Posted on 06/09/2009 12:30:53 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) - A Muslim convert charged in the killing of a soldier at a recruiting center in Arkansas says he didn't consider it murder because U.S. military action in the Middle East made the killing justified.
Abdulhakim Muhammad told The Associated Press Tuesday in Little Rock that he confessed to police that he killed Pvt. William Long outside an Army-Navy recruiting center.
But he said murder exists only "without a justified reason."
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
A convert to the religion of peace.
Defended by the DOJ and ACLU against Americans.
I guess he didn’t get the memo from ‘O’.
Public hanging would be a suitable sentence for this POC.
Of course he’d say that.
Guess where that puts him in regards to capital punishment.
Well, at least the guy knows the democrat talking points.
Yeah try that defense in an Arkansas courtroom and see where it gets you.
Military tribunals have different rules, and guilty parties get hanged.
Also, if the jihadis declared open warfare, shouldn't the recruiters start arming themselves?
Somehow,, I’ve got a feeling at his trial he’ll be shackled and his mouth taped shut....
with logic like that, he can count on our islamic messiah to grant him a presidential pardon and give him a job with the pentagon.
Yeah, you just keep thinking that way baby when you're getting ready to take a little nap!
[repost]
It seems to me that there are two spheres of activity here. In one, the murderer gunned down a soldier and will face the legal consequences.
However, this neglects the other sphere of activity.
The fanatic was acting in the name of his religion, in a religious act, and indifferent to the legal consequences. The law truly means nothing to him.
For this reason, the fanatic *also* needs to face religious consequences as well as legal consequences. This is a difficult concept for secular westerners to understand, but an important one.
He must be stripped of his Muslim sanctimony.
There are many things a Muslim can do, or have done to them, that strips them of their righteousness by *their* rules. That denies them forever their religious goals. For many (if not all Muslims), this involves being contaminated with pork or pork products.
So his sentence, as it were, will be to somehow splash him, assault him, with pork grease. In his eyes, and the eyes of his fellow Muslims, this matters far more than even his being executed. It is an irrevocable punishment, and *importantly* has an extremely strong deterrent effect against other Muslims who contemplate other such murderous crimes.
For this reason, to save lives, it is *essential* that he be splashed with pork fat.
Only at first does this sound ludicrous. But it is deadly serious. US General “Blackjack” Pershing ended a protracted and vicious war by performing a similar act. After trying for years to conduct war in the first sphere of action, the bloody war still raged. But with a single act in the second sphere, his Muslim enemy immediately stopped hostilities.
In short, he not only needs to be splashed with pork fat, but pictures of that attack need to be widely disseminated, with the message:
“Those who murder for jihad are covered in pork fat.”
The impact of this single act will be extraordinary. The Muslim world will scream in horror that this murderer will have forfeited his soul, not that he has murdered an innocent. But it will be deeply terrifying to them. This will be obvious by their cries and protests, threats and demands.
But more than anything else, it will make the Muslim world fearful. They will fear attacking innocents, for fear that they will meet the same fate.
Pork fat could end much of this war.
Cut his head off.
....look for more black converts to launch attacks on whites in years to come....they are Islam’s 5th column of the future.
Bah! By that “reasoning”, anybody who suspected his wife of cheating would be justified...... Oh, wait. They do that.
If that's true, then the 60,000 abortions and the killing of George Tiller was likewise justified? /sarc
I think we need a federal law that makes conviction of an armed assault upon a member of our armed forces require mandatory life without parole or the death sentence and to require all appeals to be filed within 14 days and heard within 21. That means within 70 days of conviction the appeals process would be over...and on the 71st day, the scumbag can be given a shot to guarantee he would never catch the flu.
Public hanging would be a suitable sentence for this POC.”
Give me a few shots at him with my 12 gauge...I want to wound him multiple times, and then let him lay there and watch his guts fall out on the sand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.