Skip to comments.
N. Korean nuclear blast probably less powerful than hoped for: Yale scholar
Yonhap News ^
| 05/28/09
| Sam Kim
Posted on 05/28/2009 6:44:23 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster
Wow - what auditorium is that? How many does it hold, and is it air conditioned??
I still believe that these “tests” are for military purposes first (see the small bomb theory), and advertising second to potential buying who can send over cash to keep the regime afloat.
21
posted on
05/28/2009 7:08:48 AM PDT
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Exactly. That’s why this geologist is dead wrong in thinking they are building primitive fat boy type nukes.
They would be concentrating their efforts on making modern miniaturized nukes similar to ours, and NOT wasting their limited plutonium supply. A 4KT blast could mean they had a very successful test, after following the directions at ‘howstuffworks.com’ LoL!
To: TigerLikesRooster
Their goal isnt a miniature deliverable. They just need something that goes “boom” down in a hole. That achieves Kim’s goal of squeezing money out of the USA. We got a weak naive president in January. He figured out how to play his guy in a nanosecond.
The proper way to measure the yield of a North Korean is not in Kilotons,,,it’s more properly measured in billion’s of dollars bluffed out of the USA!!
23
posted on
05/28/2009 7:15:00 AM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
For all we know, they were testing a nuclear trigger. Our nukes have triggers that put out as much power as the nagasaki bomb.
To: Nathan Zachary
Wouldn't that be embarrassing if our aging nuke failed to go off... And supplied them with a design and a bucket of fissile material...
25
posted on
05/28/2009 7:17:05 AM PDT
by
Onelifetogive
(Check out Puppy News at www.buyingapuppy.com)
To: Nathan Zachary
Of course, they will have a better detonator at the next time. Which means using the same amount of plutonium but creating a bigger yield.
26
posted on
05/28/2009 7:18:15 AM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
To: TigerLikesRooster
the homogeniety always astounds me.
27
posted on
05/28/2009 7:19:27 AM PDT
by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
To: DesertRhino
I can’t believe that. They want regional power as well, power over Japan, a deterrence to China and Russia, major influence over S.korea, and something salable, which they THEN can blackmail billions from the USA with, much like Pakistan does.
To: TigerLikesRooster
The Dear Leader's Peoples' Committee for Cultural and Racial Diversity of the North in Praising the Great Works of Communism holds its weekly meeting -- NY Times
To: pabianice
Not a lot of “empathy” in NoKo.
30
posted on
05/28/2009 7:25:20 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Yep. They
have to know that using plutonium to force other tamper materials to fission rather than just using plutonium as the fissile material is the way to go.
Surely people don't think their scientists are cave men.
To: pabianice
To: TigerLikesRooster
The money quote of the year:
"Make no mistake -- an inefficient nuclear weapon is nothing to dismiss." Gee, ya think?
33
posted on
05/28/2009 7:36:22 AM PDT
by
Oatka
("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
To: MrB
correct; while we are poking fun about their “failure” on rockets and the size of the nuc’s it only takes a very small one to kill thousands...
To: martinidon
The psychological effect is HUGE as well.
Just “North Korea Nukes Seoul”, no matter what the yield, is enough to cause huge disruptions worldwide.
35
posted on
05/28/2009 7:40:40 AM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, Bowman later)
To: Nathan Zachary
And, for all we know, Obama will get his high powered foreign policy team together (aka Hillary) and start tough negotiations with North Korea. But first, they’ll need to offer them something as a sign of good faith...something like our nuclear trigger technology...yeah, that’ll get North Korea to come back to the bargaining table...
36
posted on
05/28/2009 7:46:03 AM PDT
by
Paco
To: Sam's Army
They also told us that “nuclear shelters” wouldn’t work. Not against a volly of bombs by the major nuclear powers but ultimately there were people in Japan who were partially burned by where they were exposed.
Depends on the yield of the bomb.
If you are at ground zero you don’t have much hope but beyond that...
37
posted on
05/28/2009 7:49:20 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Justice is blind. Sonia Sotomayor is not even qualified to sit on an IMPARTIAL jury.)
To: Paco
When Barack Obama was in college he made a statement about "when we were kids, practicing nuclear drills in school" (paraphrased) yet he grew up in Indonesia, not the US school system. And the duck and cover drills of old were over by the 1970s when he returned to the States (Hawaii).
I went through tornado drills living on the Gulf Coast. Maybe he was just confused. Or lying again.
38
posted on
05/28/2009 7:51:35 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Justice is blind. Sonia Sotomayor is not even qualified to sit on an IMPARTIAL jury.)
To: pabianice
Hey, isn't that Buddy Hackett, second row on the aisle?
To: martinidon
What’s the carbon footprint?
Where is the no nukes crowd?
How many animals and weeds were killed?
40
posted on
05/28/2009 7:52:37 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Justice is blind. Sonia Sotomayor is not even qualified to sit on an IMPARTIAL jury.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson