Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military smoking ban puts troops in danger
Washington Times ^ | Thursday, July 16, 2009 | Editorial

Posted on 07/15/2009 9:44:58 PM PDT by JohnRLott

Combat troops put their lives on the line every day, but there is one risk the government considers too dangerous for them -- smoking.

"Combating Tobacco Use in Military and Veteran Populations," a new report by the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine, advocates restricting smoking in the military and limiting recruitment of those who smoke. As with so many government regulations, this proposed ban may actually do the opposite of what is hoped and put soldiers' lives in danger.

Troops returning from deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan "may be" 50 percent more likely to use tobacco than military personnel who have not been deployed, according to the report. We wouldn't be surprised if troops in the field had even higher rates of tobacco use -- but for legitimate reasons.

Cigarettes, and tobacco in general, can relieve stress. They make people more alert and calm at the same time, which are two dispositions soldiers in dangerous areas need. There is a lot of tension on duty when lives are on the line; it can be hard to keep attention focused, especially when troops haven't slept in days. Just letting one's mind wander for a second could mean lost lives. . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: bhodod; cigarettes; nannystate; obama; pufflist; smoking; soldiers; washingtontimes

1 posted on 07/15/2009 9:44:59 PM PDT by JohnRLott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

I read that the Pentagon already rejected the idea.


2 posted on 07/15/2009 9:50:44 PM PDT by Rodebrecht (What are you and who do you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

The insane are in charge of the asylum: they want to ban cigarette smoking in war zones, and legalize pot in California. Hey, wait, I have an idea. . . .


3 posted on 07/15/2009 9:52:40 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

Pass the Marlboro and pass the the ammo.

4 posted on 07/15/2009 10:02:05 PM PDT by dancusa (The word "racist" is a magic shield word that's supposed to stop any dissent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dancusa

What a great Picture of the war.


5 posted on 07/15/2009 10:16:11 PM PDT by imahawk (I am Jim Thompson,Life is tough.It's even tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: imahawk

That’s a
Pulitzer picture.


6 posted on 07/15/2009 10:17:28 PM PDT by dancusa (The word "racist" is a magic shield word that's supposed to stop any dissent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott
I'm a non-smoker, but it's time for some push back on this smoking ban.  This is just plain nuts.

The Freepathon is still going strong.  Let's put an end to it.


                          The following is directed to Freepers who haven't donated or signed up for monthlies yet...



26% is good.  100% is better.  You know you're going to do it.  Pull the trigger!  You don't have to pay it all now.  $5 now, $25 next week, $10 later... keep the ball rolling.

Monthly donorship is a good way for us to avoid having to do the Freepathons.  Besides, it's a great way to pony up in style.
If you're on the verge of becoming a monthly donor or you think you would like to up your monthly donation a bit, has Jim got a deal for you. 
Check this out.  There's an added incentive for a limited time only.  (Always wanted to type that...)


Thanks to Freepers who have been frequenting the Freepathon thread to ham it up with folks over there.  It helps to raise the visibility of the Freepathon.

Jump into the Monthly Donorship special thread too.

The Spirit Of Allegiance says, "For those about to donate, I salute you!"  So do I.


7 posted on 07/15/2009 10:46:09 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (_Resident of the United States and Kenya's favorite son, Baraaaack Hussein Obamaaaa...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

Soldiers would just start drinking instead of smoking. Very very bad idea. But we now have sheltered overgrown children in charge of our society. God help us.


8 posted on 07/15/2009 11:18:46 PM PDT by Clock King (There's no way to fix D.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dancusa

The Battle of Fallujah.


9 posted on 07/16/2009 12:39:34 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott
See if I understand this correctly.

It is OK for the CIC (Obama) to smoke, but the troops under his command cannot.

Ya, that seems like a well thought out plan to keep the troops happy.

I detest libs.

10 posted on 07/16/2009 5:10:10 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 (You can never have too much cowbell !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodebrecht
I read that the Pentagon already rejected the idea.

They have. Gates said: "Smoke 'em if you got 'em."

11 posted on 07/16/2009 6:33:50 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Because with the screwing-over Obama’s already giving to the military, this might be the last straw that pushes troops over into mutiny.


12 posted on 07/16/2009 10:06:44 AM PDT by coydog (Proud to have slept through the Obama coronation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott; P-Marlowe; Lancey Howard; bigheadfred; jude24

I remember being told that at night a lit cigarette can be seen 2 miles away and targeted. I’m sure it’s more since the advent of night vision and infra-red equipment.

Therefore, one can make a case for or against cigarettes depnding on how on is disposed.

That is not what threatens soldiers. What threatens soldiers is lack of financial and morale support from the civilian front. The imposition of rules that really are matters of personal choice threaten their morale and cause them to question the legitimacy of the civilian authority over them.

When of age, let them smoke or let them drink just the same as you would their same-aged civilian counterparts.

It is silly to treat as a child someone you’ve sent out to kill for you.


13 posted on 07/16/2009 11:53:01 AM PDT by xzins (Chaplain Says: Jesus befriends all who ask Him for help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRLott

This is a return to the Clinton era when the military was forced into dangerous, stupid social experiments.


14 posted on 07/16/2009 4:49:00 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins; RedRover; Girlene

This is a perfect idea for people put into situations where stress is THE WORD. Muddled and confusing ROE’s. Extended AND MULTIPLE tours of duty. A political agenda that tends to persecute AND prosecute. Hmmm...

“Soldier, why did you you shoot 138 civilians, 14 of your fellow troops and six small dogs?”

Hmmm...

I work in an industry where I have access to a multitude of sharp objects. When it is time to step outside for a smoke, IT IS TIME TO STEP OUTSIDE FOR A SMOKE! :-)


15 posted on 07/16/2009 6:15:34 PM PDT by bigheadfred (With a sharp object you can make a nice club in no time!!!! :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

....and six small dogs?

Oh, the humanity!


16 posted on 07/17/2009 5:47:20 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
HAHAHA! Brings out the Epicurean in ya...

"“Let no one be slow to seek wisdom when he is young nor weary in the search of it when he has grown old. For no age is too early or too late for the health of the soul. And to say that the season for studying philosophy has not yet come, or that it is past and gone, is like saying that the season for happiness is not yet or that it is now no more. Therefore, both old and young alike ought to seek wisdom, the former in order that, as age comes over him, he may be young in good things because of the grace of what has been, and the latter in order that, while he is young, he may at the same time be old, because he has no fear of the things which are to come. So we must exercise ourselves in the things which bring happiness, since, if that be present, we have everything, and, if that be absent, all our actions are directed towards attaining it.” —Epicurus

17 posted on 07/17/2009 1:58:40 PM PDT by bigheadfred (NEGROMANCER!!!! Run for your LIVES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson