Posted on 05/06/2009 8:28:54 AM PDT by doug from upland
FEC Complaint Filed To Cancel Hillary Clinton 2006 Immunity Deal
New Evidence Offered of Hillary Clinton’s Admissions To Raising Illegal Funds
May 2, 2009, Washington, DC. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former President Bill Clinton, Harold Ickes and the Hillary Clinton for Senate Committee, Inc. have become the subjects of a new Federal Election Commission Complaint filed today.
An original FEC complaint was filed against then-Senator Clinton and her agents including President Clinton, DNC Chair Ed Rendell, Finance Director David Rosen and Treasurer Andrew Grossman in July 2001. It detailed the facts surrounding the illegal solicitation and false reporting of more than $1.9 million expended by Hollywood dot-com millionaire Peter Paul at the request and direction of Senator Clinton and her agents. It resulted in the indictment and trial on three counts of FEC fraud of David Rosen, Hillary Clinton's National Finance Director, in 2005 and the Fine and Conciliation Agreement with Andrew Grossman as Treasurer of the New York Senate 2000 Joint Fundraising committee that hosted the largest fundraising event of Hillary Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign.
The January 2006 "confidential" FEC conciliation agreement included the immunization of Hillary and Bill Clinton and others associated with Hillary Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign from further investigation by the FEC, subject to the filing of a fourth corrected, accurate FEC Report on January 30, 2006, that legally reports the $1.2 million plus expenditure contributed by Peter Paul.
The new FEC complaint presents evidence that Hillary Clinton and her campaign have filed yet another false FEC report that would violate the Conciliation agreement and compel the FEC to void its grant of immunity to Hillary Clinton and resume its unfinished investigation based on the new evidence. As the complaint concludes:
"The false reporting of [Paul's 1.2 million] expenditures as nonfederal contributions to New York Senate 2000 was and is a violation of the reporting requirements of 2 U.S.C. Section 434(b). The activities of [Hillary Clinton and the other Respondents] in making false statements which resulted in such contributions’ being improperly reported as nonfederal contributions to New York Senate 2000 violated 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 (false statements) and/or 18 U.S.C. Section 2 (aiding and abetting)."
When the FEC previously decided to close its file as to Hillary Clinton, it stated that, “Any potential liability of Senator Clinton would be based on whether she knowingly accepted prohibited or excessive in-kind corporate contributions.” Such evidence was lacking then, but not now. Ironically enough, in the context of defending against Peter Paul’s fraud complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court, Hillary Clinton and her agents, David Rosen and James Levin have filed written statements under oath that prove Mrs. Clinton knowingly accepted prohibited, excessive contributions in connection with Event 39, by soliciting, directing and coordinating Mr. Paul’s underwriting of this event.
The significance of the new evidence was explained by California Attorney D. Colette Wilson on behalf of Clinton 's "unreported" donor, Peter Paul:
"The filing presents new evidence -- out of the mouths of Hillary herself and her agents -- proving that Hillary lied when she said her largest campaign fundraising event --Event 39-- wasn't a Hillary Clinton for Senate event. That's ALL it was. This new evidence proves it was a sham to claim that it was a Democratic party event, in order to get away with claiming that Peter Paul’s expenditures were soft money donated to her Joint Fundraising Committee, New York Senate 2000, rather than federally proscribed, hard money to Hillary Clinton for Senate, the intended beneficiary.”
Clinton and her agents took the money and ran.
Must be scary with the inmates in control of the crazy house now..
Really ...
She did.......so far. The corrupt legal system has let her skate. Until she retires and goes home to bake cookies, I will retain my Hillary dartboard and keep throwing darts when I can. The FEC went after Ted Stevens. Justice is looking at John Edwards for some measley payments to his little slut and mother of his child. And Hillary gets a pass. Nope, we are going to keep at it.
Where's the "Not this #@*& again" picture?
jezzzz snipers everywhere....*grins*
There is evidence that was not available during the 2005 trial of her campaign finance chairman, David Rosen. It was hidden by her pals in the US Atty’s office, Eastern District New York. She has never been asked questions under oath, and key witnesses have never been called.
