Skip to comments.
McCain deserts Palin again on oil drilling in Arctic refuge
McClatchy ^
| 2009-06-09
| Erika Bolstad
Posted on 06/09/2009 5:26:25 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
WASHINGTON Remember back to September, when Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was a newly minted vice-presidential candidate and she was asked by ABC's Charlie Gibson about drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and her split with her running mate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
At the time, she told Gibson: "We'll agree to disagree, but I'm gonna keep pushing that, and I think, eventually, we're all gonna come together on that one."
Apparently Palin wasn't persuasive enough. Tuesday, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee shot down Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski's effort to open up ANWR to directional drilling. The sole Republican to vote against the proposal? McCain.
(Excerpt) Read more at miamiherald.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 111th; anwr; chucklestheclown; energy; mcbama; mccain; mccain4alqaeda; mccainantigop; mccainantipalin; mccaintruthfile; mcqueeg; mcrino; oil; palin; rino; rino5thcolumn; senate; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-108 next last
To: Dick Bachert; 50mm; stockpirate; Eaker; ducdriver; ChrisInAR; AvOrdVet; MaggieCarta; indylindy; ...
|
|
The Juan McCain Truth File. "I have great respect for Al Gore." John McCain, October 2, 2008 FR Keywords: mccaintruthfile, mcqueeg, mcbama Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords. This can be a very high-volume ping list at times. To join the ping list: FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add mccaintruthfile. (Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop mccaintruthfile.) Republican Commissars Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the delusional rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of pragmatic conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless RNC shills who simply want to meet a new overlord. |
|
2
posted on
06/09/2009 5:26:44 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" Patrick Henry)
To: rabscuttle385
McCain is an idiot.
3
posted on
06/09/2009 5:28:56 PM PDT
by
Chgogal
(American Mugabe, get your arse out of my bank and get your arse out of my car!)
To: rabscuttle385
McCain is a debit to our Party.
4
posted on
06/09/2009 5:29:11 PM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: rabscuttle385
Palin, Shift to Independent Please, kkthx PING!
5
posted on
06/09/2009 5:29:44 PM PDT
by
cranked
To: rabscuttle385
There is no rational reason for not drilling there.
6
posted on
06/09/2009 5:29:45 PM PDT
by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: rabscuttle385
I hate the sight of that miserable worm McCain.
Did he win the primary in Arizona or is that next year?
7
posted on
06/09/2009 5:30:25 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(God guts and guns made America great. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
To: rabscuttle385
Whew. That was close. And to think we almost elected this guy President.
8
posted on
06/09/2009 5:30:54 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: rabscuttle385
9
posted on
06/09/2009 5:31:00 PM PDT
by
LibFreeOrDie
(Obama promised a gold mine, but he will give us the shaft.)
To: rabscuttle385
Palin should stick a fork in Juan.
10
posted on
06/09/2009 5:31:11 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: rabscuttle385
McStain needs to dry up and blow away.
Whats left of the Republican party is already
on its knees, thanks to the RINOS like the Stain.
11
posted on
06/09/2009 5:31:31 PM PDT
by
AlexW
(Now in the Philippines . Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
To: TADSLOS; cripplecreek; TigersEye; DoughtyOne
12
posted on
06/09/2009 5:31:55 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" Patrick Henry)
To: Texas Eagle
The ‘rat control of Congress is the real restriction on drilling here and now. I’ve heard that it will be 10 yrs before we get any oil anyway.
13
posted on
06/09/2009 5:32:31 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: ZULU; AuntB
Next year. And I hope Simcox...or Deakin...or Hayworth, if he chooses to run, beats the crap out of him.
14
posted on
06/09/2009 5:32:37 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" Patrick Henry)
To: Paladin2
Ive heard that it will be 10 yrs before we get any oil anyway. Yeah. That's what they were saying 10 years ago.
15
posted on
06/09/2009 5:34:29 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: rabscuttle385
John McCain is a sack of horse crap. I donated for the first time in my life to a campaign..only after he chose Sarah. Now this sack of crap votes against drilling, something Sarah has been fighting for for years. I know Sarah will never say a bad thing about McCain because she feels some kind of obligation to him for selecting her..but I wonder in private, when no one is around to tape record her or hear her, what she really thinks of this ass clown
To: rabscuttle385
McCain is a jackass. (yea either one)
17
posted on
06/09/2009 5:34:44 PM PDT
by
svcw
To: rabscuttle385
18
posted on
06/09/2009 5:35:09 PM PDT
by
shooter223
(the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)
To: Always Right
There is no rational
reason for not drilling there. Eliminates McCains opinion. ;-)
19
posted on
06/09/2009 5:35:50 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(The invitation for salvation always requires an RSVP.)
To: rabscuttle385
Congress doing the bidding of its environmentalist masters. This country and its government have been going downhill for the last forty years.
20
posted on
06/09/2009 5:35:55 PM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by governments. You've been warned.)
