Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dude, Where's My Torture Prosecutions?
NewsBusters ^ | May 23, 2009 | P.J. Gladnick

Posted on 05/23/2009 7:06:13 AM PDT by PJ-Comix

There has been very little attention paid in the MSM to a meeting on Wednesday between President Obama and various leftwing "human rights" groups except for a brief mention at the CBS News Political Hotsheet. However, according to a detailed report provided by Newsweek's Michael Isikoff on Rachel Maddow's MSNBC show, Obama has revealed that there won't be any prosecutions of Bush administration for so-called torture. Perhaps this was the reason for so little MSM coverage on this meeting. They don't want to disappoint their audience, many of whom are still holding out hope for such prosecutions. However, the leftwing sites on the web are very vocal in their disappointment with Obama's decision including Talking Points Memo:

Yesterday morning President Obama met with representatives of several human rights and civil liberties groups in the White House's cabinet room. Joining him were his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, senior adviser David Axelrod, as well as Attorney General Eric Holder. They sat down with representatives of the ACLU, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Human Rights Watch, among others.

Last night on MSNBC, Rachel Maddow reported that one of the attendees warned the President he was letting George Bush's policies become his own--and that Obama was not pleased by that characterization.

...On at least one issue, though, Obama seems to have made up his mind. Isikoff reports that Obama announced his opposition to torture prosecutions--an unsurprising admission, perhaps, but one that must have disappointed many in attendance. Previously he had said that the question of investigation and prosecuting Bush administration officials was one for Holder to answer. But with Holder sitting right beside him, there's no doubt he's feeling pressure to, as they say, look forward, not backward.


(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; ericholder; michaelisikoff; rachelmaddow
A BIIIIG story that has been ignored by the MSM.
1 posted on 05/23/2009 7:06:13 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paul Heinzman; IMissPresidentReagan; AlexW; Cletus.D.Yokel; ConservativeOrBust; tropical; ...

PING!


2 posted on 05/23/2009 7:07:19 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (E.J. Dionne: "Make the World Safe for Tax Increases")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Because it will lead to Nancy going to jail. LOL


3 posted on 05/23/2009 7:17:58 AM PDT by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

I’m usually not a troll but whenever I’m on a general-news site and people start posting about prosecutions and trials especially for Bush & Cheney I tell them tuck in early and wait for the Tooth Fairy cos it ain’t happening.

Thanks to the prez for dashing their impotent revenge fantasies in person and in no uncertain terms.


4 posted on 05/23/2009 7:20:18 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 70th Division
Because it will lead to Nancy going to jail. LOL

You're right, but I would add:

  1. Turns out by legal definitions, it wasn't torture.
  2. Turns out, they had legal cover okaying the interrogation techniques.
  3. Turns out, lots of democratic "leaders" were briefed in and didn't say anything about it - tacit approval.
I think there is a fair chance nancy is going to lose the speakership, possibly her Congressional seat completely, and she just may go to jail for perjury if she doesn't quit lying.
5 posted on 05/23/2009 7:24:52 AM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar (I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom. You can keep the "change.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
They won't prosecute because part of the Constitution provides that the Commander In Chief “WILL” protect the US from enemies, foreign and domestic. There is NO mention that the President will limit their resources to getting enemy information because Congress may disagree with tactics.
The Rats like to quote the Geneva Convention a lot but if there is contradictory policies within the Geneva Convention and our safety then our safety comes first.

Torture is defined as “intending” to cause permanent physical or mental harm. No Lib can prove anyone intended to cause that harm when no one was harmed.

6 posted on 05/23/2009 7:32:30 AM PDT by tobyhill (Obama's a has-been that never was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeMasterPhilzar

IMO, the primary calculation is that the Dems know that prosecuting people for keeping our country safe is a big loser for the 2010 and 2012 elections. It would also really boost fundraising for conservative and Republican causes.


7 posted on 05/23/2009 7:39:49 AM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Obama and his politburo have not seized sufficient control yet for show trials. Maybe after the Great Purge is complete.


8 posted on 05/23/2009 7:42:57 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Crisis - America Held Hostage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neocon1984
IMO, the primary calculation is that the Dems know that prosecuting people for keeping our country safe is a big loser for the 2010 and 2012 elections.

Ding ding ding ding! We have a winner.

9 posted on 05/23/2009 8:22:45 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler ("Mr. President, I support you but not your mission. I'm showing my patriotism through dissent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

ONE-
You will know that sanity has returned to the public square when the people who are responsible for our safety are worried about the consequences of NOT using enhanced interrogation techniques.

TWO- There were easily 100 people who were plausible Attorney General candidates for Obama to choose from. Obama’s choice of Jamie Goerlock’s boss Eric Holder (arguably one of the 2 or 3 people whose ideological blinders, ignorance and stupidity was most responsible for 9-1) tells you all you need to know about where National Security sits on Obama’s list of priorities.
In a just sane world Eric Holder would not be
making decisions about Guantanamo, he would be in Guantanamo.


10 posted on 05/23/2009 8:43:12 AM PDT by Jonah Johansen ("Coming soon to a neighborhood near you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

and the RATS, take another one in the..............................HA ha!!!

11 posted on 05/23/2009 9:02:19 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - Obama is basically Jim Jones with a teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

It is better for Obama that it doesn’t happen becuse if it did it would take down dems in the senate as well as tell the American people that there truely were very good reasons for why any of this was done and pretty much erase overnight BDS! It is better that Obama can just fan the flames of BDS anytime he needs for whatever purpose he needs.


12 posted on 05/23/2009 10:12:24 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson