Playboy has already died. They had to combine two monthly issues into 1 this month because they ran out of money.
Print magazines are dead in general, much less those that compete against free internet porn.
The video has been removed. Do we have a printed excerpt?
That’s “ripping playboy apart”?
I don’t know what it’s going to take, but it’s going to take a hell of a lot more than that to counter the kind of hate playboy displayed towards these women.
Vile? That’s lame.
A shout-out for war is more like it.
Compared to the rips other conservative women are able to unleash, this just seems like a indignant whiffle bat slap.
No luck. It’s removed period!
For anyone who saw the original article, this was so far beyond vile it was ghastly. I’m not easily offended, but this wasn’t so much a matter of being offensive in the prurient sense; it was unquestionably hate-speech of the most pubescent kind and to think it got by an editor even for a minute is inexcusable. To attempt to backpedal and cover it up with a lame distractive excuse is like someone coming over to your house, taking a big fat dump on your floor, and saying “excuse me”. Unbelievably poor taste and judgement on Playboy’s part.
OK...but Megyn Kelly is hot.
Saw some of the original Playboy piece the other day on a thread here ... what’s particularly odd abut the whole thing is that Playboy mag is now run by a woman, Hefner’s daughter Christie.
“hate f@##”?
How about Nazi rape terrorism?
This is a concept so far beyond vile, it should be prosecutable as assault.
Good for Megyn. This article is reprehensible in the way it objectifies and diminishes women and implicitly calls for violence.
I will give them credit, though. For the most part, they picked some attractive women. They’re proving that our women are more attractive than theirs.
I’m sure Ann Coulter is upset that she wasn’t included.
And it was entirely hypocritical of Playboy to remove the article. It is preserved on the web, however, at http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2009/06/02/the-playboy-article-nsfw/ so Palyboy can’t hide the shameful thing they did.
Playboy was on my list 25 years ago as a subscriber. Promoting rape of conservative women will be the death knell.
This is an ugly in-road into our society and our real men must do more than speak up- they gotta start kicking some ass.
There are some people among us who need a good fist in the mouth, like that smarmy little fag who berated Miss California over her 'opinion' on gay marriage. Was it about 'gay marriage'?, hell no. It was about a woman this little co*ksucker could never compete with when it comes to attracting a 'man'. She threatened his homo appeal in ways he'll never understand.
To let these events rise to national attention without an adequate response is detrimental. The only way this story works is when Perez Hilton is in a dentist's office trying to get his teeth fixed. He had it coming, believe me.
It's a pretty simple formula: you attack my women, I attack you back. As a society we need to send a message.
"Leave our girls alone."
What’s truly sad is that I know a lot of liberals who have made comments to me in that same vein. Things like “I’d like to rape Ann Coulter”, just to give one example.
W. Cleon Skousen, damn BYU alum that he was, had it right when he said that Communists will do and say just about anything toward their political enemies.
I agree with Megyn that Playboy certainly didn’t display respect for women by allowing these lousy comments on their site, but let’s be clear here.
Playboy has never respected women for anything other than their ability to sell magazines by exposing their private parts to the public on it’s pages.
Many lovely women have been sold on the idea that shaving and exposing their privates, was the way to popularity and success.
Frankly, I would have rather seen them dress up in classy clothes and tell me more about themselves, than make up stories that will only lead other women to go down the same rabbit hole.
Hugh, you should be ashamed of yourself.
Ladies, so should you. And guys, those of you who support this publication, so should you.
Playboy really crossed the line with this. There is no rational excuse for naming specific women to be raped.
If you haven't read it, here's a link to the playboy.com piece by Guy Cimbalo. There is no nudity, but I guarantee that any conservative will find this extremely offensive:
http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2009/06/02/the-playboy-article-nsfw/
I expect that redstate.com will be asked to remove the piece soon, since it is probably copyrighted. If you want to show others how low the left will go, save your own copy.
Has Obama released a statement on this? Any word that US Marshalls are protecting these declared targets of domestic terror?
Okay... I went to the Red State site and read the Playboy thing. ...That’s it? That’s all?
It’s 8th grade boy’s gym class stuff, but with no discernible point to it.
Whatever.
So, a leftist blogger, writing on Playboy's web site, decided which conservative women "needed" to be raped, and which ones he wanted to rape himself. So, where are the "womyns" and civil rights groups, decrying the advocacy of rape?
Mark
The last Playboy I bought was in 1971. I had an epiphany and thought there were better things with which to spend my money.
Megyn vs. the Pornocracy.
They don't stand a chance.
That line about how in a "battle of wits" the opponents are "unarmed" comes to mind.
Not even for the articles.
hmmmm I wonder how the white house woudl react if Michelle Obama was given the same treatment and had those kinds of hate words issued towards her? The dems woudl be insane with fury and out of hteir mind with contempt- but by golly- attack conservatives, and hte media simply ignores it?
Ticking off Megyn Kelly is ALWAYS a very very very bad idea.
This is just another example of how liberals are total phonies. The perport themselves to advocate strong women when in fact they only support pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage fringe extreme leftist women. We saw this last year when feminazi’s said nothing as every name in the book was thrown in Sarah Palin’s direction. What the left does not realize is that when this happens and they say nothing they are lowering the bar for civil discourse. When libs say nothing and then when these same tactics are used against them they then want to cry foul. Their hypocricy is obvious.
I checked out DummyUnderground to see if the inmates had a thread going about this controversy. If they had one, I couldn’t find it, and I checked a lot of gen discussion threads. Oh, there were quite a few threads where the Dummies declared their hatred for vile, disgusting conservatives in general, but no threads about the hate/f... blog. Strange, huh? (smirk)
Guy come on out and face your adoring public, you p***k!