To: rabscuttle385
Somehow this does not surprise me. McCain has always been an idiot and now he is proving that beyond a shadow of a doubt.
It’s no wonder his daughter acts like she does, her gene pool was not dug that deep or filled with clean water. In fact, I’d say her pool is loaded with stagnant water.
21
posted on
06/09/2009 5:36:35 PM PDT
by
MissouriConservative
(Let the purging of the RINOs begin in 2010. - MissouriConservative)
To: Texas Eagle
Whew. That was close. And to think we almost elected this guy President. I would do anything to be whining about drilling in anwar and illegal aliens compared to what we are facing now.
To: rabscuttle385
That’s Ok we don’t need to drill for oil. I’m sure there are lots and lots of nice people in the world who will sell us oil for a fair price. Donchathink?
To: Texas Eagle
Wouldn’t that make it 20 years?
24
posted on
06/09/2009 5:37:42 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: Paladin2
>>>> Ive heard that it will be 10 yrs before we get any oil anyway. <<<<<<
The distance from the ANWR fields to the existing Alaska Pipeline is about 100 miles.
The 700 mile long Pipeline was built in three years start to finish.
So let’s speculate that the new 100 mile “feeder” can be built and connected in 6 to 12 months, plus permit and planning time (another 6 to 12 months?).
“10 years” seems a bit excessive.
25
posted on
06/09/2009 5:38:24 PM PDT
by
angkor
To: plain talk
I would do anything to be whining about drilling in anwar and illegal aliens compared to what we are facing now. Sheeyit. The RAT Congress would've passed everything under McCain that they've passed under Ubama. You think McCain woulda had the balls to veto anything the RAT Congress sent to his desk?
I don't.
The only difference between McCain and Ubama is a birth certificate.
26
posted on
06/09/2009 5:38:53 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: Paladin2
Wouldnt that make it 20 years?Yes. And 10 years from now when they say it won't produce oil for at least 109 years, that will make it 30 years.
Or would that make it 40 years?
27
posted on
06/09/2009 5:39:54 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: angkor
Just kidding. The way things are going, my grandkids won’t see any oil from there for at least 50 yr.
28
posted on
06/09/2009 5:40:11 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: rabscuttle385
McCain, kiss my ass, and tell your daughter to STFU while you at it stop pretending to be a conservative and STFU as well.
Anyway, I voted for Sarah Palin NOT you McLame.
29
posted on
06/09/2009 5:40:43 PM PDT
by
VastRWCon
(www.auctionbump.com)
To: Chgogal
Ditto that! McCain and all the others are TOTALLY unreasonable. While we work on alternatives, petroleum is IT. Besides gas, look at all the things made from it. To NOT drill our own resources will send our finances to others; it will NOT save the planet; and when alternatives come in, we will be sitting on billions that could have been used to save our economy and supply good paying jobs.
If we ever have another 911, and I pray we don't, let it hit the capital and jar some of these people loose from their set ways.
vaudine
30
posted on
06/09/2009 5:42:46 PM PDT
by
vaudine
To: Texas Eagle
No, what we got is tenfold worse.
31
posted on
06/09/2009 5:43:58 PM PDT
by
SoldierDad
(Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier presently instructing at Ft. Benning.)
To: Chgogal
McCain is a scooter-seeker and an onery one to boot!
32
posted on
06/09/2009 5:46:08 PM PDT
by
pointsal
To: SoldierDad
No, what we got is tenfold worse.Yeah. Right.
Will the blinders never come off?
33
posted on
06/09/2009 5:46:44 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: Chgogal
McCain, Powell, Gingrich, and the rest are only going to cost us election after election with this BS.
There are over 300 million people living in this Nation, and we need fuel to continue our progress.
Anything less than enhanced oil exploration and nuclear power plants is going to result in a totally inefficient and unacceptable lack of resources.
Solar power and wind mills ain't gonna cut it for over 300 million people.
34
posted on
06/09/2009 5:49:24 PM PDT
by
Prole
(Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
To: pointsal
McCain belongs in a retirement home, not in a position of responsibility where he is affecting our future with his total lack of realistic goals.
35
posted on
06/09/2009 5:51:22 PM PDT
by
Prole
(Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
To: rabscuttle385
McQueeg is a bit confused here What he deems Maverick is in reality Traitor-ism to the Americans.
36
posted on
06/09/2009 5:56:23 PM PDT
by
Cheetahcat
(Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
To: Prole
"McCain, Powell, Gingrich, and the rest are only going to cost us election after election with this BS."Agree completely. McCain and Powell are beyond salvaging. What little hope I had for Newt has been drained away with his latest statement on "inclusiveness". All three are utter losers.
37
posted on
06/09/2009 5:57:51 PM PDT
by
Czar
((Still Fed Up to the Teeth with Washington))
To: Sarah Barracuda
McCain is going to stick around if he can; he plans to turn his senate seat over to his daughter when she comes of age.
38
posted on
06/09/2009 5:57:57 PM PDT
by
Melchior
To: Czar
Precisely, and don't forget that Gingrich also took a shot at Rush recently.
He went on a rant on MSLSD, and referred to Rush as "irrational" because Rush wants Obama's push for America's destruction to FAIL.
Gingrich is a sure loser in any future election because Conservatives know full well that he will say anything to anyone so long as he stays popular.
He is washed up, and needs to go away.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Glk98T4eyq4
39
posted on
06/09/2009 6:01:20 PM PDT
by
Prole
(Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
To: rabscuttle385
Someone in the Republican party should take a picture of a S. Cal wind farm with hundreds of turbines ruining the view of a valley near Palm Springs - then they should ask, "If windmills can cover the landscape why not a few quiet gas or oil wells?" If a they took a picture of a soalr farm in the deseart they could ask, "Why are these soalr panels OK but an oil well that takes of 10% is not OK?"
The problem is that Republican leaders are out of touch with working people, so they can't figure out the correct message.
40
posted on
06/09/2009 6:01:21 PM PDT
by
q_an_a
To: Prole
You are 100% correct. Solar and wind mills are interruptible sources of energy. You need redundant sources to meet peak day requirements. By definition, the âenvironmentalâ sources are the more costly to the ratepayer.
41
posted on
06/09/2009 6:03:44 PM PDT
by
Chgogal
(American Mugabe, get your arse out of my bank and get your arse out of my car!)
To: Texas Eagle
Not that I would want McCain as President, but you think that Obama is better? You prefer a supporter of Islam?
42
posted on
06/09/2009 6:04:04 PM PDT
by
SoldierDad
(Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier presently instructing at Ft. Benning.)
To: SoldierDad
Not that I would want McCain as President, but you think that Obama is better?No. I think they're both sides of the same coin.
You prefer a supporter of Islam?No. You think McCain would speak out against Islam? Mr. "C-c-can't we all j-j-jest get along" himself?
I'm not wasting one of the limited and valuable seconds of my life defending a sack of crap like McCain.
43
posted on
06/09/2009 6:07:46 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: Texas Eagle
I’m not defending him either - I’m only pointing out just how much worse the winner of that very bad election is.
44
posted on
06/09/2009 6:09:17 PM PDT
by
SoldierDad
(Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier presently instructing at Ft. Benning.)
To: SoldierDad
You prefer a supporter of Islam? And another thing: By not supporting the drilling of oil in Alaska, McCain is, in effect, supporting Islam in the sense that Islamic states like Saudi Arabia, Iran, United Arab Emirates, etc., hold us over the proverbial barrel.
Yeah, yeah. I know we get most of our oil from Canadia and Mehico and all that jazz but, still, my point is McCain would do nothing appreciably different than Ubama has done.
That's right. And I include releasing detainees onto American soil and releasing photos of intelligence gathering tactics and grandstanding on waterboarding, etc.
45
posted on
06/09/2009 6:12:51 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: Chgogal
Yup.
Like we have discussed, McCain, Powell, Gingrich and the rest of the RINOs are only going to continue to cost us our future.
They will all continue to lose, and lose badly. This is because in 2012, the RINOs won't have the money or popular support to even face Obama, let alone defeat him.
46
posted on
06/09/2009 6:13:56 PM PDT
by
Prole
(Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
To: SoldierDad; Texas Eagle; Bokababe; kronos77; calcowgirl; TigersEye; TADSLOS; cripplecreek
ou prefer a supporter of Islam?
As I recall, McCain was an avid supporter of the KLA [1, 2, 3]a loose affiliate of al Qaeda [4]during the Kosovo intervention under Clinton. In fact, he was even endorsed by a group of pro-"greater" Albania lobbyists with links to the KLA, al-Qaeda, and drug trafficking networks [5].
Both of them supported Islamofascists, as far as I am concerned.
47
posted on
06/09/2009 6:14:14 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" Patrick Henry)
To: SoldierDad
Im not defending him either - Im only pointing out just how much worse the winner of that very bad election is. I apologize. I didn't mean to accuse you of defending McCain. I guess I'm still pissed off at the way he ran his campaign and hung Gov. Palin out to dry then and now.
I concede that McCain would not be quite as bad as Ubama but I contend that he would not have been all that much better.
48
posted on
06/09/2009 6:15:14 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
To: SoldierDad; TigersEye
Im not defending him either - Im only pointing out just how much worse the winner of that very bad election is.Worse?
(snorts)
What can be worse than opposing domestic drilling (de facto funding of Islamic terrorists via Islamic oil-exporting states) and arming al-Qaeda terrorists (KLA), as well as supporting the use of the United States armed forces in support of al-Qaeda terrorists?
49
posted on
06/09/2009 6:16:16 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" Patrick Henry)
To: Texas Eagle
50
posted on
06/09/2009 6:16:28 PM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" Patrick Henry)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson