Posted on 05/01/2009 8:25:18 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
A dinosaur bone buried for 80 million years has yielded a mix of proteins and microstructures resembling cells. The finding is important because it should resolve doubts about a previous report that also claimed to have extracted dino tissue from fossils...
(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...
Dinosaur Blood Protein, Cells Recovered
http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430b
Dinosaur Soft Tissues and Blood (cool micrograph pictures!)
http://www.detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html#Dinosaur%20Soft%20Tissues%20and%20Blood
Are Secular Geologists Ready to Consider a Global Flood?
http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430a
Ping!
For more, see:
Dinosaur Blood Protein, Cells Recovered
http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430b
Dinosaur Soft Tissues and Blood (cool micrograph pictures!)
http://www.detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html#Dinosaur%20Soft%20Tissues%20and%20Blood
Are Secular Geologists Ready to Consider a Global Flood?
http://creationsafaris.com/crev200904.htm#20090430a
This article proves you wrong.. You keep saying the Earth is 6000 years old.
I don’t see any ‘young’ evidence in this article.
I’m not talking about their belief in darwood’s materialist creation myth, I’m talking about the data. The DATA is much more supportive of Young Earth Creation.
OK - it's Friday & I'm ready to be entertained.
How is this evidence?
Yes. “More” evidence...........................................lol!
No matter how they try to spin it, finding blood and soft tissue in two dinos (and counting) is far more supportive of YEC than old earth, uniformitarian evolution.
I’m saying the article proved you wrong....
OK, I’m game.. how...
How so?
They have found blood and soft tissue in two dinos now. One supposedly dating back 65 mya, the other dating back 80 mya. This is what one would expect of biblical creation is true, whereas this is the last thing one would expect if deep-time evolution is true.
More interesting would be the explanation of how such proteins and cell structures endured intact over the past 80 million years.
Because finding blood and soft tissue is exactly what you would expect if YEC is true, whereas it is the last thing you would expect if dino went extinct tens of millions of years ago.
See multiple replies above.
The article doesn't say those structures where intact, it doesn't give any indication of the level of decomposition of those structures. It is easy to figure out though how they may have survived. What causes decomposition? Exposure to air, microbes, light, etc. Absent those things, decomposition may stop or slow down. It is not an unknown scenario.
Viable DNA? Jurassic Park here we come!
Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts
2 Peter 3:3 (KJV)
Thanks for the ping!
“Life finds a way.”
“A dinosaur bone buried for 80 million years...
encased in sandstone for 80 million years...
reveal more about dinosaur evolution...”
Do you have a point, or are you mearly trying to illustrate you profound ignorance?
How soft and bloody are these finds? Like the steak in my fridge? Or are they petrified, crystalline?
How soft and bloody are these finds? Like the steak in my fridge? Or are they petrified, crystalline?
Thought you might be interested. Also see reply #2
They didn't. If they had, they'd be petrified. Bone isn't the most porous stuff in the world, but it IS porous. There's absolutely no way in hell anything with soft tissue in it is millions of years old.
Wow... that’s “merely’ and “your”.
The point is obvious; anybody who can't grasp it is in denial which is worse than profound ignorance.
When you get your paper published demonstrating that, let us know.
Enough is enough. Please stop posting interesting scientific articles with your insane rantings that aren’t even supported by the text.
Our present living world is around 6K years of age. The planet viewed as a collection of rocks is older than that, but not tens of millions or billions of years old. Robert Bass once redid Lord Kelvin's heat equations for the planet and included a maximal figure for radioactive elements, and got an upper bound for age of around 200M years.
2 Corinthians 4:4...the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
Romans 1:20...For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.
21For even though they knew God, they did not [c]honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22Professing to be wise, they became fools,
23and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.
24Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them.
25For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
Please add me to your ping list. Every time I read one of your threads I learn something new and the debate is always entertaining.
So if the world was created yesterday, with you with all your memories created as a lie within you, then finding a memory of 80 million years ago would be evidence that the world was created yesterday.
Is that how you see it?
It’s sad when not even conservatives can think for themselves. It you want to believe darwood’s atheist creation myth, go right ahead. As for me, I will continue to glorify God’s wondrous creation!
Basic cold, hard, reality: the tens of millions of years which you’ve been told all your life separate us from the dinosaur age has turned out to be a bunch of bullshit. Deal with it.
Welcome aboard the HMS Creation. We are ship-shape, battle ready, and stand ready to take on survivors from the badly listing HMS Beagle :o)
I don’t have a problem with creationists. I would just deny them the benefit of evolutionary science (modern medicine against evolved diseases, modern high yield food crops). I support, and extend your religious belief.
My example is that most Christian and Roumanian prince Vlad Tepes, a.k.a Dracula, who expressed his desire to support and extend the Turkish ambassadors’ habit of not doffing their hats in front of him, and so had their hats nailed to their heads.
B
Huh, aren't you contradicting yourself saying it isn't tens of millions or billions of years old and citing as evidence a study that gives evidence of the 200 million year old range? At that, later recalculations of Kelvin's analysis has actually increased the maximal figure, not decreased it.
http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi144.htm
So how is quoting an article thinking for yourself?
That's good to hear.
“Cause that means when Jesus comes back for the resurrection, there’ll still be something left of me to bring back to life!
...and life IS in the blood after all!
“turned out”
Not based on any evidence you have presented, or referenced.
Got any references to creationists who do like actual science rather than quote mining? Any thought experiments to help come up with a testable hypothesis?
It may come as a shock to you, but those who believe in Evolution, ID, or Theistic Evolution(like me) actually do 'think for ourselves'.
Flash! Lord Kelvin proves that one can be smart and wrong at the same time.
Could you provide a source for Bass’ argument?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.