Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vengeance For Sarah: How It's Done
Eternity Road ^ | Sunday, July 05, 2009 | Francis W. Porretto

Posted on 07/06/2009 11:43:46 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla

I've received a lot of email...that suggests that the libertarian-conservative Right couldn't possibly do to the Left or the Republican Establishment what they've done to Sarah Palin. A few of my correspondents have suggested that it would be immoral, which indicates a lack of imagination. The majority have asked, in one way or another, "How?"

Here's how: a simple, easy-to-follow algorithm for making room for good people and the ideas of freedom in American politics once more:

  1. Pick a single target. It could be an elected or appointed official, or it could be some spokesvermin who merely flacks for anti-American ideas and policies. Just as long as it's someone you think should be hounded out of the public eye, if not the country. Buy a spiral-bound notebook and print XXX PROJECT, where XXX is your target's name, on the cover in large block letters.

  2. Subscribe to three newspapers or news feeds that cover your target's area of activity, <snip>....
  3. ... sift it for any patterns of activity he displayed, especially those involving sex, money, or real estate. ...

  4. ...and imagine the foulest plausible motives that could have given rise to those patterns.. ...

  5. Repeat the above procedure until your target is no longer worthy of anyone's attention.

<snip>

The key attributes of the above algorithm are:

<snip>

You might come up with something more elegant or efficient on your own, but what I've set down above, if faithfully prosecuted, is guaranteed to make the typical corrupt, arrogant bastard of a statist politician wish he'd never been born.

Let's get to work.

<snip>

(Excerpt) Read more at eternityroad.info ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dirtytricks; fighter; palin; palin2012; pds; realconservatives; sarah; sarahpalin; vengeance; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last
The whole of the plan isn't that long, but I snipped much of the detail so as to provide FReepers a good sense of the pleasing aroma of goose being cooked.

Definitely worth a look even if you think you lack the imagination or the drive or the persistence or the anger. Someone YOU KNOW will thank you for alerting them to this plan for activism.

1 posted on 07/06/2009 11:43:46 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: 4rcane

Any other target won’t do, as it has to make the Democrats/Media revolt in outrage, that anyone would dare target a politican’s family. Obama is the biggest target in which the media will circle the wagon for, no matter what. They want this administration to be successful and to tear him down with the same tactics the media use will be sweat justice


3 posted on 07/06/2009 11:49:46 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Heres one, anyone noticed that Michelle looks a bit fat around the belly recently? Speculation: Who’s the father?


4 posted on 07/06/2009 11:52:48 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
She had 500k in lawsuit debt.

So, anyone want to file lawsuits and have free lawyers to do your bidding like the unions and so forth, go for it.

5 posted on 07/06/2009 11:53:49 PM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
...what I've set down above, if faithfully prosecuted, is guaranteed to make the typical corrupt, arrogant bastard of a statist politician wish he'd never been born.

It will also make you just like them. If Sarah adopted this method, which, I doubt she would, I would walk away from her in a heartbeat.

6 posted on 07/06/2009 11:55:12 PM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Very few conservatives would be able to stomach seeing Obama’s kids being pulled into a battle they really did not ask for.

I think the shenanigans of the adults would more than suffice to shame the liberals. Produce two lists: the first one showing fallen Pubbies like Gov. Sanford, the second one ongoing scoundrel Rats such as Barney Frank, Ted Kennedy, Chris Dodd. The second list will of sheer necessity be far larger than the first.


7 posted on 07/06/2009 11:56:46 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Read Dr. Porretto’s full explanations, not just the skimpy portions I provided. He is giving you a plan to focus on any single target you want. Each FReeper takes a local council member of their choosing, or a state senator, or a congress critter. This is part of a plan to return to the “Progressives”, in spades, what they have been doing to our side for years. You want Obama, fine. That’s your choice; do it. But if we all concentrate only on Obama and force him to resign in disgrace, another statist will simply take his place.

This is a plan to take out statists and other miscreants one at a time.

Read Porretto’s entire article. It is not long and his arguments are plain and convincing.


8 posted on 07/06/2009 11:58:24 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus "CONSERVATIVE": a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

I don’t care the cause, KIDS are off limits. Adults, fine.


9 posted on 07/07/2009 12:02:24 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Damn. LOL!


10 posted on 07/07/2009 12:03:57 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

thats a problem on our side. We we wake up at dawn, line up neatly on the hill at the designated hour and start shooting at the enemy at the other end, sleep at night, and the enemy sneak in an slit everyone’s throat.

