Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Talent, Kinder endorse Blunt for U.S. Senate (MO)
St. Louis Today ^ | 06.20.2009

Posted on 06/22/2009 8:29:17 AM PDT by wk4bush2004

Two prominent Republicans today endorsed the bid of U.S. Rep. Roy Blunt for the U.S. Senate.

The Associated Press reported that former U.S. Sen. Jim Talent and Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder announced their support for the Congressman’s campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: 2009endorsements; mo2010; royblunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
I respect Blunt, being a Congressman and being a former president of my alma mater, but he's been in DC way too long and carries a TON of baggage. Plus, the Blunt name has been severely tarnished here in Missouri.

I am shocked that the Missouri GOP thinks that Blunt can beat Robin Carnahan. We need someone stronger than Blunt.

I live in southwest Missouri and Sarah Steelman remains extremely popular here. Looking at the August 2008 GOP primary results, she won all of southwest Missouri, much of the Kansas City area, and parts of the northwest.

I really think Steelman should run for the Senate seat and NOT for Blunt's Congressional seat; that looks like it will be a very crowded field.

I think Steelman's got the ability to beat Carnahan. The Missouri GOP has to get out of their "anointed-one-la-la-land" and look at someone who can actually win!

1 posted on 06/22/2009 8:29:17 AM PDT by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

I could go for a blunt right now.


2 posted on 06/22/2009 8:35:48 AM PDT by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004; 1stMarylandRegiment; 47carollann; A Citizen Reporter; A Cyrenian; adrian; AFLoggie; ...
Missouri ping

Low volume ping list

FReepmail me to be on, or off, this list.

Personally, I think it's time for fresh blood all around in Congress.

3 posted on 06/22/2009 8:37:50 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Roy Blunt. Worst. Republican. Whip. Ever.


4 posted on 06/22/2009 8:39:16 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Isn’t Blunt a big RINO?


5 posted on 06/22/2009 8:39:22 AM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

We need term limits badly


6 posted on 06/22/2009 8:44:00 AM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matginzac

No kiddin !


7 posted on 06/22/2009 8:44:53 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

Agree. Blunt was just the “next guy in line”.

To be fair, Blunt will have the party unified behind him, and he’ll have no problem with money, and he “checks all the boxes” in terms of conservative issues....he’s just part of the ‘old boys club’ in Missouri politics.


8 posted on 06/22/2009 8:50:23 AM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Steelman may be taking one for the party in the interest of avoiding a bitter primary fight. The GOP needs to avoid that in order to present the strongest possible front to Carnahan.


9 posted on 06/22/2009 8:59:55 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
To be fair, Blunt will have the party unified behind him, and he’ll have no problem with money, and he “checks all the boxes” in terms of conservative issues....he’s just part of the ‘old boys club’ in Missouri politics.

Almost makes you wonder if the Missouri GOP has already written off the Senate seat. Carnahan is going to be hard to beat; she took 62% in a statewide race last year. The GOP needs an A-list candidate and I doubt that Blount is it.

10 posted on 06/22/2009 9:03:28 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: matginzac

Thas a fac jac ..... But so many here will disagree. Seems like there once was a man (I use that term loosely name John McLame another with an R behind his name ..... people here flocked to him


11 posted on 06/22/2009 9:05:52 AM PDT by HiramQuick (work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: matginzac
While I don't think Blunt is a RINO like these guys.
I do think he was a Bush Lap-dog as he voted for anything the administration wanted. He voted for the Medicare drug bill, the No Child Left Behind Act, The Farm Bill and The Highway Bill. Blunt also defends the use of earmarks.

The worst part of Blunt is that he voted for both TARPS!!!

The only way for the Republicans to win is to restore confidence in the 2 party system. There needs to be a purge of any and all tax and spend Republicans like Blunt. Then during the run-up to the elections the Republicans should run against TARP and an out of control establishment government. The jewel in their campaign needs to be term-limits.
12 posted on 06/22/2009 9:06:59 AM PDT by RC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004
I agree and I am generally suspicious of Blunt. I do not know if he is a RINO or a conservative. I recieved an email from Kit Bond stating he is a conservative by pointing out a view conservative positions, but nothing showing a conservative philosophy.

What is puzzling is Conyers supported Specter before he bolted, supported Crist without considering Rubio, but has only given a statement that he is "pleased" that Blunt is running. I don't know if that is a good thing a moron like Conyers hasn't supported Blunt or a bad thing that Blunt can't make the same cut as Specter and Crist.

13 posted on 06/22/2009 9:12:19 AM PDT by 11th Commandment (Proud Member of the DHS radical list since 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Roy Blunt is part of the problem. He needs to go.


14 posted on 06/22/2009 9:14:27 AM PDT by Augie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Steelman may be taking one for the party in the interest of avoiding a bitter primary fight. The GOP needs to avoid that in order to present the strongest possible front to Carnahan.

Sounds like the GOP thinks they can win by eliminating choices and then counting on that conservatives will show up and vote for Blunt because Obama will have screwed things up so badly we will vote for Satan as long as he has an R after his name.

This is very very RISKY on the Missouri GOP establishment's part. Mr. Blunt will have to earn my vote, not get it by default.

15 posted on 06/22/2009 9:19:36 AM PDT by 11th Commandment (Proud Member of the DHS radical list since 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Steelman may be taking one for the party in the interest of avoiding a bitter primary fight. The GOP needs to avoid that in order to present the strongest possible front to Carnahan.

Carnahan will be able to paint Blunt as the worst Washington insider, backroom dealing, Bush sycophant.

Steelman/Carnahan Woman vs woman, both outside of the Washington stench.

Go Sarah!

16 posted on 06/22/2009 9:22:56 AM PDT by listenhillary (90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Lets see. The race will be Nixon & Carnahan vs Bush & Blunt. Currently, the people of the Show Me State aren’t in love with Matt BLunt and GW Bush.

Shame, Steeleman ditched the run fo Senate in favor of Blunt’s house seat.


17 posted on 06/22/2009 9:30:09 AM PDT by yongin (Proud Infidel in the Kingdom of Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004
The Missouri GOP has to get out of their "anointed-one-la-la-land" and look at someone who can actually win!

You know for a fact Steelman can actually win? I'm in S.E. Mo. and know nothing about her capabilities.

I had a call from the Blunt campaign and that guy and I had some disagreements. He wanted money now, but I told him I wasn't going to support Blunt until Blunt convinced me he was something other than a moderate democrap.

18 posted on 06/22/2009 9:31:58 AM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yongin

I wonder if she even has support of the state GOP for the house seat?

I have little use any more for anything branded with GOP’s name.


19 posted on 06/22/2009 9:33:35 AM PDT by listenhillary (90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HiramQuick

Well, I didn’t “flock” to John McCain ,but I voted for him because I had enought common sense to know he or anyone would do less harm than this poser that won. I’m getting tired of being bashed for voting against “That One”.


20 posted on 06/22/2009 9:39:07 AM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson