Skip to comments.
Libertarians blast Sotomayor pick
The Libertarian Party ^
| 5/26/09
| The Libertarian Party
Posted on 05/26/2009 9:40:55 AM PDT by VirginiaConstitutionalist
Libertarians blast Sotomayor pick
Obama Court nominee ruled government should discriminate based on race
WASHINGTON -- Americas third largest party Tuesday criticized President Barack Obamas nomination of federal appeals court judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, citing past rulings that public employers should discriminate in hiring based on race.
While Judge Sotomayor deserves a fair and impartial hearing, Supreme Court justices should be nominated for their thorough knowledge of and adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law, said William Redpath, Libertarian National Committee Chairman.
By nominating Sonia Sotomayor, Barack Obama has made it clear he prefers an activist for his personal causes over a rational interpreter of law, said Redpath.
According to Cato Institute Vice President for Legal Affairs Roger Pilon, Sotomayor is the most radical of all the frequently mentioned candidates before him.
Sotomayor is best known for the Ricci v. DeStafano case, in which the New Haven, Conn. fire department decided it didnt like the results of an officers promotion exam in which whites and Hispanic firefighters outperformed black firefighters. The city threw out the results of the exam, denying several firefighters promotions solely because of their race. The firefighters sued the city, claiming racial discrimination under Title VVI of the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Cato Institute, Reason Foundation and the Individual Rights Foundations filed briefs on behalf of the firefighters, citing the absurdity of allowing public employers to throw out the results of valid, race-neutral exams that produce racial disparity because the racial disparity produced wasnt politically correct. The firefighters and the libertarian foundations filing briefs argued that public employment practices should be color-blind.
Sotomayor disagreed, ruling the city has a right to discriminate against white and Hispanic public employees to construct a politically correct racial mix in hiring, even if it goes against the results of a racially-neutral competency exam.
The case is now before the Supreme Court. Sotomayor has had her rulings thrown out by the court a troubling four times. In three of those cases, the Court ruled Sotomayor had incorrectly interpreted the law.
It is troubling that Obama, who won the highest elected office in the world without racial preferences, would nominate someone who openly admits the government should racially discriminate against its own citizens to serve the needs of political correctness, said Redpath.
Libertarians believe that, while the First Amendments guarantee of freedom of association allows private parties to hire whomever they please, government has no right to discriminate. Public employers should treat all citizens of all colors, races and ethnicities with equal respect and value and Sotomayors radical rulings are a jarring departure from that principle.
For more information on this issue, or to arrange an interview with the Libertarian Party, please call Director of Communications Donny Ferguson at 703-200-3669 or 202-333-0008, x. 225, or email Donny.Ferguson@lp.org.
The Libertarian Party is America's third-largest political party, founded in 1971 as an alternative to the two main political parties. You can find more information on the Libertarian Party by visiting http://www.LP.org. The Libertarian Party proudly stands for smaller government, lower taxes and more freedom.
# # #
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: libertarian; lp; lping; scotus; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-76 next last
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
WAKE UP AMERICA!.....WE ARE IN DEEP SHIT! THIS WOMAN IS AS RADICAL AS THEY COME!
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
Sonia Sotomayor—HolyO’s Harriet Miers!! LOL!
I figure this will last until Friday, then she’ll ‘voluntarily’ withdraw her name from consideration due to ‘family obligations’—thus handing HolyO his first defeat in nominating a SCOTUS justice, LOL!!
Total meltdown by all parties involved in 3...2...1...
3
posted on
05/26/2009 9:43:21 AM PDT
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --"God help us all, and God help America!!" --my new mantra for the next 4 years)
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
She is on tape; she is toast.
4
posted on
05/26/2009 9:43:23 AM PDT
by
ex91B10
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
Conservatives better be doing the same damn thing. This B*tch is a dangerous radical nutcase.
5
posted on
05/26/2009 9:44:32 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: ex91B10
Don’t you know by now obama can do whatever he wants?
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
Libertarians believe that, while the First Amendments guarantee of freedom of association allows private parties to hire whomever they please, government has no right to discriminate." How come?
7
posted on
05/26/2009 9:45:49 AM PDT
by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
To: ex91B10
8
posted on
05/26/2009 9:45:57 AM PDT
by
Bodhi1
(Homeschools for a reason.)
To: pillut48
I figure this will last until Friday, then shell voluntarily withdraw her name from consideration due to family obligations...'Health concerns' would be more likely - as a longterm diabetic, that's a real issue.
9
posted on
05/26/2009 9:46:18 AM PDT
by
nina0113
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
While Judge Sotomayor deserves a fair and impartial hearing, Supreme Court justices should be nominated for their thorough knowledge of and adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law, The liberals line of crap is that the Constitution is a fluid document, thus there is really nothing to adhere to. It says whatever you think it should.
10
posted on
05/26/2009 9:46:19 AM PDT
by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: AngelesCrestHighway
KAGAN is worse. Karlan and Sullivan are worse still.
This isn't nearly as bad as we could have got.
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
She issued the order allowing the Wall Street Journal to publish Vince Foster’s suicide note. She also has diabetes, so she won’t outlive Ginsburg.
12
posted on
05/26/2009 9:49:28 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: ex91B10
She is on tape; she is toast. So if what you say is accurate , that is the proof they needed to prove she is a lesbian . Looks like they win this round guys .
13
posted on
05/26/2009 9:50:13 AM PDT
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know F/8 Cav)
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
OT, but both the Libertarian Party and the Constitution Party claim to be the third largest political party in the U.S. Who is telling the truth, and what exactly are they going by to get to their claim of being the third largest political party in the U.S.?
14
posted on
05/26/2009 9:51:49 AM PDT
by
johnthebaptistmoore
(Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
To: ex91B10
There are at least 51 members of the senate who agree with her. I see an obligatory couple days of huffing and puffing by the so-called “conservative Republicans” in the senate and, then, they will head for the tall grass and capitulate as Obama expects them to do.
15
posted on
05/26/2009 9:51:59 AM PDT
by
Russ
(Repeal the 17th amendment)
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
Supreme Court justices should be nominated for their thorough knowledge of and adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law,Imagine that......nominating someone that's actually qualified.
16
posted on
05/26/2009 9:52:46 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: AngelesCrestHighway
I predict she will destroy herself on her own.
17
posted on
05/26/2009 9:52:54 AM PDT
by
freebird5850
(O-Bomba is not the Messia. Jesus was a carpenter and could build a cabinet!)
To: Southack
Better an “empty skirt” like this than a leading liberal intellectual force that might be able to persuade Kennedy to join the dark side of the force.
18
posted on
05/26/2009 9:55:53 AM PDT
by
Chet 99
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
Glenn Beck will have a field day with this one!
19
posted on
05/26/2009 9:57:10 AM PDT
by
Palladin
(Obama hates unborn babies.)
To: freedomwarrior998
Kagan or Wood are next...remember another retirement is just around the corner.
20
posted on
05/26/2009 9:57:25 AM PDT
by
roses of sharon
(NOTRE DAMIAN: ABORTION, YES WE CAN!)
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
She and Obama seem to agree with a lot of liberatian positions though, so it is a mixed bag for the Libertarians.
Libertarian Party Platform:
Throw open the borders completely; only a rare individual (terrorist, disease carrier etc.) can be kept from freedom of movement through political borders.
Homosexuals; total freedom in the military, gay marriage, adoption, child custody and everything else.
Abortion; zero restrictions or impediments.
Pornography; no restraint, no restrictions.
Drugs; Meth, Heroin, Crack, anything new that science can come up with, zero restrictions.
Advertising drugs, prostitution, pornography; zero restrictions.
Military Strength; minimal capabilities.
21
posted on
05/26/2009 9:57:47 AM PDT
by
ansel12
(Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
It is troubling that Obama, who won the highest elected office in the world without racial preferences, would nominate someone who openly admits the government should racially discriminate against its own citizens to serve the needs of political correctness, said Redpath. I thought Obama won precisely BECAUSE he is black....not despite being black.
22
posted on
05/26/2009 10:01:25 AM PDT
by
Aria
( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
To: AngelesCrestHighway
"...Supreme Court justices should be nominated for their thorough knowledge of and adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law, WOW...what a concept! Too bad you don't hear many republicans state this fact (other than Rep. Ron Paul, I guess).
23
posted on
05/26/2009 10:03:35 AM PDT
by
ChrisInAR
(The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
To: Mojave
Government is bound to “Title VVI of the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Libertarians believe that private people shouldn’t be bound to these since they must pay the penalty for whomever they hire. If I choose to not serve women in my restaurant, I’ll lose business and suffer economic consequences for that decision. If I choose to not hire any black people on my basketball team, generally the team I make would most likely suffer in terms of winning due to that decision. Governments typically don’t face the same market forces; they can discriminate as they please unless bound by law.
24
posted on
05/26/2009 10:06:30 AM PDT
by
In veno, veritas
(Please identify my Ad Hominem attacks. I should be debating ideas.)
To: freedomwarrior998
I agree. The reports I have seen show her NOT to be the favorite of the left. Whoever gets the appointment its still going to be a liberal and from what I have seen she appears to be the least damaging. Homing in on this one PC case does not tell the entire story.She upheld the Bush administrations right to prohibit pro-abortion information to foreign locations by ruling against a pro-abortion group that challenged administration policy. Further she stated the following with respect to the constitution:
At her Senate confirmation hearing more than a decade ago, she said, “I don't believe we should bend the Constitution under any circumstance. It says what it says. We should do honor to it.”
To: johnthebaptistmoore
I would say that the Libertarians are the larger of the 2.
26
posted on
05/26/2009 10:07:40 AM PDT
by
ChrisInAR
(The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
To: Chet 99
"Better an empty skirt like this than a leading liberal intellectual force that might be able to persuade Kennedy to join the dark side of the force." I agree. We could've gotten much worse. This is not the battle to risk everything for.
27
posted on
05/26/2009 10:09:15 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist; Clintonfatigued; Impy; Clemenza; AuH2ORepublican; BlackElk; ...
This might all be a set-up. The False Messiah knows this lady is a moron and a disgrace to the bench and can be (with enough opposition) defeated, he can then use her defeat to bludgeon Republicans with being both anti-Hispanic and anti-female, and then he’ll put up his true choice for the bench who will be even more dangerous.
28
posted on
05/26/2009 10:09:54 AM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: ansel12
Very true. How very little is known of the real positions of the Libertarian Party.
To: Russ
"There are at least 51 members of the senate who agree with her. I see an obligatory couple days of huffing and puffing by the so-called conservative Republicans in the senate and, then, they will head for the tall grass and capitulate as Obama expects them to do." My good Senator Jeff Sessions, the most conservative in the land, who fought the good fight against Amnesty, already telegraphed the above to you when he said that he wouldn't vote against a candidate based solely on her being a lesbian.
Why?
Because Sotomayor is not as liberal as 0bama's other potential choices.
Defeat her in the Senate and 0bama will stick us with someone much worse.
30
posted on
05/26/2009 10:16:07 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
Libertarians blast Sotomayor pick.
Should read:
Libertarians tippy-toe out of the middle of the road to blast Sotomayor pick, then tippy-toe back.
31
posted on
05/26/2009 10:19:40 AM PDT
by
alarm rider
(Any country that tells you what light bulb to use is not a free country.)
To: In veno, veritas
Government is bound to Title VVI of the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.I see. The Libertarian party supports the Civil Rights Act.
So how about those parts of it that limit individual rights to discriminate?
32
posted on
05/26/2009 10:22:14 AM PDT
by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
While Judge Sotomayor deserves a fair and impartial hearing, Supreme Court justices should be nominated for their thorough knowledge of and adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law, said William Redpath, Libertarian National Committee Chairman. As the National Committee Chairman of America's Independent Party, the third largest party in America based on voter registration, I concur heartily in this statement from my Libertarian counterpart.
33
posted on
05/26/2009 10:25:11 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The box is broke. You don't have any choice now but to think outside of it.)
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; ...
34
posted on
05/26/2009 10:37:14 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Aria
They just say he is black, He is half white, 44% ARAB and 6% black.
35
posted on
05/26/2009 10:42:08 AM PDT
by
Danae
(Amerikan Unity My Ass)
To: Southack
“She also has diabetes, so she wont outlive Ginsburg.”
My MIL has diabetes; she is 83.
My grandmother had diabetes; she lived to 95.
To: johnthebaptistmoore
>>
OT, but both the Libertarian Party and the Constitution Party claim to be the third largest political party in the U.S. Who is telling the truth, and what exactly are they going by to get to their claim of being the third largest political party in the U.S.? <<
If you go by number of candidates on the ballot every election, the Libertarian Party is the third largest political party in the U.S. If you go by number of registered party members, the Constitution Party is the third largest party in the U.S. If you go by total number of votes received every election, the Green Party is the third largest political party in the U.S. ...
37
posted on
05/26/2009 11:09:46 AM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
To: ex91B10
Oh PLEASE! She will be in for sure!! She’s a DEMOCRAT WOMEN who looks like Hugo Chavez!
38
posted on
05/26/2009 11:11:07 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Mojave
Did you read the rest of the post? Notice I stated “Government is bound.” The rest of the post was to explain Libertarian logic on why people shouldn't be.
39
posted on
05/26/2009 12:11:59 PM PDT
by
In veno, veritas
(Please identify my Ad Hominem attacks. I should be debating ideas.)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Yes... you could be right ...
But regardless.... we need to oppose anyone who is extreme that he chooses
To: Prophet in the wilderness
We can oppose, but will Republican Senators oppose ?
41
posted on
05/26/2009 12:18:21 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Yes... if they get rid of their jellyfish back disease.
i.e. no back bone.
To: In veno, veritas
Libertarians believe that private people shouldnt be bound to these since they must pay the penalty for whomever they hire. Same for the government.
43
posted on
05/26/2009 12:22:57 PM PDT
by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
44
posted on
05/26/2009 1:07:07 PM PDT
by
timm22
(Think critically)
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
That’s an impressive news release.
45
posted on
05/26/2009 1:11:50 PM PDT
by
Jewbacca
(Yes, I am very hairy and good with small arms.)
To: bamahead
Glad to hear the Libertarian Party weigh in on the side of common sense,
as usual.
"According to Cato Institute Vice President for Legal Affairs Roger Pilon, Sotomayor is 'the most radical of all the frequently mentioned candidates before him.'"
HA!!
Perhaps before him, maybe.
But hardly the most radical of all.
Much like Dr. Who's pockets are infinitely deep with any & everything contained within, zerO has an unlimited supply of flaky clowns.
46
posted on
05/26/2009 1:43:06 PM PDT
by
Landru
(Arghh, Liberals are trapped in my colon like spackle or paste.)
To: Mojave
Continue reading! “Governments typically dont face the same market forces...” And I'll clarify, they are a monopoly; no one can drive them out of business. As seen in current news, it does not matter how much money they lose. There is no driver for them to be efficient.
47
posted on
05/26/2009 1:45:21 PM PDT
by
In veno, veritas
(Please identify my Ad Hominem attacks. I should be debating ideas.)
To: fieldmarshaldj; ExTexasRedhead; Impy; April Lexington
I am somewhat surprised. Sotomayer would be great for a Lifetime Television biography, but not for the Supreme Court. However, she fills out all of the quotas, and she has a thin paper trail on several controversial issues.
48
posted on
05/26/2009 2:24:04 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(The McCain/Palin ticket was like a Kangaroo, stronger on the bottom than at the top)
To: bamahead
The Libertarian Party is right to blast this opinionated, biased judge.
49
posted on
05/26/2009 2:25:28 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(The McCain/Palin ticket was like a Kangaroo, stronger on the bottom than at the top)
To: In veno, veritas
Governments typically dont face the same market forces... Not only is your argument a legal non sequitur, it's untrue that market forces aren't at play in government contracting.
50
posted on
05/26/2009 3:21:18 PM PDT
by
Mojave
(Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson