Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buzzwords: Rephrasing Obama's lexicon
LATimes ^ | May 11, 2009 | Peter Nicholas and Jim Tankersley

Posted on 05/11/2009 3:50:26 AM PDT by CutePuppy

In the debate over his top environmental goals, President Obama is backing away from "cap and trade."

Not the policy. It's the phrase itself, deemed confusing by Democratic pollsters, that has all but disappeared from the president's vocabulary of late.

Now when Obama talks about forcing companies to bid at auction for the right to emit greenhouse gases, he is more apt to mention "market-based" proposals and "clean energy jobs," hinting at a rich new employment source.

Control the language, politicians know, and you stand a better chance of controlling the debate. So the Obama administration, in its push to enact sweeping energy and healthcare policies, has begun refining the phrases it uses in an effort to shape public opinion.

Words that have been vetted in focus groups and polls are seeping into the White House lexicon, while others considered too scary or confounding are falling away.

Today, aides in Obama's Council on Environmental Quality will meet with a research and marketing group that is promoting an alternative to the phrase "global warming," which some pollsters say fails to capture the idea of greenhouse gases threatening the environment.

"There is value in trying to get the messaging right," said a senior White House environmental aide, who was not authorized to speak on the record. "Because at the end of the day this is tricky policy. ... We want to make sure we're talking in a way that people understand."

.....

Results of a recent poll by the Mellman Group were also shared with the White House. ... The survey tested 19 phrases and found "clean energy jobs" had the widest appeal, with 42% of the respondents "very enthusiastic" about it.

"Cap and trade," by contrast, ranked next to last, with only 7% registering enthusiasm.

.....

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clintonspeak; language; lexicon; newspeak; obamaspeak; prmachine
Control the language, politicians know, and you stand a better chance of controlling the debate.

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past - Ministry of Truth, George Orwell's 1984

1 posted on 05/11/2009 3:50:26 AM PDT by CutePuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

I’m sure the reason they’re re-working their language has something to do with the remarkable strength and irresistable persuasive power of their position.


2 posted on 05/11/2009 3:55:43 AM PDT by Steely Tom (RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
"There is value in trying to get the messaging right,"

More like, there is value in confusing the people so they think we are doing something completely different....T R A N S P A R E N C Y ! ! ! !

3 posted on 05/11/2009 3:56:23 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

I like the olden days when it was just called “lying”.


4 posted on 05/11/2009 4:05:39 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

“Control the language, politicians know, and you stand a better chance of controlling the debate.”

Hmmmmmm. And what happens if we can get control of the teleprompter, cuz we know Barry Zer-O can’t speak without it..........


5 posted on 05/11/2009 4:11:17 AM PDT by roaddog727 (Built Ford tough not Obama weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
Control the language, politicians know, and you stand a better chance of controlling the debate. So the Obama administration, in its push to enact sweeping energy and healthcare policies, has begun refining the phrases it uses in an effort to shape public opinion.

According to the Government, this polar bear cub emits harmful greenhouse gas which contributes to global warming.

6 posted on 05/11/2009 4:14:10 AM PDT by 6SJ7 (atlasShruggedInd: ON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
I believe the operative term became "parsing", such as "it depends on what the meaning of the word is is".

Seriously, though, controlling and driving the message and defining the opponent(s) is extremely important and should not be discounted.

We [should] have learned this both from Clinton's PR machine, as well as from failures of HillaryCare, success of Gingrich's Contract with America and complete lack of coherent communication of GOP policies from two Bush administrations and Republican Congress (majority or minority).

7 posted on 05/11/2009 4:31:11 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Sooooo, American’s favour “market based” propsals and “jobs”. I guess this surprises Democrats/Socialists.
American’s continue to have Conservative core values!


8 posted on 05/11/2009 4:51:44 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

9 posted on 05/11/2009 4:55:03 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

It is good to hear, but I don’t think it surprises Democrats, or they would not have to resort to focus groups or “listening tours” or push-polls with false choices for answers...

Democrats don’t give a hoot what the core values of majority are. What they really care about is knowing the language that people with core values use, only to use it against them, to lure and seduce the same people into supporting and/or “voting” for programs that will allow Democrats to continue to lie, cheat and steal from these Americans.


10 posted on 05/11/2009 5:15:25 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
Control the language ... and you stand a better chance of controlling the debate. So the Obama administration ... has begun refining the phrases it uses in an effort to shape public opinion.
"All warfare is based on deception." (Sun Tzu)

See Barry, I know what YOU'RE up to -- I read the dam book!

"If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles."
I'm now prolly on some fricken terrorist watch list. Well, whoop-dee-doo. Molon Labe baby!
11 posted on 05/11/2009 5:16:21 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
Agreed. We need a new contract to win. Bush for some reason refused to control the political thoughtspace and counter the lies of the Left.

The result is McCain, which result is Obama.

12 posted on 05/11/2009 5:41:31 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Hence my tagline


13 posted on 05/11/2009 6:05:16 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Life, Liberty and the Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27; All
:-) "INGSOC," eh?

Speaking of 1984:
The Democrats' Dictionary - Rasmussen Report, by Debra J. Saunders, May 10, 2009


14 posted on 05/11/2009 6:39:14 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson