Second, the monthly payroll report, like the one issued today, is full of largely coincident data. However, it does have one piece of leading data: the length of the work week. This is generally considered a leading indicator because employers will tend to adjust the number of hours their employees work before hiring or firing them. For example, it would be normal for companies to begin to pay existing workers overtime before they hire additional workers because of the uncertainty related to the initial upturn in a production or service cycle.
However, commentators rarely highlight the length of the work week when discussing the monthly employment report.
What has been happening to the length of the work week? It has hit all-time lows the last two months. That’s right. The only official leading indicator in the employment report has hit all-time lows the last two months. Who has reported that? No one.
http://www.businessinsider.com/richard-bernstein-why-is-weak-employment-a-surprise-2009-7
As the Freeper who invented the term, “frippery slope” (had to toot my horn!) I don’t believe we can recover jobs quickly because of the nature of our jobs nowadays. IMHO, too many jobs in the last two decades or so have been “frippery”, something unnecessary. Only bloated demand and over-heated economy and easy credit made those jobs occur.
parsy, who if he can’t continue surviving, plans on whining like a titty-baby for a government check.
When you calculate in the number of people who have run out of employment benefits or have taken part time jobs, the unemployment rate is 16.5%.
How is that hope and change working for you Obamabots?