I wanted to emphasize that these weren't form embryonic stem cells.
It’s a good thing we didn’t divert significant amounts of funding into Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Oh, wait ...
Rules for Lefty Journalists:
If a criminal politician is a Democrat, never print the (D), but always figure a way to work the word “Republican” into the story....
If an effective treatment uses Adult Stem Cells, never print the word “Adult”, but always try to work the word “Embryonic” into the story...
This is another example how adult stem cells are solving the problems which is why embryonic stem research shouldn’t be allowed.
There’s a private outfit down in San Diego that does this. They have a Japanese partner...they use liposuction to extract bulk fat, then they purify the adipocytes, etc. and magnify them in some kind of MEM solution.
And then the therapeutic subFraction is re-injected back into the same person later, thereby avoiding compatibility problems.
No kids are harmed, and there are no teratoma-type complications of course.
You CAN’T cure diseases without killing babies. The debate is OVER.
Interesting bookmark.
Big Bump!
You’ll have to donate some of your fat rdb3!
Notice this little sleight of hand or in this case words:
“Meanwhile scientists are claiming a major breakthrough in generating safer stem cells from adult cells.
Scientists usually use a virus to make the switch but this makes the resulting stem cells incredibly dangerous for use in humans as they can cause cancer.”
Safer cells from adult stem cells? Resulting stem cells?
Two different things combined to confuse adult and embryonic cells in a typically dishonest effort.
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
They never say “adult” stem cells in these headlines, do they?
Joya ping