Posted on 07/12/2009 12:28:52 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Professional politicians and political journalists don't waste energy on political corpses. They reserve their energy -- positive or negative -- for viable politicians.
Thus, an intriguing part of the Sarah Palin phenomenon is the intensity of response to her every word and move -- from both Republican Party and Democratic Party professionals and from the conventional media. The negative but sustained passion being expressed by the professional Washington political class against her tends to belie its almost unanimous assertion that she is washed up.
I happened to be on CNN on July 3 just as the story was breaking of Palin's resignation as governor of Alaska, and for the next hour, I was the only on-air guest -- Republican, Democrat, journalist, politician -- who was not overtly contemptuous and dismissive of Palin and her political future. On July 5, as a panelist on ABC's "This Week," I was similarly situated.
What is it about Palin that elicits such furious bipartisan Washington dismissiveness? After all, the polls show her to be tied with Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee for the very early lead in the 2012 Republican primary.
As an outspoken conservative with about an 80 percent favorable rating among Republicans and a high-40s-percentage favorable plurality among independents, objectively she should be seen as quite competitive nationally compared with other Republicans, particularly given that Republicans are generically weak and that she has been targeted so viciously by the media.(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...
Palin is the only true conservative who has any reasonable chance at becoming President any time soon. That fully and completely explains the reaction she elicits from anti-conservatives.
The chattering classes are spending a tremendous amount of energy arguing that she’s not worth the energy. . .
You can smell the fear.
Give em hell Sarah !
She’s the Dr. Pepper of American politics.
Your right! If she is so bad, so inept, so clueless why all the Page 1 press?
Maybe it is because she has the ability to connect with people. You know normal people like us. People who worry about where the country is going. People who want their children to inherent a country as good or better than that given them by their parents. People who live their lives using a moral compass such as the Ten Commandments and cannot understand why freaks and liars are celebrated on TV and in the MSM.
I hope she will build herself a big base in the lower 48, get some good men and women elected in 2010 and set the tone and conversation for 2012.
“Professional politicians and political journalists don’t waste energy on political corpses. They reserve their energy — positive or negative — for viable politicians. “
To make Tonys point look at Mark Sanford.It was a big story.But its already run its course.
But not like Sarahs.And the hysteria by the libs and RINO’s is incredible.They come up with all the chickenshit reasons to hate her as a smokescreen because there are a million reasons to like her.
Women wish they could be like her. And real men wish they could be with her.
Shes an outstanding role model for everyone.She needs to be more polished (prepared) as a politician.
I’d say Tony has put them all in the black.
( Note: a target metaphore, no racial inference
suggested. Author)
“Well, I’m not so sure that being an incumbent is an advantage if the world seems to be going to hell and government is seen to be at least part of the cause for that journey. And though many conventional politicians might be seen as quitters if they resigned their offices, I have a very strong hunch that Sarah Palin is constitutionally incapable of being seen as a quitter. Because she is not. She constantly is taking on the biggest challenge on her horizon.
Now, I am not endorsing her, predicting she will run, or predicting she is likely to win if she runs. Let’s wait a couple of years before getting to those questions. If President Obama is seen by the public to be a great success as president in 2012, he probably will be re-elected.
But if he is not seen as a great success, the public may be looking for a straight-talking candidate from the heartland who calls for and truly believes in limited government, maximum personal freedom and fiscal responsibility.
People may be listening for someone who knows how to talk to them rather than at them or down to them.
They also may respond favorably to a candidate who does not respond favorably to the Washington political class — nor it to her.”
At the stage we are in, someone who appears part of the problem ie;government is not the solution.
Go Sarah.
Fire in the belly?
You bet’ya.
There are really no more points for them to make. Wet ammo. Spent bullets. She is COMING. PERIOD!
All I can say is...
Go Sarah! :)
You’ve got my absentee vote!:)
What you said, LOL! But you’re absolutely right.
And I must say, sometimes I get tired of defending GWB (on the war on terrorists) and Sarah Palin (just because I like her and her faith and devotion to country and family) up here in the great white north.
However, I will continue to do so. ;)
All she needs is to talk to Maggie Thatcher and Nancy Reagan, and to go over Ron's old videotapes and chat with Michael Deaver a bit on how Reagan handled the press.
She'll be fine.
As for the media reaction, I remember vividly the column that Maureen Dowd wrote the day after Sarah's speech at the Republican National Convention. It reminded me of nothing so much as the climactic scene in Jurassic Park, when the raptor that is about to lunge at our heroes is suddenly snapped up by the returning Tyrannosaurus rex. Remember the reaction of the other raptor? It let out a scream of rage and fear, and just flew at the tyrannosaur's neck. That's what Mo Dowd did -- positively Mesozoic of her!
I love the smell of liberals sweating their guts out in the morning.
The RINOs and other worthless bastards had better step aside and allow Sarah and other Conservatives to rescue our Republic.
The RNC won't get any money from me if they block Sarah and other great folks like her.
The fear and superstition demonstrated by the press, pundits, and the paid thugs and character assassins remind me of the historical times that occurred before the civil war. People were so afraid of a general uprising by the slaves that they overreacted with murderous intent over and over again.
I would vote for Sarah Palin in a heartbeat.
Saving for later.....
The reaction to Palin’s announcement gives proof to the contention that there is some kind of virus inside The Beltway which infects the brains of those who live there for more than a few years.
Sarah Palin is light shedding on all (Dems, RINOs, etc.) who are lying to us for their own power, glory and money. Hopefully, that will be the light illuminating the truth thus enabling the rest of us to focus our energies in order to effect some serious changes in the ranks of our elected officials. I’m sadly of the opinion that it may be too late by 2012. We’ve got to clearly make the case and make those serious changes in 2010. Even if she runs for no office, her voice and her words will bring clarity if she is allowed to speak. The opposition’s defense, as usual, will be to “change the subject” from her message to her so-called behavior, which is the first tactic of all evil doers. “Obfuscation” will be their theme.
Ever since she appeared on the scene, I’ve been trying to get a grasp of Sarah’s thinking. I like what I have discerned. She has a solid view of reality and is comfortable with her place in it. She believes in God. She believes that God is personally involved in our lives and that He opens and closes doors.
I think that is where she gets her obvious courage, and that is what makes her smarter and stronger than the inwardly empty chatterers who assail her.
“To make Tonys point look at Mark Sanford.It was a big story.But its already run its course.”
Excellent point, same for Ensign (sp.). Both should gone from their posts - and the media would normally be driving them out. But the media could care less about Sanford, after all he’s the governor of a hick-state (in their opinion - but definitely not mine), and is truly washed up as a prez candidate...no need to denigrate him - bigger fish to fry. Ensign would normally be driven from office...but there’s a Republican Governor in Nevada, why waste their time.
Now Sarah is “washed up” according to them...but they still cannot leave her or her family alone. They know what I know...which is that Sarah could run as social conservative and NEVER have to say the word abortion, God, or anything else to PROVE that she’s a social conservative. She’s got that locked down already. So now she can reach out to the middle and bring them in...remind you of anyone? That is why they are SCARED TO DEATH of her.
As I posted on another thread about the hit piece Noonan has in the WSJ, quoting:
"What she is, is a seemingly very nice middle-class girl with ambition, appetite and no sense of personal limits." So said Noonan of Palin!
In making such a sweeping judgments of a woman who actually has done something, as opposed to just writing about things, makes their judgments simply irrelevant.
Noonan, in retrospect, like a chameleon, may have absorbed the glow of Reagan, heard his ideas which he so clearly expressed, and was able to put them to paper in such a manner that she accumulated an overblown resume--one which has followed her till today.
She has overstepped her own "personal limits" in her analysis of Palin, the millions of Americans who understand Palin well, and in where her small mind believes Palin will be in the future. By so doing, she has revealed things about herself which she may not have intended.
In Laura Ingraham's interview with Quinn on Oreilly this week, Quinn did the same thing. Her pettiness and irrational conclusions simply revealed her own bias.
bump
“... on July 3, fellow politically professional panelists were pointing out on-air how stupid Palin was to put forward her big story on a late Friday afternoon during a three-day holiday weekend. Everyone “knows” one buries a story that way.
“It became my grim duty to remind my fellow interlocutors — in case they had not noticed — that all the cable news shows were dropping their programming to switch to wall-to-wall coverage of the Palin announcement and that we were, at that moment, telling a national audience that the story we were talking about was being buried. The story persisted and expanded over that weekend, and my guess is that if any political topic came up at America’s millions of Fourth of July backyard barbecue parties, it was probably Sarah Palin. So, who’s the fool?”
-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—
Tony has everything in this article dead on. I know I discussed Sarah with people on July4 weekend...
The thing is, they’ve been so vicious to Sarah and her family that she is now fairly well insulated. What else can they say? It’s all old news now, including the fact that the media is willing to say or do anything to try to bring her down.
They did the same to President Reagan, and, it afforded HIM the same protection. “Teflon President” was originally a frustrated ridicule that they couldn’t make any of their inane antics stick.
Come campaign for me, SARAH! We love you in TEXAS! Besides, my mom made me promise that I’d introduce her to you, if I get the chance . . .
Excellent, Tony!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.