Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sacbee scolds voters, then hides after Limbaugh calls them on it.
Sacramento Bee ^ | May 20, 2009 | Andrea Shea King

Posted on 05/20/2009 7:15:16 PM PDT by patriotgal1787

Feeling bruised and abused this morning? Well, you can't say you didn't see it coming. The polls have been saying for weeks that voters were going to do just what they did on Tuesday: Conclusively reject your slate on the ballot, Propositions 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D and 1E.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calinitiatives; editorial; limbaugh; mcclatchey; propvote; sacbee; schwarzenegger; worstexcerptever
The Sacramento Bee got caught with their drawers down. Just 'nother example of the lying media showing us their panties...

This is what appeared this morning before it was pulled -- no doubt because of the furor it caused among readers, and the little fact that el Rushbo mentioned it today on his show as a snarky example of the disdain with which the drive-by's regard the great masses of the unwashed, aka: the Proletariat.

Editorial: You did it! Uh, so what now?

Good morning, California voters. Do you feel better, now that you've gotten that out of your system?

You wanted to show the state's politicians just how mad you are at them. And you did. Boy, did you ever.

Proposition 1A with its taxes and its spending limit? Too much of one and not enough of the other, you said (or was it the other way around), and voted it down. Never mind that the taxes go into efffect anyway. You showed 'em.

Proposition 1B? That was a tougher call.

Proposition 1C? No way. You like the lottery just like it is. And all they were going to do with that extra $5 billion was spend it.

Propositions 1D and 1E? Forget it. You had already voted to put money into preschool and mental health programs. You're not taking it out now.

And 1F? Heck, yeah! Let's not pay our legislators if they can't pass a budget on time. So what if it likely won't have any effect, or that this year they actually passed a budget months earlier than they needed to? That's not the point.

The point is that you're sick and tired of all this political mumbo-jumbo. So you showed those politicians who's in charge. You. You're now officially in charge – of a state that will be something like $25 billion in the hole for the fiscal year beginning July 1.

So, now that you've put those irksome politicians in their place, maybe it's time to think about this: Since you're in charge, exactly what do you intend

...That sounds a lot like work, you say? Sorry, no whining allowed. You asked for this job. Now you've got it, so get on it. Oh, and remember. The entire nation is watching to see how you do now that you're in charge.

Later in the day, the offensive editorial was removed and replaced with a more "reasonable" one that sided with voters. When contacted by show producer Dave Logan to inquire why the switch out, Melanie Sill, Sacbee editor and senior vice president, Editorial Administration Department, claimed the first editorial was a draft of notes, "thoughts" put together on a page, and because they were on deadline, someone mistakenly published the piece. It was never intended to be published. "It was a mistake", she assured him. I bet it was.

Ms. Sill assured Dave that this "mistake" appeared only in the online edition. The Sacbee's paper version went out with the current editorial. We checked the morning edition and she's correct.

Has it ever happened before? "Yes," she admitted. "But nothing like this."

Indeed...

The replacement piece, including this little "addendum" which appeared almost immediately after Dave's conversation with Ms. Sill.

Note to our readers: Many of the comments below refer to an article that was posted in error. That article was a draft prepared for internal discussion among members of The Bee's editorial board. Such discussions are a routine part of our work, and frequently lead to editorials that are considerably different from writers' first drafts.

That's what happened in this case. After discussion, we decided that our initial editorial about the special election should take a different tack. The result was the editorial that now appears on this page. This editorial is the only editorial about the special election that appeared in Wednesday's editions of The Bee.

David Holwerk, Editorial Page Editor, The Sacramento Bee

*****

1 posted on 05/20/2009 7:15:16 PM PDT by patriotgal1787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

The Sacramento Bee is as irrelevant as their McClatchy ugly step-sister here, the Raleigh News & Observer. Ugh!


2 posted on 05/20/2009 7:18:46 PM PDT by TommyDale (Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

LOL what a bunch of clowns. No wonder the media is dying a far too slow and not nearly painful enough death.


3 posted on 05/20/2009 7:20:05 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

A perfect way to keep subscribers: show that your opinions are in lock-step with the mindset of your clientele. So chalk this up as example #427,866 why it’s the liberals who are the out-of-touch extremists.


4 posted on 05/20/2009 7:23:28 PM PDT by alancarp (Obama: treat the unborn with AT LEAST as much respect as you do terrorists!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“LOL what a bunch of clowns.”

Yep and pretty soon they will have their little clown cars to drive around!


5 posted on 05/20/2009 7:24:04 PM PDT by mkcc30 ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
Similar to an editorial that appeared in the Tampa Tribune the day after the Lightning WON the Stanley Cup!


6 posted on 05/20/2009 7:25:39 PM PDT by Bushbacker1 (I'll miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkcc30

I’m glad my F150s are user friendly.

Unfortunately I can see the government pulling them off the road and forcing me to buy from them.


7 posted on 05/20/2009 7:28:33 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

ROTFLMAO


8 posted on 05/20/2009 7:29:33 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It is fun to watch ‘em squirm though.


9 posted on 05/20/2009 7:30:31 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck. (Let them eat arugula!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
You asked for this job. Now you've got it, so get on it.

Conservative: Oh, please LET us....

10 posted on 05/20/2009 7:30:50 PM PDT by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
Wow, jr. high school snark.

These “journalists” are incompetent hacks, simply amazing that they are even hired to write!

11 posted on 05/20/2009 7:34:49 PM PDT by roses of sharon (NOTRE DAMIAN: ABORTION, YES WE CAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

in 5 years the SacBee will NOT EXIST! buh-bye..!


12 posted on 05/20/2009 7:38:31 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

Isn’t “the sac” one of those Democrat big city papers that’s dying?


13 posted on 05/20/2009 7:40:53 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
One of the conclusions I came to after years on The Free Republic was that the media are cheerleaders for taxation and Big Government.

As I've said before, the media could instigate a flaming, bloody national tax revolt in 2 months without even breathing hard.

Instead, it's "Rah, Rah, Sis Boom Bah! More Taxes! Better!" all freaking day long.

14 posted on 05/20/2009 7:41:43 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz's lawn jockey doesn't speak Austrian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

The readers comments on the editorial were so loud and nasty you could hear them in Florida!


15 posted on 05/20/2009 7:43:14 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ("men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
The current editorial is still galling:

"You can blame the voters for reacting with uninformed and misplaced anger. Or you can look in the mirror and admit you had it coming. And you know you did. Over the last couple of decades you and your predecessors in both parties created an environment of cynicism that poisoned Californians' faith in democracy."

Yep, the reason that voters didn't pass this crap is that they're uninformed. Their anger is misplaced--they should be mad at...George Bush, I guess. Voters just didn't have enough "faith in democracy"...so they VOTED.

16 posted on 05/20/2009 7:46:06 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

A new low in cowardice . . . even for Liberals.


17 posted on 05/20/2009 7:53:55 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

I’m sure that Andrea Shea King is the closest thing the Bee has to a fat welfare momma. Affirmative Action/fat welfare momma - same thing.

I’m curious if Andrea Shea King has 5 or 10 drunk boyfriends at her section 8 apartment.


18 posted on 05/20/2009 7:55:09 PM PDT by sergeantdave (obuma is the anti-Lincoln, trying to re-establish slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
All in all, one of the most revealing media events of the year.

Thanks for the original...and its replacement.

Not only is the media liberal. They are also deep down dishonest.

They should be ashamed of themselves. But they don't know shame...

19 posted on 05/20/2009 8:00:58 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
So, now that you've put those irksome politicians in their place.

They are not in their place until they are in the unemployment line.

20 posted on 05/20/2009 8:08:40 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

I can’t believe they changed the title AND the text! LOL. What a bunch of wimps!

Freerepublic caught it before the change.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2254828/posts


21 posted on 05/20/2009 8:09:34 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

In the comments now up commenting on the Stalinist rewriting of their editorial and it’s comments there are now eight links to the original FR thread. I expect that there will soon be a lot of new Central Valley Freepers as a result.


22 posted on 05/20/2009 8:18:36 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ("men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

I noticed one link (I only back one page in the comments).

Readers are obviously (and justifiably) insulted.


23 posted on 05/20/2009 8:21:11 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

ASS*OLE ELITISTS! They will find out they are irrelevant soon enough..


24 posted on 05/20/2009 8:23:54 PM PDT by JSDude1 (DHS, FBI, FEMA, etc have been bad little boys. They need to be spanked and sent to timeout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Amazing how in November, the voters were enlightened, informed, responsible, rational, insightful, prescient and brilliant. After all, they overwhelmingly elected The Messiah. Now, only a few short months later, voters are stupid, ignorant, short sighted and self centered whiners.

I will cheer when the Sac Bee, like other liberal Obama cheerleaders in the DBM bites the dust.


25 posted on 05/20/2009 8:24:13 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Some call it the “Excremento Bee”........


26 posted on 05/20/2009 8:25:33 PM PDT by jcon40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

27 posted on 05/20/2009 8:28:38 PM PDT by listenhillary (Rahm Emmanuel slip - A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

Not just the politicians in the unemployment line, but 100,000 CA State employees. They’ve got do-nothing, suck on the taxpayer tit non-jobs. There are 75,000 more of these parasites than there were 15 years ago! At least most parasites know how to avoid killing their host. These parasites are stupid as a hairball and are most definitely killing the host.


28 posted on 05/20/2009 8:29:25 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: randita

My favorite quote today:

“If you look at the history of special elections in California, it appears to me that they dont work.
People just dont like being told to go back to the polls.”
—Arnold Schwarzenegger, May 20, 2009

A better quote would have been:
“If you look at the vote, it is clear that voters are fed up with bloated government and demand
massive cuts in the size and scope of government. We will deliver.”


29 posted on 05/20/2009 8:37:19 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

Dear Mizzz Sill. It appears that your staff if woefully incompetent. But then you’re all liberal stooges, and that makes that assertion redundant.


30 posted on 05/20/2009 8:40:39 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Where the HELL did you get Andrea Shea King from????

Andrea She King is a Freeper, host her own conservative politics radio station of Patriot Radio and is an extremely well spoken, intelligent, on point conservative who’ve I’ve personally met and was highly impressed with.

The report on Limbaugh came from her website, no author is quoted in the original Bee story only the editors explanation re. the original story.

You owe her an huge apology.


31 posted on 05/20/2009 8:55:25 PM PDT by Brytani (No Taxation Without Birth Certification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

Please ask the Mod’s to correct your post re: Andrea Shea King being the writer of the SacBee story.

Andrea She King had this story on her Radio Patriot page but did not write the original story.

As you can see from a comment on here, at least one freeper belived she was the writer of the original story and made statements against Andrea.

Thanks


32 posted on 05/20/2009 8:59:05 PM PDT by Brytani (No Taxation Without Birth Certification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

Oh duh!!! You ARE Andrea!!! Grin.....but you know what I meant.....lol


33 posted on 05/20/2009 8:59:57 PM PDT by Brytani (No Taxation Without Birth Certification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787; calcowgirl
Hey! Look at me! Now I'm famous at the Sac-O-Bee:

moonberg wrote on 05/20/2009 01:37:57 PM:

I'm curious about this free republic version of the Bee editorial. It appears to have been posted by a "SmithL" and all the comments following it are addressed to SmithL. What is free republic and how do we know that what is published there is what it is purported to be? I'm not arguing with anyone, just wondering what is going on here and wanting to look deeper.


34 posted on 05/20/2009 9:12:11 PM PDT by SmithL (The Golden State demands all of your gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
Apparently David Holwerk is trying to outdo Nancy Pelosi for the title of Worst Lying Liberal ever.

Wait until one of the other Editors get a dose of guilt and spills the beans.

Wonder how many subscriptions were canceled today. LOL

35 posted on 05/20/2009 9:17:54 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (One Man's Messiah is another Man's Fuhrer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
Later in the day, the offensive editorial was removed and replaced with a more "reasonable" one that sided with voters. When contacted by show producer Dave Logan to inquire why the switch out, Melanie Sill, Sacbee editor and senior vice president, Editorial Administration Department, claimed the first editorial was a draft of notes, "thoughts" put together on a page, and because they were on deadline, someone mistakenly published the piece. It was never intended to be published. "It was a mistake", she assured him. I bet it was. Ms. Sill assured Dave that this "mistake" appeared only in the online edition. The Sacbee's paper version went out with the current editorial. We checked the morning edition and she's correct. Has it ever happened before? "Yes," she admitted. "But nothing like this."

36 posted on 05/20/2009 9:28:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brytani

Sorry for the confusion.

My original post about this can be found at my blogsite:

http://radiopatriot.blogspot.com/2009/05/sacbee-scolds-voters-then-hides-after.html

PS I don’t have 5 to 10 boyfriends at my section 8 apartment. At last count it was only three! LOL...


37 posted on 05/20/2009 9:29:45 PM PDT by patriotgal1787 ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

I didn’t figure you had 5 to 10 in your apt, 3-4 sounded better....grin


38 posted on 05/20/2009 9:33:12 PM PDT by Brytani (No Taxation Without Birth Certification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

Michelle Malkin has picked up the story...

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/21/what-the-sacramento-bee-really-thinks-of-voters/


39 posted on 05/20/2009 9:41:47 PM PDT by patriotgal1787 ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

ruh-roh! They’ve got your ticket! LOL.


40 posted on 05/20/2009 9:42:08 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

Excellent work in saving the original!
There’s at least four links to your post in the SacBee comments section.


41 posted on 05/20/2009 9:43:25 PM PDT by Galt2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
oh, and don't forget this oldie but goodie - Nov. 1994 after the Republican wave took the US House -

“Some thoughts on those angry voters. Ask parents of any two-year-old and they can tell you about those temper tantrums: the stomping feet, the rolling eyes, the screaming. It's clear that the anger controls the child and not the other way around. It's the job of the parent to teach the child to control the anger and channel it in a positive way. Imagine a nation full of uncontrolled two-year-old rage. The voters had a temper tantrum last week....Parenting and governing don't have to be dirty words: the nation can't be run by an angry two-year-old.”
— ABC World News Tonight anchor Peter Jennings in his daily ABC Radio commentary, November 14.

Those journos just don't like having their tax buddies lose, do they?

42 posted on 05/20/2009 9:45:50 PM PDT by Galt2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

bttt


43 posted on 05/20/2009 10:20:06 PM PDT by knews_hound (I for one welcome our new Insect overlords!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

The second editorial is rather reasonable. The first is insulting. No wonder they are shedding readers.


44 posted on 05/21/2009 1:31:10 AM PDT by altair (My vote didn't count, I voted in California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

WOW! First I’ve seen the voting %’s - what an awesome / awe inspiring statement it makes!


45 posted on 05/21/2009 5:50:16 AM PDT by Made In The USA (BO stinks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
LibertarianInExile said: Voters just didn't have enough "faith in democracy"...so they VOTED.

Amazing, isn't it? "Democracy" no longer means that the people vote to make political decisions. It evidently means that people support the power of government to oversee "fairness" and to "empathize" with people.

In order to be "democratic" we must all support every "feel-good" bit of legislation passed by those who know better than we what is good for us.

46 posted on 05/21/2009 3:31:41 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Brytani

Oops,targetted the wrong person. My humble apolgies to Andrea King.


47 posted on 05/22/2009 10:35:28 AM PDT by sergeantdave (obuma is the anti-Lincoln, trying to re-establish slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson