Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skimbell

A weak article compared to Sowell’s usual. I can hear Gomer Pyle in the background going “S’prise, s’prise!” What he fails to mention is that, whether you like Bush or not (I do), he left things in a helluva mess, with no apparent successor to carry on his positions. Every one of the R candidates ran against Bush as much as against the Dems. S’prise, s’prise, RNC.

The shame of it is that there even *IS* a liberal element of the Republican party, given what he says in the last part of the article about Reagan and Conservatism. We got Obama because we lost our way and forgot our history.


7 posted on 06/28/2009 6:40:19 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bigbob
Yes, apparently none of the 2008 candidates decided to act like they would continue any of the Bush policies, at least the good ones. Maybe that's why the turnout was so weak and divided among so many candidates.

And a good indication of how far out of touch the candidates in both parties are with the country.

8 posted on 06/28/2009 6:45:00 AM PDT by Bernard (If you always tell the truth, you never have to remember exactly what you said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
Exactly!

If Bush would have been more conservative, and followed the principles of conservativism, Obama would not have seen the light of day.

The party is in disarray because we have so many republicans want to just get along.

17 posted on 06/28/2009 6:54:33 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson