To: reaganaut1
We need to go back to the supreme court on carbon. The pollutant finding must be challened. As their is dissent within their own organization, on endangerment. It might make the court more receptive to rehearing this arguement.
2 posted on
07/04/2009 4:37:09 AM PDT by
wbones8765
("Give me liberty or give me death")
To: wbones8765
As I remember, when the Court decided the carbon case, much of the scientific dissent from the Gore position had not been fully articulated. It is being more and more articulated now, indeed to the point that it's intellectually irresponsible to say that there is any real “consensus” on what the science is. Since the original majority based its decision on what it thought the science was, Kennedy, at least, might be persuaded to change his view about the science and, thus, to change the Court's view.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson