Posted on 06/13/2009 5:08:08 PM PDT by Maelstorm
The British mom who expressed concern about her son being placed in foster care with two homosexuals (See article.) has good reason to be concerned. Research shows that children raised in homosexual homes are 7 times more likely to be homosexual. What's the surprise? Children learn what they live.
Children of alcoholics are more likely to abuse alcohol. The same with drug abuse. So why the pretense that placing children with homosexuals has no impact on the development of their sexual identities? It's one more big, politically correct lie. Which leads one to ask, what is the real agenda of the child care industry that forces gay adoption and gay foster care? Certainly it is not the well-being of children.
It is an abomination to place children with homosexual couples. The same culture that screamed bloody murder about child sex abuse by priests (while hiding the fact that it was mostly homosexual abuse) makes it a civil right for gays to adopt and do foster care. The dysfunctional child care industry is actively cooperating with the deviants by giving them a sort of preferred status. Political correctness meet reality. Homosexuality is bad for kids -- unless, of course, those placing children desire a homosexual outcome or play let's pretend to fit in with the politically correct popular culture that wants to deny the reality that homosexuality is disordered.
As far as homosexuals seeking to adopt and do foster care, I think "reproducing" is exactly what this is all about. True love engenders the desire to create new life. The perverted lust that masquerades as love engenders a distorted image of that human desire. Homosexuals can't "make a baby" except through recruitment. (Lesbians of course do it by enlisting the support of a third, opposite-sex person, and then pretend the baby is "theirs.")
Historically, pederasty is a major means for homosexuals to reproduce themselves so to speak: introduce the young to deviant sexual practices, ply them with liquor, immerse them in pornography, sexually molest and sodomize them, and Voila! you have "given birth" to another homosexual like yourself. And then you pretend it's for the good of the child. "Sex before 8 or else it's too late, as the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) motto goes."
The fact that the culture promotes and enables this is just one more indication of a society suffering from insanity. Unfortunately, the guys in the white coats are, for the most part, the biggest psychos of all. How else can you explain the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removing homosexuality from the list of psychological disorders in 1973 because of homosexual lobbying. It was a political, not a medical, decision. (Gay activist Franklin Komeny was instrumental in bullying the vote.)
For a while gay gene theory was promoted, but the other APA (American Psychological Association) in their latest brochure backs off from the gay gene theory. The homosexuals are pooh-poohing the change saying that the gay gene theory was never seriously accepted and what's all the fuss about the new language? It's just those nasty homophobes trying to use it to stop hate crimes legislation! Hey, whatever floats the gay loveboat.
But back to my main point. The fact is that, if research shows kids raised in gay families are more likely to be gay, it is pretty significant evidence that homosexuality is taught and chosen by its adherents. Those who truly care about children will want to see them placed in loving heterosexual adoptive and foster families where their sexual identities will not be distorted by perversion.
Mary Ann Kreitzer is a founder of the Catholic Media Coalition and writes at Les Femmes-The Truth.
There is a saying, environment is stronger than willpower.
The first lie they told was that homosexuality was an identity, not a behavior.
It is why they ignore and bury stories about people who are no longer homosexual.
The disorder only survives because it is promoted heavily.
bookmark
BTTT!
Good article.
The gaystapo must be defeated.
It is horrible and it is like one of those horror movies. People see the obscene nature of it and then repeat programmed defenses of what they would never accept otherwise. I have gay friends but sometimes I think that those who claim to have such friends no idea what kind of personal turmoil is involved. Just because one does not hate gays does not mean one has to support the ugly activism or the lies that attempt to normalize it. It isn’t as if this is the only thing left in the closet. I hear the most idiotic arguments in defense of homosexuality, freedom this and freedom that, equality this and equality that when the people making such arguments quickly prove they know nothing about the meaning of any of those things. We have to rise up on this like we did on global warming and abortion. We can not just hold the line at marriage because they will wear us down. We have to push back with the truth and convince another generation how much is at stake. We also need to push back against costly sexual liberalism (homosexual and heterosexual) on all fronts. It is more costly in disease and dysfunction to society than smoking and obesity combined but no one seems to notice. Most of the problems in society would shrink if two parent Mom and Dad families and sexual restraint were encouraged throughout the whole of society. Morality is not an option in a free society.
I thought it was a third category of gender with subcategories. -(humor)
Little by little. All it takes is dissemination of information. People have been led to believe that only religious nuts disagree with homosexuals. That is a fiction that can be dispelled.
Things are getting more interesting. We, on the right, always preach adoption in lieu of abortion. Now I wonder if it’s not better for the kid to stay with his/her teenage mother, rather than being placed with a gay couple. Maybe we need to re-calibrate, given what government is now doing?
Kids living with gay parents are also subject to more abuse. Especially boys living with lesbians, and in particular from the one(s) that aren’t the birth parent, if one is one.
This is my only real concern with “gay” marriage. I do NOT want children adopted or fostered into this lifestyle.
Hey, you wanna be a but-bandit? Knock yourself out; but don’t expect me to allow children to be forced into your perversion.
They are born that way, unless they are raised that way.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that!
It is absolutely astounding what has transpired recently regarding the stripping of a child from able bodied blood relatives to give them to homosexuals as foster parents. The reasoning given is so flimsy and fluid that it’s not beyond the pale to imagine ANY excuse used to divest parents of their own children for the homosexual agenda. I never thought I’d see this day in my own lifetime, but it’s happening.
The most horrible part is it is entirely without reason. What we are witnessing is the slow death of reason. People even some among us here can not reason. They float around on ideas of freedom and liberty and have no comprehension of what either of those things are. It is frustrating but the fight must go on.
Why was the child in foster care? It is all well and good that his mother is concerned about the child being around homosexuals, but is she had her act together then the child wouldn’t be in that situation. If she wants to point fingers she needs to look in the mirror first.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.