That’s ‘dipolomaticspeak’ for , “Her opinion sucks. For gawd’s sake, don’t frikkin’ appoint her.”
A Dismiss black panther vote intimidation.
B Appoint a racist as SCOTUS nominee.
C Use ACORN to hire thousands of employees to do the census, but exclude
1) ‘hate’ groups;
2) LEOs; and
3) anti-immigrant groups.
Three points makes a straight line in any plane.
Sorry Liz, since you’re not an official office holder of the republican party, you must SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP. John Cornyn says so.
Thank you, Liz.
I know I’m going to be paying attention to who fights this nomination and who rolls over for the sake of....anything but the best interests of this country.
If this nomination isn’t fought, it’s the beginning of the end. We’ll see an endless string of “you can’t touch me” nominees.
One point that nobody has pointed out is that Sotomayor is correct, and that essentially the only real justice will come from a judge of one’s own ethnic group, why would any white male feel like they would get justice from a Justice Sotomayor when she obviously doesn’t share their experience and clearly thinks them inferior.
Wow! I didn't realize she had five kids!
OK, Cheney has a daughter who is a lesbian? Is this that one or am I confused here?
In yet another, Schieffer – Cheney interview, the mother of five said, “if you switched around the designations in the quote, you know somebody's career would over.”
The Sotomayor quote in question came from a 2001 speech where the court nominee said, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white man who hasn’t lived that life.”
If the designations were indeed switched, the quote would read:
“I would hope that a wise white man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Latina woman who hasn’t lived that life."
Besides So-So and the half man who nominated her, who says this LaLaLatina racist is wise?