Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/02/2009 2:43:01 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Scanian

Here’s another excellent debunking article, from about a year ago at Family Security Matters. It provides quick and fact-based overviews of the absurdities of ethanol, sugar cane, biodiesel, switchgrass, green algae, and electric cars:

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.506,css.print/pub_detail.asp


2 posted on 07/02/2009 2:53:47 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

No new coal plants, no new nukes = severe power shortages in a couple of decades. Obama’s Hope Energy Policy.

It’s the California Plan.


3 posted on 07/02/2009 3:00:30 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian
I know of an electrical firm that services these dreamboat, pie-in-the-sky pieces of crap.

They are not only 25% efficient, (of their rated capacity at best) but the maintenance on them is extremely expensive and excessive. they are also very difficult and costly to tie into the main grid. What little power they produce and the unrealistic land area they require, creates incredible instability in the main grid. The more of them there are, the more problems they represent.

The same goes for Solar Power, which is beyond ridiculous when even compared to Wind. the statistical facts are this; For every standard Coal plant, it takes 1,750 times the land area of Wind Turbines (10,000 turbines) to equal the output of just one Coal, Nuclear, or Natural Gas plant. In regards to Solar, it takes 177,000 times the land area to equal one Standard electrical plant.

These ridiculous facts are not even remotely being published to the public, who still believes that these energy sources will soon replace the old Planet killing methods and far surpass all of our energy needs. The only thing that has kept that from happening in the past, was that those evil Republicans and greedy Oil/Coal companies have kept the Democrats from giving it to us. Which is what even the media has reported.

And the brain dead public keeps on buying it.

6 posted on 07/02/2009 3:34:56 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Give me LIBERTY or give me an M-24A2!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

What happens when there is too much wind? A tornado would not be too good for windmills.


10 posted on 07/02/2009 3:50:05 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian; All
Ummm...I thought YOU were the one who was supposed to shut the windmills off before the storm came in...
11 posted on 07/02/2009 3:51:45 AM PDT by rlmorel ("The Road to Serfdom" by F.A.Hayek - Read it...today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

Bookmark


14 posted on 07/02/2009 3:58:13 AM PDT by corlorde (New Hampshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

And when there is no wind to turn the turbines, they turn with electricity. Makes sense, don't it/sarc

15 posted on 07/02/2009 3:58:29 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

redone

Go nuclear, Save the Raptors : (

http://www.wind-watch.org/news/2008/07/24/new-data-shows-bird-kills-up-in-altamont/

http://www.windaction.org/documents/13936

http://www.nationalwind.org/publications/wildlife/avian98/03-Hunt-Golden_Eagles.pdf

http://www.wind-works.org/articles/NRELBirdReport04.html


18 posted on 07/02/2009 4:06:05 AM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (Hey there, White House Ha Ha Charade you are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian
Photobucket
24 posted on 07/02/2009 4:57:39 AM PDT by Jackknife (Chuck Norris grinds his coffee with his teeth, and boils his water with his rage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

Why is it that they never want to talk about nuclear power? Never want to include it in any solutions. They cannot agree with one another, on where to build wind, or solar farms. They want them built even though they are inefficient, for the square area being used. Nuclear does not have that inefficiency, but they refuse it all together. Does that make any sense? NOPE!!!


25 posted on 07/02/2009 5:00:54 AM PDT by wbones8765 ("Give me liberty or give me death")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

Excellent explanation of the engineering realities of wind power. Thanks for posting it!


27 posted on 07/02/2009 5:12:39 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian
So you know those Canadain geese that keep flying into airplane engines?

What do you think a flock of them would do to a wind farm?
What effect on the environment would be caused by the shift in the path of migratory birds?
Do we need a 10-year impact study?

30 posted on 07/02/2009 5:31:03 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (The sun glinted off chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weight-lifting sessions each week and...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

Forget about the liberal ‘reduce greenhouse gases’ part of the diatribe against windmills. They are cost effective and produce lots of jobs. Turbine production has sprung up in the northern plains. Its too expensive to ship turbine blades all the way from Europe so they are now building them here. Jobs are created to build the towers and maintain them. Farmers make extra money by leasing part of their land to the company who operates the windmills. Normal farming goes on right around the windmills, very little land is lost from farm production.


36 posted on 07/02/2009 6:10:38 AM PDT by RadiationRomeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian
Windmills not only need a minimum wind speed to generate electricity, but also get shut down when the the wind is too strong as the massive turbine blades cannot take the stress of high winds. Here is a video that shows the results when a wind turbine does not shut down in high winds.
37 posted on 07/02/2009 6:13:05 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

And at the same time we are ripping down hydro-electric dams.


38 posted on 07/02/2009 6:15:34 AM PDT by Tribune7 (Better to convert enemies to allies than to destroy them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

I think we all know Obama has had plans to halt our nation’s production of long-range intercepting missiles. And we also know that the Palm Springs area has been using those large turbines for wind energy for quite some time.

Could it be possible that Obama has secret plans to erect turbines up at Vandenberg in the hope that he can thwart any incoming threat with a good blow?


53 posted on 07/02/2009 9:35:52 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

In Texas there is 8000+ MW of wind generation.
Last week when ERCOT was close to peak load, there was 300 MW of wind generation.

Idiots are buying “green power” because it makes them feel special.


92 posted on 07/03/2009 7:04:59 PM PDT by hadaclueonce ("Endeavor to persevere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

113 posted on 07/07/2009 5:02:00 AM PDT by steelyourfaith ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" - Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson