Skip to comments.The Darwin/Trotsky connection
Posted on 06/17/2009 8:19:30 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Leon Trotsky (18791940) was the organizer, propagandist, and military leader of the communist seizure of power in Russia following the revolution of 1917. He was communist dictator Lenin's heir apparent, until Stalin usurped this position. Intolerant, tactless and impatient, Trotsky had an unbounded faith in Marxism, which was reinforced by his uncritical acceptance of Darwinism...
(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...
Thanks for the ping!
“his uncritical acceptance of Darwinism.”
Guilt by association is a typical ploy used for character assassination.
Hitler was a vegetarian.
Therefore, anyone who is a vegetarian must be a Nazi, using your 'logic.'
I would suggest you blame the horrors of Communism on ... Communism, instead of playing your banal guilt-by-association game.
Carl Marx borrowed Stalin’s Darwin and ran over your Atheism.
Hitler believed in and used Newtonian physics to bomb London. The Bible says nothing of Newtonian physics or gravity, therefore, by extension, Newtonian physics must be a hoax and anyone who believes in it is the same as Hitler.
Let’s play Bible. I’ll be David you can be Goliath.
You should watch out for the whole ‘pride’ thing..
I’ve got a better idea, all is fair in love and war.
Not sure what you are hinting at but regarding 'your Atheism'... Alamo-Girl is a fine Christian woman, and although we disagree on a bunch of stuff, I know she is no atheist. These games of labeling folks atheist or comparing them to Hitler, Marx or whoever because of divergent opinions on science (I am not even sure where Alamo-Girl stands) is ridiculous and not exactly a witness attitude.
Hitleer was a Darwiniac, vegetarian, environmentalist, who viewed the Jews as non-native species.
Whose character are you worried about?
So, once again, vegetarians must be Nazis.
Actually not, he was a part of the occult Thule society which twisted various religious beliefs including Norse mythology and even Christianity, to say that god(s) created different types of humans, one race superior to the others.
You make a good point. Anybody who accepts Darwoood’s unscientific creation myth must do so uncritically.
I think that was a poorly conceived spoof on “I borrowed your karma and ran over your dogma,” but I can’t really be certain. It doesn’t make sense at all.
My Sincerest apologies to alamo-girl where-ever you are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.