So if a crime is committed and someone gets away with it, but there is new evidence, we just forget it? I’d don’t know that any damage will be done because of this, but I do know thing for sure ———— NOTHING WILL EVER HAPPEN TO HER IF PEOPLE JUST CLOSE THEIR EYES, SIT ON THEIR ASSES, AND DO NOTHING. It’s easy to just sit back and complain. It’s harder to try to actually do something. I’m going to continue to try to do something.
I’m glad you’re like the Energizer Bunny!
nothing we didn’t know about hildybeast here
Here is my theory . . . she will slide AGAIN . . . UNLESS the dems are looking to ditch her.
I am so shocked (yeah . . . shocked) by how this administration is so “in your face” about everything. They are not out there taking the temperature of the public and directing policy according to whatever way the wind blows. They take the temp of the FAR FAR FAR left and shove it down our throats. So . . . I keep wondering . . . how long will we allow this? How much more do we have to witness before we scream loud and in unison . . . ENOUGH.
Get Hitlery out of the way?
Sorry all . . . I realize I went entirely off topic here.
Thanks Doug...keep on trying!
Dart board here too.
Your efforts on this issue are valiant, but they’re also ruinous to your life, as you have pointed out in the past. That’s all you’re going to get out of it and you need to recognize it.
The operative words in your response are “NOTHING WILL EVER HAPPEN TO HER” - period. Not with the current administration, not with a Republican administration, not with ANY administration. It was unlikely before, but they’re certainly not going to take down a sitting Secretary of State. NO MATTER WHAT.
Do you think this has more traction than the issues that had many of us attending Tea Parties last month? I don’t. How many ‘average citzens’ even know who Peter Paul is? The story hasn’t been picked up by the agenda-driven MSM and it will never be. You’re throwing good money after bad.
Horrible damage is being done to this country and its Constitution right now, and that has an unfortunate minority of us upset and fighting against the changes, but what kind of headway are we making? None, apparently. Obama’s march to socialism (and worse) is the battle that we need to fight to the end.
Bill and Hillary skated. They’re demonstrably despicable lawbreakers, but the power of corrupt politicians and lawyers to overlook and rationalize should never be underestimated. They’re in the clear and always will be. It sucks, it’s wrong, but it’s reality.
Advice in 1776 —— You are a small minority. You can never defeat the British. You will lose your fortunes and you will die. Forget this revolution nonsense and go on with your lives. Just take it.
Thanks Doug...keep on trying!
Dart board here too.
Sure. Why not? The left wants a complete dictatorship, so they're just taking over. They don't need the Clinton's anymore.
I hope DJ is proven wrong in the long run...sometimes it is hard to keep going, but what can be gained by giving up?
I for one will keep on trying, writing, protesting and yes even marching on DC.
My grandchildren’s future is worth every problem I might encounter.
I admire your tenacity!
I’m Sorry. I don’t understand what price she will pay for her lying. Is this news the public never heard?? What penality will she face??
Thank you Doug. That seems to be a common complaint on FR these days or “It can’t be done”or should I say common excuse.
Go for it and I appreciate it.
Thank you for your persistence. It is easy to accept the conventional wisdom - that Slick and Hill are crooks with such strong connections as to never be brought to justice - and that seems to be what is happening. That is a perfect example of, "All that is required for evil to prevail is for good people to no nothing." or something like that.
Thank you for doing something rather than accepting "conventional wisdom"! Even the Slick ones are vulnerable to a bulldog with facts.
I do, too. I don't want to be right on this one. Maybe we'll reconvene in a couple of years...
"I for one will keep on trying, writing, protesting and yes even marching on DC."
And so will I, on the terrible policies that are coming out of this administration. These are not about a privileged person breaking the law and getting away with it. These are about changing the course of our way of life, our country and the effects on every person living in it.
It's a 'choose your battles' kind of thing.
Convicted of a felony...she can’t vote, for a while
Loss of law license...won’t matter to her
Fine...paid by one of her “funds”
Not much to gain is there?
Hillary has not yet paid any price in the legal system, but consider this. On the internet, over 10 million people viewed a 13-min clip of HILLARY! UNCENSORED. She came very close to the nomination. We may have done enough damage to her to keep her from the position she wanted all her life and to which she believed she was entitled. If that is the case, I feel very good about what we did.
Oh, and if the film helped stop her, sorry that we didn’t know in time to do one about the cocaine-using, community organizing, cokehead communist from Kenya.
FEC Complaint Presents New Evidence Of Allegations of Hillary Clinton’s Role In Illegal Funds In Effort to Void 2006 Immunity Deal
A New FEC Complaint was filed today by D. Colette Wilson Esq.with the Federal Election Commission to reopen MUR 5225 based on new evidence of earlier allegations Hillary Clinton’s role in illegally soliciting, coordinating, accepting and directing more than $1.2 million contributed to her 2000 Senate campaign. The FEC earlier fined Mrs Clinton’s joint fundraising committee for hiding more than $700,000 of $1.2 million donated by Hollywood entrepreneur Peter Paul, in three separate FEC reports. As part of the settlement agreement in January 2006, Mrs Clinton received immunity from any further investigation into a variety of illegalities investigated by the FEC and FBI.
Any potential liability of Senator Clinton would be based on whether she knowingly accepted prohibited or excessive in-kind corporate contributions.
Washington, DC (PRWEB) .May 7, 2009, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and the Hillary Clinton for Senate Committee, Inc. Have become the subjects of a new Federal Election Commission Complaint filed by attorney D. Colette Wilson today.
The original FEC complaint filed against Senator Clinton and her agents, President Clinton, Finance Director David Rosen and Treasurer Andrew Grossman, in July 2001, MUR 5225, exposed the false reporting of more than $1.2 million expended by Hollywood dot-com millionaire Peter Paul at the request of Senator Clinton and her agents. Clinton Finance Director David Rosen was indicted and tried for FEC fraud in 2005 as a result (US v Rosen, CR# 03-1219), and a Conciliation Agreement with Andrew Grossman Treasurer of NY Senate included a fine of the Clinton campaign and an immunity agreement protecting Senator Clinton from further investigation of illegal acts.
The January 2006 “confidential” FEC immunization of Hillary Clinton in the Senate campaign required the filing of a fourth corrected FEC Report on January 30, 2006, to legally report the $1.2 million plus expenditure contributed by Peter Paul to underwrite Event 39, hidden in the Campaign’s previous reports.
The new FEC complaint presents new evidence that the latest FEC Report by Hillary Clinton and her campaign violates the Conciliation agreement thereby compelling the FEC to void its grant of immunity. It states:
“The false reporting of [Paul’s 1.2 million expenditures as nonfederal contributions to New York Senate 2000 was and is a violation of the reporting requirements of 2 U.S.C. Section 434(b). The activities of [Hillary Clinton and the other Respondents in making false statements which resulted in such contributions’ being improperly reported as nonfederal contributions to New York Senate 2000 violated 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 (false statements) and/or 18 U.S.C. Section 2 (aiding and abetting).”
When the FEC decided to close its file as to Hillary Clinton in 2006, it stated that, “Any potential liability of Senator Clinton would be based on whether she knowingly accepted prohibited or excessive in-kind corporate contributions.” Such evidence was lacking then, according to the FEC. But not now, according to Wilson,who believes that In defending against Peter Paul’s fraud complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court, Hillary Clinton and her agents David Rosen and James Levin filed sworn declarations that prove Mrs. Clinton knowingly accepted prohibited, excessive contributions in underwriting Event 39, by soliciting, directing and coordinating Mr. Paul’s in-kind contribution.
In addition to Hillary Clinton’s sworn declaration admitting for the first time that the funds she solicited were for her US Senate campaign and not for a Joint Fundraising Committee, a transcript of a phone conversation she had which details her personal role in accepting and planning the expenditures made on her behalf was presented for the first time.
Attorney D. Colette Wilson, on behalf of Clinton ‘s “unreported” donor, Peter Paul stated:
“The filing presents new evidence — out of the mouths of Hillary herself and her agents — proving that Hillary lied when she said her largest campaign fundraising event —Event 39— wasn’t a Hillary Clinton for Senate event. That’s all it was. This new evidence proves it was a sham to claim that it was a Democratic party event, in order to get away with claiming that Peter Paul’s expenditures were soft money donated to her Joint Fundraising Committee, New York Senate 2000, rather than federally proscribed, hard money to Hillary Clinton for Senate, the intended beneficiary”
//
Contact: Capstar Communications, (702) 516 7213, capstarllc@gmail.com
D. Colette Wilson Esq. (760) 580 0561 www.paulvclinton.com
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.