Where to begin? I could write for a day or maybe a week. This is the worst stem cell story that I ever read. You only avoid the major problem of rejection in transplantation medicine when donors are the recipients of their own adult stem cells. Human embryonic stem cell research has had no clinical utility. What do they think they will learn from human/animal chimeras? God only knows. I wouldn't go there.
1 posted on
06/10/2009 11:38:47 AM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
You really have to dig in to this article to see that virtually all advances have been made using ADULT stem cells. Which makes the assertion that Obama’s lifting of the embryonic stem cell funding ban will allow America to catch up to Britain appear rather absurd, and misleading too.
2 posted on
06/10/2009 11:44:34 AM PDT by
Elpasser
To: neverdem
Praise the Lord. I hope they help a lot of people/
3 posted on
06/10/2009 12:19:21 PM PDT by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: neverdem
You seem to knowledgeable about this subject, so maybe you can shed light on a question I have always wondered about concerning the controversy over embryonic stem cells. Is there any difference between the stem cells of an aborted baby and a miscarried baby?
4 posted on
06/10/2009 12:45:27 PM PDT by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
To: neverdem
You know the word game. Adult stem cells have success so they are just stem cells to be grouped together with embryonic cells which has none.
It like saying my neighbor has a hundred dollars and I have none but on average the two of us have fifty dollars each.
However my wallet is still empty despite my average money.
5 posted on
06/10/2009 1:02:10 PM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson