Outspoken beauty pageant winner denies implants
Posted on 05/13/2009 3:04:56 PM PDT by Syncro
LIBERAL TALIBAN ISSUES FATWA AGAINST MISS CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2009
Not even Dick Cheney can incite the blood-curdling rage of liberals at the sight of a sexy Evangelical Christian. Paula Jones, Katherine Harris, Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and, most recently, Miss California, Carrie Prejean, have all come under a frenzy of attacks from liberals.
Christians are supposed to be fat, balding sweaty little men with bad complexions. It's liberals who are supposed to be the sexy ones. (I know that from watching "The West Wing" and all movies starring Julia Roberts.)
But sadly for liberals, in real life, the fat, balding sweaty little guy with the bad complexion is Perez Hilton and the smoking-hot babe is Carrie Prejean.
This apparent contradiction incites violent anger in liberals, triggering their famous "flight or flight" response. So liberal masturbators are, once again, launching furious attacks on a beautiful Christian in a fit of pique similar to the one directed at Joan of Arc.
First, the Miss USA contest held a press conference to announce that Prejean had breast implants. Take a Christian position in public and Satan's handmaidens will turn all your secrets into front-page news.
Next, a photographer released a single cheesecake photo of Prejean. This prompted liberal reporters who have never met a Christian to proclaim that Christians were outraged by the photo. Liberals believe abortion is a sacrament, but smoking, wearing short skirts and modeling lingerie are mortal sins. (And if wearing women's underwear is a basis for being disqualified from the pageant, that's the end of Perez Hilton's judging career.)
Then on Monday some genuine "semi-nude" photos were released. These were not what we'd call appropriate for a Christian. In a curiously similar attack, the left's final attempt to destroy Paula Jones was to lure her into appearing naked in Penthouse magazine. Oh well.
Christians aren't people who believe they are without sin; they're people who know they're sinners and are awestruck by God's grace in sending his only Son to take the punishment they deserve.
This is in contradistinction to liberals, all of whom believe they're on a fast track to heaven on the basis of being "basically good" people -- and also believe that anyone who disagrees with that theological view is evil.
Finally (so far, anyway), reporters gleefully released the divorce records of Prejean's parents. Because when you want the truth, what is more reliable than angry accusations traded in the middle of an acrimonious divorce?
Liberals used the divorce papers to argue that Prejean had some deep-seated psychological disturbance causing her to oppose gay marriage. Symptoms of this debilitating illness include a belief in some sort of "god" and a reverence for the Bible.
It's not as if Prejean's special talent in the Miss USA contest was to perform an opposite-sex marriage. (Or, as the president and I call it, "marriage.") She didn't even volunteer her "controversial" views on marriage. Rather, she was asked for her opinion on gay marriage and gave it -- in an answer wrapped in so many layers of sugar it took 10 minutes to get to the point.
"Well, I think it's great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that's how I was raised, and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman."
What a vicious hate-monger! Any second there I was expecting her to bust out a "by golly!" or an "oh my gosh!" Angry gay-marriage supporters should be happy they didn't get my version of that answer. It contains some terms you won't find in your Bible.
Liberals wouldn't attack James Dobson with the amount of bile they've directed at a 21-year-old beauty contestant. It's not just Christianity -- it's women liberals hate.
Read more at AnnCoulter.Com
Now, another beautiful Christian has thrown off the liberal burqa, thereby inciting mass hysteria throughout the liberal establishment. Prejean doesn't care. She is blazing across the sky, as impotent nose-pickers jockey for a piece of her reflected light by hurling insults at her.Read the rest at AnnCoulter.Com
Ann lets them have it!
LOL - happy to see Ann Coulter be as vaguely amused at the left’s moral outrage over Prejean’s “racy” photos. It’s always funny when they get moralistic.
From Chairman Ann:Breaking: Gay Marriage Opponent Topless Photos Leaked
May 6, 2009, 7:03 PM BREAKING! - Gay Marriage Opponent Topless Photos Leaked May 5, 2009, 2:15 PM Someone should tell the angry gays about Obama's position on gay marriage - Media Irate At Miss CA’s ‘Topless’ Photo
The newly surfaced photos are not sitting well with her conservative Christian supporters."
(At least according to non-Christians and liberals.)
Ideological burqa. That's gonna leave a mark. BTT.
!?!?!!!???!!!
great column!
LOL, That's gonna leave a mark.
There’s gonna be a few bumps in the road when liberals try to get into heaven.
LOL. Ann hits her mark with a Coulter IED
Buy that Broad a Steak, smoking hot column! Liberals do hate women or they wouldn’t keep forcing them to have abortions.
Pray for America, Our Troops and Women Hurt by Abortion
Bang! Another one just went off.
lol
Buy her book, she likes steak.
I haven’t had a chance to read the whole column yet, now that is FUNNY!
Stand strong Carrie Prejean- your famous and we love you!!
I’ve often wondered what ‘thoughtful liberals’ do after stumbling onto one of Ann’s columns like this. Perhaps their heads just explode.
And not let us not forget the writer herself.
___________________________________________ Pretty Ann comes out with another zinger.
Pray for America
Liberals could care less. They want their crimes hushed up. They want to dig dirt and test for dirt. They had the dirt preplanned and pre-readied in case she would say something to barely pointing at the pervs’ behaviors.
As far as Freudian knee jerking, it’s liberals who have the problem... or, worse, since they premeditated the questions and a response to this, it makes them virtual murderers in emotional lust for it.
As for the naked beauty, I suppose liberals never read Song of Song and its holyness. I suppose Ann is right, liberals start to have a lot more in common with the 72 de-virgining Taleban guilt worship from hell than they have with life.
As for hating women, indeed, the hypocritical envy of liberals abound on this subject in their smearing the beauty’s beauty, as if it were a sin to acknowledge blessedness. The full kill kilt is fast becoming theirs only, so “progressive” and deliberate.
Ain’t that rewarding?
LOL
Not even Dick Cheney can incite the blood-curdling rage of liberals at the sight of a sexy Evangelical Christian. Paula Jones, Katherine Harris, Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and, most recently, Miss California, Carrie Prejean, have all come under a frenzy of attacks from liberals.
Christians are supposed to be fat, balding sweaty little men with bad complexions. It’s liberals who are supposed to be the sexy ones. (I know that from watching “The West Wing” and all movies starring Julia Roberts.)
But sadly for liberals, in real life, the fat, balding sweaty little guy with the bad complexion is Perez Hilton and the smoking-hot babe is Carrie Prejean.
This apparent contradiction incites violent anger in liberals, triggering their famous “fight or flight” response. So liberal masturbators are, once again, launching furious attacks on a beautiful Christian in a fit of pique similar to the one directed at Joan of Arc.
First, the Miss USA contest held a press conference to announce that Prejean had breast implants. Take a Christian position in public and Satan’s handmaidens will turn all your secrets into front-page news.
Next, a photographer released a single cheesecake photo of Prejean. This prompted liberal reporters who have never met a Christian to proclaim that Christians were outraged by the photo. Liberals believe abortion is a sacrament, but smoking, wearing short skirts and modeling lingerie are mortal sins. (And if wearing women’s underwear is a basis for being disqualified from the pageant, that’s the end of Perez Hilton’s judging career.)
Then on Monday some genuine “semi-nude” photos were released. These were not what we’d call appropriate for a Christian. In a curiously similar attack, the left’s final attempt to destroy Paula Jones was to lure her into appearing naked in Penthouse magazine. Oh well.
Christians aren’t people who believe they are without sin; they’re people who know they’re sinners and are awestruck by God’s grace in sending his only Son to take the punishment they deserve.
This is in contradistinction to liberals, all of whom believe they’re on a fast track to heaven on the basis of being “basically good” people — and also believe that anyone who disagrees with that theological view is evil.
Finally (so far, anyway), reporters gleefully released the divorce records of Prejean’s parents. Because when you want the truth, what is more reliable than angry accusations traded in the middle of an acrimonious divorce?
Liberals used the divorce papers to argue that Prejean had some deep-seated psychological disturbance causing her to oppose gay marriage. Symptoms of this debilitating illness include a belief in some sort of “god” and a reverence for the Bible.
It’s not as if Prejean’s special talent in the Miss USA contest was to perform an opposite-sex marriage. (Or, as the president and I call it, “marriage.”) She didn’t even volunteer her “controversial” views on marriage. Rather, she was asked for her opinion on gay marriage and gave it — in an answer wrapped in so many layers of sugar it took 10 minutes to get to the point.
“Well, I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that’s how I was raised, and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman.”
What a vicious hate-monger! Any second there I was expecting her to bust out a “by golly!” or an “oh my gosh!” Angry gay-marriage supporters should be happy they didn’t get my version of that answer. It contains some terms you won’t find in your Bible.
Liberals wouldn’t attack James Dobson with the amount of bile they’ve directed at a 21-year-old beauty contestant. It’s not just Christianity — it’s women liberals hate.
From Jean-Paul Sartre, Pablo Picasso and Bertrand Russell, who treated women — mostly their mistresses — like dogs, to Teddy Kennedy and Bill Clinton in our own day, liberals are ferocious misogynists. They share Muslims’ opinion of women, differing only to the extent that liberals also support a women’s right to have an abortion and to perform lap dances.
You’d be better off in a real burqa than under the authority of a liberal American male.
I’m not sure we needed a psychological profile of Prejean to figure out why she holds the same position on gay marriage as: the president, the vice president, the secretary of state, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, John Edwards and his mistress, and the vast majority of the American people.
But what is crying out for an explanation is why every bubble-head TV news anchorette from a nice, churchgoing red state ends up adopting the political views of Karl Marx.
From Katie Couric on CBS to Norah O’Donnell on MSNBC, the whole stable of TV anchorettes weirdly have the exact same politics as their liberal masters. It’s the ideological burqa women are required to wear to work in the mainstream media. As with a conventional burqa, it enforces conformity and severely restricts the vision.
The only way to protect yourself is to do the liberal male’s bidding, as the bubble-head anchorettes do, or stand on the rock of Christianity.
Now, another beautiful Christian has thrown off the liberal burqa, thereby inciting mass hysteria throughout the liberal establishment. Prejean doesn’t care. She is blazing across the sky, as impotent nose-pickers jockey for a piece of her reflected light by hurling insults at her.
COPYRIGHT 2009 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
1130 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106
Hate to dissuade you from your otherwise correct post - but being a christian is about beliefs - not looks...heh. We are just lucky...
Paula Jones of Penthouse fame? Not sexy, not Christian. Bill Clinton really knows how to pick ‘em.
Gotta love Ann. Like usual, she hits the bull’s eye. Reminds me of her terrific columns on liberals’ hysterical reactions to Mel Gibson’s “The Passion”.
Ann doesn’t give ‘em hell, she just gives them the truth and they think it’s hell.
.jpg)
Compare and contrast ....
Out of the park Ann. You hit it out of the park.
Ann Coulter tells it like it is again. She sure does have a way with words.
Ann can say it in a way like no other! 5 stars once again! :)
Sin leaves its marks on the visage of its practicioners.
From Jean-Paul Sartre, Pablo Picasso and Bertrand Russell, who treated women -- mostly their mistresses -- like dogs, to Teddy Kennedy and Bill Clinton in our own day, liberals are ferocious misogynists. They share Muslims' opinion of women, differing only to the extent that liberals also support a women's right to have an abortion and to perform lap dances.
One might say it is a deep-seated insecurity that drives this...
You'd be better off in a real burqa than under the authority of a liberal American male.
They are not males in the traditional sense.....
Someone buy that woman some heavy-leather foundation garments with big metal studs in them .... with a set of metal elbow-protectors for crushing rouged nancy-boy cheekbones ..... lol!
Slick doesn't pick 'em so much as pick on them..... ask Juanita Brodrick, Paula Jones, Julie Hyatt Steele.
However, on inspection His Loathesomeness might turn out to have some parallelisms in his attitude toward women with the nasty little Perez.
-that’s a semi-pleasant amusing thought! ;^)
This is something that has been described as "defining deviancy down" for liberals and their client groups, and "defining deviancy up" for the group they want to attack -- "normal" Caucasian American families. The phrase "defining deviancy down" was invented by the late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan in the pages of The American Scholar in 1993, and its complement by Charles Krauthammer in an essay in The New Republic in the same year.
Always moving the bar for "normal" behavior is a standard, intellectually dishonest polemical tactic of the German school of destructive Leftism.
“It’s not just Christianity — it’s women liberals hate.”
They hate femininity.
They hate female fertility.
And the bonus is, they'll actually bring forth, they'll help the U.S. keep its population going, and they won't have the baby on the wrong side of the blanket or name it according to their own devices before you come into the delivery room.
Excellent points!
Lol, the stars are hilarious!
Wow, whadda gal.
My love for Ann borders on infidelity . . .
Paula Jones is not what I would call ‘sexy’!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.