Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter: DEMS TO GOP NOMINEE: WILL THE DEFENDANT PLEASE RISE? (New "hot one in the robe")
AnnCoulter.Com ^ | July 15, 2009 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 07/15/2009 3:02:28 PM PDT by Syncro

DEMS TO GOP NOMINEE: WILL THE DEFENDANT PLEASE RISE?
July 15, 2009
Every time a Democrat senator has talked during the Senate hearings on Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor this week, I felt lousy about my country. Not for the usual reasons when a Democrat talks, but because Democrats revel in telling us what a racist country this is.

Interestingly, the Democrats' examples of ethnic prejudice did not include Clarence Thomas, whose nomination hearings began with the Democrats saying, "You may now uncuff the defendant."

Their examples did not include Miguel Estrada, the brilliant Harvard-educated lawyer who was blocked from an appellate court judgeship by Senate Democrats expressly on the grounds that he is a Hispanic -- as stated in Democratic staff memos that became public.

No, they had to go back to Roger Taney -- confirmed in 1836 -- who was allegedly attacked for being a Catholic (and who authored the Dred Scott decision), and Louis Brandeis -- confirmed in 1916 -- allegedly a victim of anti-Semitism.

Indeed, Sen. Patrick Leahy lied about Estrada's nomination, blaming it on Republicans: "He was not given a hearing when the Republicans were in charge. He was given a hearing when the Democrats were in charge."

The Republicans were "in charge" for precisely 14 days between Estrada's nomination on May 9, 2001, and May 24, 2001, when Sen. Jim Jeffords switched parties, giving Democrats control of the Senate. The Democrats then refused to hold a hearing on Estrada's nomination for approximately 480 days, shortly before the 2002 election.

Even after Republicans won back a narrow majority in 2003, Estrada was blocked "by an extraordinary filibuster mounted by Senate Democrats" -- as The New York Times put it.

Memos from the Democratic staff of the Judiciary Committee were later unearthed, revealing that they considered Estrada "especially dangerous" -- as stated in a memo by a Sen. Dick Durbin staffer -- because "he is Latino and the White House seems to be grooming him for a Supreme Court appointment."

Sandy Berger wasn't available to steal back the memos, so Durbin ordered Capitol Police to seize the documents from Senate computer servers and lock them in a police vault.

Led by Sens. Leahy and Chuck Schumer, Democrats ferociously opposed Estrada, who would have been the first Hispanic to sit on the influential U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. They were so determined to keep him off the Supreme Court that Leahy and Schumer introduced legislation at one point to construct a fence around Estrada's house.

In frustration, Estrada finally withdrew his name on Sept. 5, 2003.

At the time, liberal historian David Garrow predicted that if the Democrats blocked Estrada, they would be "handing Bush a campaign issue to use in the Hispanic community."

Alas, today Democrats can't really place Estrada -- James Carville confuses him with that other Hispanic, Alberto Gonzales. On MSNBC they laugh about his obscurity, asking if he was the cop on "CHiPs." They also can't recall the name "Anita Hill." Nor can anyone remember African-American Janice Rogers Brown or what the Democrats did to her.

Read more at AnnCoulter.Com


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; anncoulte; bho44; coulter; judicialnominees
So when Republicans treat Sotomayor with respect and Sen. Lindsey Graham says his "hope" is that "if we ever get a conservative president and they nominate someone who has an equal passion on the other side, that we will not forget this moment," I think it's a lovely speech.

It might even persuade me if I were born yesterday.

Read the rest at AnnCoulter.Com
1 posted on 07/15/2009 3:02:30 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Syncro


2 posted on 07/15/2009 3:10:59 PM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
The Republicans always seem to vote en mass for activist leftist judges to show how non partisan they are, and the leftists pay them back with racist and porn references (Anita Hill v Clarance Thomas) and completely vilify and rake over the coals un mercifully any conservative constructivist constutionalist nominee put up by a Republican president.
3 posted on 07/15/2009 3:11:14 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Graham is a moron


4 posted on 07/15/2009 3:11:38 PM PDT by GeronL (UnitedCitizen.Blogspot.Com --------- United Citizens Nation! ------------- Join Today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
To the extent that the Sotomayor hearings have been less than civil, it is, again, liberals who have made it so, launching personal attacks against the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, Sen. Jeff Sessions, and even the fireman whose complaint started the Ricci case.

But it was a nice speech.

Is there no Republican Senator with b*lls other than Senator Sessions? Is there not one willing to stand up for The Constitution? It's only the greatest document defining man's rights and freedoms ever written.....

5 posted on 07/15/2009 3:18:43 PM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Ann Coulter makes abundantly clear just how WEAK the Republicans are - they are now the Party of Extinction, alas.


6 posted on 07/15/2009 3:46:54 PM PDT by 2harddrive (then)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

SHE, however, is still QUITE hot!


7 posted on 07/15/2009 3:47:42 PM PDT by 2harddrive (then)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ann Coulter; All
Here is the reason for the little blurb I added to the title:
But when the tables were turned and Bill Clinton nominated left-wing extremist/ACLU lawyer Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Republicans lavished her with praise and voted overwhelmingly to confirm her, in a 96-to-3 vote. (Poor Ruth. If Sotomayor is confirmed, Ginsburg will no longer be known as "the hot one in the robe.")

8 posted on 07/15/2009 3:49:28 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
Ann Coulter makes abundantly clear just how WEAK the Republicans are - they are now the Party of Extinction, alas.

Yes she does.

And I was quite disappointed in Representative Mike Pence last nite on Fox News when he commented that the republicans have returned to their conservative base, or something close to that.

He made it appear that it's all fixed now. NOT!

Even Huckabee is dissing Palin now too.

9 posted on 07/15/2009 4:00:06 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
With what is happening to this country now, it looks it will be up to the people to invoke and enforce the constitution.

It's King George all over again.

There is a neat little clause in the Constitution that gives the citizens the right to change the government.

10 posted on 07/15/2009 4:03:06 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
How come nobody is bring up the point that if Sotomayor is confirmed that makes 6 Roman Catholics on the Supreme Court?

Hmmm Chuck Schumer??

11 posted on 07/15/2009 5:40:14 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Better to convert enemies to allies than to destroy them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Even more "curiouser and curiouser" is the fact that Sotomayor is declining to answer abortion questions.
12 posted on 07/15/2009 6:03:04 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Republicans lavished her ( Ginsburg ) with praise and voted overwhelmingly to confirm her, in a 96-to-3 vote.

Just in case there is ever a "Republican Hall of Fame":

Don Nickles (OK), Robert C. Smith (NH), and Jesse Helms (NC).

13 posted on 07/15/2009 7:52:14 PM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Memos from the Democratic staff ...considered Estrada "especially dangerous" -- as stated in a memo by a Sen. Dick Durbin staffer -- because "he is Latino and the White House seems to be grooming him for a Supreme Court appointment."

They weren't lying here. Then the dirty little lie the Dems have been telling about Republicans would have been revealed. Not that they couldn't have overcome it, like they frequently do with the media wing of their party.

14 posted on 07/16/2009 6:18:30 AM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson