Posted on 07/04/2009 6:40:03 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
Dear Sarah,
Please forgive my presumption in writing you, but since no one else seems willing or capable of saying these things, which I think sorely need saying, and since they concern you, and what this country is all about, namely: freedom, individuality, and character, I've taken this liberty and beg your indulgence.
I'm somewhat appalled by all those who publicly and privately have presumed to know what prompted your decision to step down as Governor of the State of Alaska, and even more appalled by those who presume to tell you what you now ought, or even must do. Not one of them, it seems to me, is concerned about you, but what you can be or do for them. It is obvious to me that all of them consider you some kind of political pawn to be used, directly or indirectly, for their own political ends. It is disgusting that so many cannot think except in terms of politics, particularly party politics.
It may seem strange, therefore, that what I want to write about is party politics—though not so much about it, as against it.
Let me tell you something I know that may have bewildered you, but knowing the kind of mind you have, maybe not. If you have wondered why there seem to be so many people who hold such negative views toward you and yours (I'm being kind to many whose expressions are outright hate), it is because they perceive you as a threat. I know that will surprise you, as it does many who have experienced the same. What may surprise you even more is what there is about you that threatens them.
It is your character—your undaunted and uncompromising willingness to live by your principles. Your obvious sense of personal integrity and responsibility, your certainty in the face of crises or decision, and most of all, your frank unapologetic stand for what you believe terrifies them—because they know what is, though they will never name it, it is called independence. And that is an indictment of all they are, because they are by nature compromisers, dependent on the approval, agreement, and sanctioning of others. They live for the praise of others and will sacrifice anything to that; the individual that will say what is right and do what is right, and doesn't need their approval or agreement, is their worst enemy.
Ayn Rand said it best. "It is hatred of the good, for being the good."
Perhaps you think I admire you—if you think that, you would be correct. What I admire you for is the very thing others despise you for. (I'm sorry they do, but you could not be the kind of person you are without raising the ire of the least among us—which is what they are.)
As a fellow human being, a fellow American, and a lover of individual liberty, I cannot help being interested in you and what you do, so long as your life is a "public" one. I also cannot help being concerned for you and yours and for the principles you both hold and live by. I do not, however, feel privileged to address these things at a personal level, and certainly am in no position to advise you, so I will address these things in terms of the principles.
Perhaps you will allow me to quote someone else I admire, Thomas Jefferson, who wrote, "If I could not go to Heaven but with a party I would not go there at all." Nevertheless, it was party politics that got Jefferson elected as the second President of The United States.
But there is a lesson in that. The United States Government, under the Constitution, was not designed for party politics. Madison, who literally wrote the Constitution, meant for elections to truly be the means for the people to choose their leaders. Elections were not meant to choose policy represented by parties. That is the primary difference between a representative republic and a "democracy."
But it was Jefferson's election that changed this country from a "republic" to a "democracy," because it was really a "party" that was elected, not individual leaders.
As I know you will recall, in the presidential election of 1800, Jefferson had chosen Aaron Burr to be his vice presidential Democratic-Republican party running mate against the Federalist party’s John Adams. Jefferson’s seventy-three electoral votes easily defeated John Adam’s sixty-five votes, but Aaron Burr also received seventy-three electoral votes. The electoral college had not been set up for formal party politics, so, to determine which candidate, Burr or Jefferson, would be president, the election was sent to the House of Representatives.
The Federalists in Congress favored Burr over Jefferson and for six days neither received a majority vote in the house. Not until Alexander Hamilton, in spite of his opposition to Jefferson, supported him over his fellow New Yorker, Burr, whom he bitterly hated, was the election finally resolved with Jefferson the winner on February 17, 1801.
The grand plan had already failed. The second President of the United States was not elected as the representative of the people, but appointed by the decision of Congress led by the arch politician and compromiser, Alexander Hamilton. Party politics has ruled the country ever since.
Jefferson said something else. "Whenever a man has cast a longing eye on office, a rottenness begins in his conduct."
While Jefferson did not explain this, it is the nature of politics itself that makes it true. "Politics is the art of compromise," which means, "it is the art of sacrificing principle to the politically expedient," and the day one begins to seek political office they have to begin acting and speaking in ways that will garner the favor and approval of his political party and the electorate.
Not all compromise is wrong, but almost all political compromise is wrong, because it is always a compromise between some right government action (based on the principles of individual liberty, property, and justice) and some wrong government action (based on some collective or "socialist" view of man involving redistribution of wealth, government meddling in the economy, or a violation of property rights and individual liberty).
That kind of compromise is a compromise between the truth and a lie, a compromise between good and evil, and in every such compromise the truth and the good loose. Again, Ayn Rand said it best:
"In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit."
There are other ways to say it. "It is always wrong to do wrong. It is never right to do wrong to get a chance to do right." Another: You cannot make poison safe by adding some food to it and you cannot make a lie right by adding some truth to it—such action only makes both more dangerous.
This is the art of politics, a disgusting continuous watering down of truth and virtue, and a continuous compromise between freedom and oppression, between liberty and slavery, between individualism and collectivism, which has brought this country to the brink of totalitarian statism.
I do not believe it is possible to be a politician today without being corrupted by this process. If there are one or two that stand above it all, none of what they stand for will have any influence on the political process, and they will, for the most part, be despised and repudiated, especially by those who claim to be for freedom and individualism and true liberty, but are in fact political compromisers and moral lepers.
It is because I regard you as both an American hero and moral hero that I write you. I have no advice for you, except to do what you know is right, which I know is just what you will do. Whatever you choose, I understand one thing few understand today, your life is your own and belongs to no one except those with whom you choose to share or devote it. No one belongs "to the people," or "to a party," or "to their constituency." The essence of freedom is, every individual owns their own life and they owe no man anything but what is required of all civilized human beings: respect, honesty, and decency.
I wish you the best of everything in life, because you have earned it. I leave you with one more quote by Jefferson:
"The happiest moments of my life have been the few which I have passed at home in the bosom of my family." It is the pursuit of "happiness," after all, he regarded as a fundamental freedom, as do I. Please be free.
Sincerely yours,
Reginald Firehammer
(If you want on or off this list please freepmail me.)
If you do not understand the philosophy of this post, you really do not understand what philosophy is.
Did you know that both Jefferson and Adams died on this date?
Hank
Good, but I doubt Sara Palin will read it.
Jefferson, of course, was not the second president.
Nice Note, and, to Sarah if she reads this, know that we all have your back.
How about the short version? Too much going on...watching Sarah on FOX....
Say what you will, this lady knows what she is doing. I’, sure the negativity is daunting to her, but she’s been there and done that. She is a much larger and capable person than those who belittle her. She is a child of God, therefore she is well fortified to face whatever may come. She is a doer. She wants to make a difference, and do we ever need a difference! She is that rare type of individual who acts on “if good men do nothing” principle. I support Sarah Palin no matter where she chooses to go from here. God bless her, guide her and keep her.
Good letter.
The second president was Adams. Jefferson was the third president.
True...he was the ninth.
She is already married!
Actually, Elias Boudinot was the 2nd President; Thomas Mifflin, the 3rd.
And the author of the article gets the definitions of republic and democracy all fouled up, too.
I still hope for her POTUS in 2012. Maybe she could move to Texas and defeat Perry and Kay Baily. She can tell the Alaska Rats, like Davy Crockett, You can go to Hell, I’m going to Texas. She has our prayers and hope we can save our poor nation.
barbra ann
You can go to Hell, I’m going to Texas
////////////////
Davy’s political career did not benefit.
Governor Palin, should you read this very supportive letter, please respond. It will bring the FreeP into a great support network for you.
Fingers crossed...
Nicely done! Perhaps it should be snail-mailed directly to the Palin home...
Thanks for the ping.
A child of God she is and our God is conservative.
Are you Reginald, Hank? ... It is a well thought out and even more finely stated message. Kudos my FRiend. It is Sarah’s character that spurs the hate, indeed!
An OUTSTANDING letter to Sarah! Hooray Reginald Firehammer!
Thanks very much for posting, Hank.
Thanks for the ping!
If Sarah Palin decides to run for President and wins, I hope she spends her first six months making conservative values the law of the land. And why not?
Obama has forced his leftist ideas down our throats in his short six months in office. Hopefully his destructive plans can be overturned in the same amount of time. All things are possible with God.
God, yes! It has been corrected in the original, but nothing can be corrected on FR. Don’t every make a mistake here, or you’ll live with it forever.
Thanks for the comment.
Hank
So am I. But we can be friends. ;>)
Reginald Firehammer
sounds like a teenager in puppy love.
Oh, what a great label of what we've lived through for the last 8 years...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.