probably legally residing within the state law.
Therefore, the @#$%ed up laws of 1961 Hawaii trump Federal law, and Zer0 could claim to be a citizen.
Has anyone even followed up on the angle that if Stanley Ann Dunham was just 17 when Obama was born, then his dad was a statutory rapist?
I cannot believe that the State of Hawaii would destroy paper records without first committing them to digital media of some sort; images on disc, at least. In fact, if the records were destroyed in 2001, how did State officials examine the BC in 2008?
Sorry, not buyin’ this bill of goods...
He ineligible to hold the office (and the prior one, most likely), and is perpetrating a fraud of the highest order on the American people.
Don’t know what the laws in HI were,
so it’s possible .. and also a bigamist,
but then no marriage license for the
Obamas has been found to my knowledge.
~~PING!
The Annenberg project known as FactCheck.org came from funds donated to a Pennsylvania University (education), which was donated by The Annenberg Foundation. It also credits Annennberg on the website under title:
http://www.factcheck.org/
I had read that info a year ago, but it took awhile to remember it. It was a blip of almost no size on Fox, and at time I checked it out....if we don’t document things now they will disappear. I’ll try to find where I read that info about the donations.
One would have to go to the capital of Hawaii, and view vital records films (and no doubt they are sealed for that year) to find it...if it exists. Some states do not allow anyone to view digital media on vital statistics. Certified copies are supplied only to person or family members.
“anyone even followed up on the angle that if Stanley Ann Dunham was just 17 when Obama was born”
I “thought” she was born 11/29/1942?
Absolutely .. factcheck.org is under the umbrella of the
Annenberg Foundation.
I always thought his last visit to his ailing grandmother was to silence her before she got conscience at the end and said something damaging about him to someone. I know it sounds silly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.