We lost, but we like to say, at least we have honor. We’re too set in old ways and dont have any imagination.


11 posted on 07/07/2009 12:04:34 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

Beats VooDoo dolls.


12 posted on 07/07/2009 12:04:57 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

The problem is that conservatives believe in telling whole truths, not half truths and innuendoes. If you are not on board with that, begone, we will not miss you.


13 posted on 07/07/2009 12:07:05 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut; American in Israel; Amerigomag; AnnaZ; Aquinasfan; BaBaStooey; Badray; BlackElk; ...

Ping.

This is a plan for wide spread counter attacking that can take out small corrupt players one at a time.

This really isn’t only for Sarah; It will return in spades against all corrupt pols what their henchmen have done to Sarah.

I recommend going to the original article to better understand the plain spoken thinking that allows this plan to work.

http://www.eternityroad.info/index.php/weblog/single/vengeance_for_sarah_how_its_done/


14 posted on 07/07/2009 12:08:19 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus "CONSERVATIVE": a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

... and now that we’ve lost the battle at the hill, the enemy moves to our homes and rape and pillage. But we like to say, at least we dont resort to their tactics

Like I said before, this is not a sport. This is war. People’s lives are at stake here. Policy decision effect millions of ppl because we lost at the hill


15 posted on 07/07/2009 12:09:22 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla; Travis McGee; hiredhand; appleseed

I will never attack or dicuss a targets children UNLESS they enter the political arena at age 18.

I will never lower myself hopefully to that level.

To do such IMO is lower than whaleshit in the trench.

Good how to thread thnx !!!


16 posted on 07/07/2009 12:16:32 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csense
"It will also make you just like them"

The Right doesn’t need to be just like them, the Right needs to be worse. It’s so repulsive to hear the ‘don’t sink to their level, BS.

You’d have us lining up in ranks and columns. Yours is the personal application of appeasement. You equate the evil hatred of righteousness with the righteous hatred of evil.


17 posted on 07/07/2009 12:18:42 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

The liberals’ own documented shameful record will suffice, if it is brought to light. There is no need to tell half truths and frame innuendos, as if the public could expect nothing better of us than of the Rats.


18 posted on 07/07/2009 12:19:29 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands
the Right needs to be worse

And the result of trying to outdo the liberals in ginning up half truths and innuendo is... well, I'll skip the political consequences (which may not be as rosy for the "right" as you'd think), but it also sells your soul to the Father of Lies.

19 posted on 07/07/2009 12:24:26 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
thats a problem on our side. We we wake up at dawn, line up neatly on the hill at the designated hour and start shooting at the enemy at the other end, sleep at night, and the enemy sneak in an slit everyone’s throat. We lost, but we like to say, at least we have honor. We’re too set in old ways and dont have any imagination.

And if the majority of the people in this country are the sneaky, throat slitting kind, then what's the point. If those are the people you're going to lead, then exactly what kind of leader are you, really.

I don't believe that this represents the majority of the American public, and this country is in dire need of a leader with honor and integrity, and don't fool yourself into believing that we need to adopt their ways in order to defeat them. All we need is someone to lift the veil, and those principles that made this country great, and what we conservatives especially hold dear, will kick in and do the rest, because if that is not true, then the country simply isn't worth leading.

20 posted on 07/07/2009 12:29:10 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

I think Obama and his scurvy crew will scupper themselves without the need for the Good Guys to compromise ourselves with dirty tricks.

In my view, time is all that is required. Time and patience.


21 posted on 07/07/2009 12:31:54 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
This really isn’t only for Sarah; It will return in spades against all corrupt pols what their henchmen have done to Sarah.

If you think this is about vengeance, then you haven't been paying attention to her words.

22 posted on 07/07/2009 12:33:48 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"well, I'll skip the political consequences (which may not be as rosy for the "right" as you'd think), but it also sells your soul to the Father of Lies"

Well, then let’s freaking kill ourselves. Too bad the enemy doesn't have people who think like you, but your words are music to their ears. Huddah to mine.


23 posted on 07/07/2009 12:40:56 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

If can’t win with the truth, there’s no point in winning.


24 posted on 07/07/2009 12:41:56 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
This is war.

And if you can't defeat them on principles and sound reasoning, then you have nothing, least of all any basis for calling yourself a conservative, not to mention the worthiness of leading such a people who do respond to such...

25 posted on 07/07/2009 12:42:10 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DB

No falsehood was implied as far I can tell. READ THE WHOLE THING. :)


26 posted on 07/07/2009 12:43:21 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus "CONSERVATIVE": a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands
The Right doesn’t need to be just like them, the Right needs to be worse. It’s so repulsive to hear the ‘don’t sink to their level, BS. You’d have us lining up in ranks and columns. Yours is the personal application of appeasement. You equate the evil hatred of righteousness with the righteous hatred of evil.

Oh please, grow up....

27 posted on 07/07/2009 12:45:26 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

It does make a difference whether one acknowledges that heaven and hell are real.


28 posted on 07/07/2009 12:48:27 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands
but your words are music to their ears...

No, they're not. That's why they want to destroy people like Sarah Palin.

You're not very politically savvy, are you....

29 posted on 07/07/2009 12:55:11 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: csense
In Dr. Porretto's words: You might come up with something more elegant or efficient on your own, but what I've set down above, if faithfully prosecuted, is guaranteed to make the typical corrupt, arrogant bastard of a statist politician wish he'd never been born.

I would add that you might come up with something more palatable to you.

Also, where you to warn others against unethical tactics, that is good too. But please don't under-appreciate the methodology presented. It presents a good way to keep track of rotten players and permits you to direct others make them pay for their excesses.

If I thought it required excesses of its own, I would not have posted it.

30 posted on 07/07/2009 12:57:11 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus "CONSERVATIVE": a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
But please don't under-appreciate the methodology presented.

I'm not sure how anyone can under appreciate a methodology that's been active for quite some time now. Get the hint?

31 posted on 07/07/2009 1:03:31 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

> The Right doesn’t need to be just like them, the Right needs to be worse.

Why? And what part of “that” is Conservative?

> It’s so repulsive to hear the ‘don’t sink to their level, BS.

Why? What is so repulsive about a principled approach to politics? Unprincipled politics is pretty darn repulsive — as we are seeing now, in the White House. Conservatives ought to be like that???

> You’d have us lining up in ranks and columns.

Anything would be better than the 2008 effort.

Conservatives couldn’t find and agree upon a single strong Conservative candidate to save their lives. Far from being in ranks and columns, Conservatives were a disorganized rabble, finding Sarah too late and EVEN THEN undermining her effectiveness.

Obama’s crew were lined up in ranks and columns, and they won decisively.

> Yours is the personal application of appeasement.

Who is being appeased, and how?

> You equate the evil hatred of righteousness with the righteous hatred of evil.

The Righteous love the sinner and hate the sin — just as God would have us do. Where do “dirty tricks” play a role in that?


32 posted on 07/07/2009 1:07:29 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: csense

That’s what I was thinking too. Why go to their level and waste brain power on worthless things that doesn’t benefit. We need ideas on how to right America again.

These worthless people will be hopefully only a footnote in time.


33 posted on 07/07/2009 1:19:58 AM PDT by Ruthless Princess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ruthless Princess
We need ideas on how to right America again.

Exactly. This is about country, and a great country at that. That's why the chattering classes don't understand what Sarah is doing, because they have no concept of country. At least that's one of the major reasons....

34 posted on 07/07/2009 1:25:31 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; fporretto

I cannot imagine Dr. Porretto disagreeing with your limits. He may find this thread tomorrow and answer more directly.


35 posted on 07/07/2009 1:37:00 AM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus "CONSERVATIVE": a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: dcwusmc

What “self righteous” “POS” is being referred to here?

It’s quite ironic that a blog called Eternity Road is advocating such chthonic philosophy. We who have believed on Christ (no matter what label is over our church’s door), as well as Jews who believe in God, should be united in perceiving that the devil tempts would-be fighters for righteousness to make themselves indistinguishable from their opponents.

We have no need or call to stoop to innuendoes and half truths. The bare truth is enough to shame liberals, if it is told with persistence.


37 posted on 07/07/2009 1:50:49 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: HiTech RedNeck
It’s quite ironic that a blog called Eternity Road is advocating such chthonic philosophy.

Not really. The road to hell is just as much a road to eternity as is the road to heaven.

39 posted on 07/07/2009 2:02:15 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

“Buy a sprial bound notebook and print XXXX PROJECT”...Who do we show this stuff to ? What do we do with this aquired information ? Form discussion groups ? All meet together in class and discuss it ?

Think any MSM outlet print or web/free tv news outlet will use it ?

While I agree with targeting particularly members and instruments of the media as well as Radical/ Socialist holdovers getting that information out to the public is the problem.

Lets take the MSM coverage of Obama background vs Palin’s as an example. In previous campaigns the presidential candidates background replete with family pixs of ma & pa and a happy childhood puff clips would be all over the place...Ever see a clip of Obama’s family ? Of him and his father ? Of Obama visiting his grandmother who raised him ? He didn’t even go to her funeral.

While MSM was busy resurecting and conjecturing bout the Palin’s and their problems now is the time to beseige MSM since its so interested in the Palin’s even six months after the election has been decided they never reviewed Obama’s family.background which is really lacking
http://www.theusmat.com/home.htm


40 posted on 07/07/2009 2:23:08 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (We don't need no stinkin video clips unrelated to the subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

Meanwhile, NYTimes house “conservative” David Brooks today accuses Gov. Palin of insufficient equipoise.


41 posted on 07/07/2009 2:30:05 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Meanwhile, NYTimes house “conservative” David Brooks today accuses Gov. Palin of insufficient equipoise.

Brooks ought to know. He's been riding a picket fence for years.

42 posted on 07/07/2009 2:34:08 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
Now that I've calmed down, I have a question for you. Just what exactly do you plan on doing. Attacking the White House? Deploying the military in the streets of America? If and when it ever warrants such things the situation in this country will be profoundly different, because right now, even with our political differences, you're going to have a hard time convincing our military to fire on their fellow citizens.

Are you going to literally start your own revolution? Who do you want us to kill first? Members of Congress? Judges? How about the Executive. Do you want to start from the top, with Obama? Or somewhere lower down the chain, and when you get to the Generals, let me know if their Service trumps their politics.

What kind of armed conflict do you envision needs to happen here, because if that is not your point, then what is your problem with sound, principled ideological reasoning, especially if you consider the majority of the American public to be principled and reasonable, albeit temporarily a little confused presently.

Do me the courtesy though of responding with a little civility. If you can't, then don't bother responding at all.

43 posted on 07/07/2009 2:53:02 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: csense

Well said.


44 posted on 07/07/2009 3:23:17 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla

I agree. Time for the gloves to come off. Target them all.

Meanwhile, we’ll see a procession of RINO surrender monkeys riding in on their poodles, crying that we shouldn’t insult the Marxists and fascists trying to destroy us, our families and the country. Ignore them. We also had whiners in our Revolutionary War who decried the tactic of patriot marksmen hiding behind trees and shooting at the pretty British all lined up in neat rows.

War is war. Do what has to be done to win.


45 posted on 07/07/2009 4:39:25 AM PDT by sergeantdave (obuma is the anti-Lincoln, trying to re-establish slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Well put.


46 posted on 07/07/2009 5:05:15 AM PDT by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: csense

>>...what I’ve set down above, if faithfully prosecuted, is guaranteed to make the typical corrupt, arrogant bastard of a statist politician wish he’d never been born.

It will also make you just like them. If Sarah adopted this method, which, I doubt she would, I would walk away from her in a heartbeat.<<

That is a 9/10 mentality. There are people who wish us great harm; but we are not going to recognize that? Look at what that got us! Only by taking the fight TO them, on our terms, can we defeat this enemy. Make no bones about it - LIBs are an enemy that must be destroyed(politically) or accept defeat and slavery.


47 posted on 07/07/2009 5:39:30 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Let me tell you something my friend. The only way to defeat or contain an ideology, is to expose it’s truths and principles, or the lack thereof, because only in the assumption that the general populace is reasonable, can you have a free society. The Founding Fathers understood the connection between morality and freedom. I’m not sure why you don’t. If you don’t have that basic ingredient, then you have nothing and you never will. That is your target.


48 posted on 07/07/2009 6:08:33 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey
Only by taking the fight TO them, on our terms, can we defeat this enemy.

The only terms you possess that distinguish you, are your principles. So, how is that different from what I'm talking about?

49 posted on 07/07/2009 6:11:16 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey
LIBs are an enemy that must be destroyed.

Liberals are not the enemy. People are not born liberal. Your enemy is an idea.

For all the huffing and puffing from some of you on this thread, you don't seem to understand the nature of the enemy very well...

50 posted on 07/07/2009 6:22:07 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson