Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's low-carbon fuel standard has oil companies anxious
Sacramento Bee ^ | Apr. 25, 2009 | Dale Kasler

Posted on 04/25/2009 5:51:53 PM PDT by Lorianne

In car-crazy California, a new fuel standard ordered by state officials to curb greenhouse gases could dramatically change how vehicles run.

It also could have a huge effect on cost.

The petroleum industry and some economists say the new standard adopted by the state Air Resources Board on Thursday will cost motorists billions, because blending gasoline will become considerably more complicated.

But state officials and environmentalists say the "low-carbon fuel standard" will actually save Californians money by reducing oil consumption and ushering in a competitive new era of biofuels and electric vehicles.

The stakes are enormous. The price of fuel can have a significant impact on the state's economic health. When gas hit $4.50 last summer, it severely hurt tourism and caused delivery companies to impose fuel surcharges.

Gasoline now sells for a relatively affordable $2.35 a gallon on average, but the state's already strict fuel formulas create a delicate balance between supply and demand. Even minor supply glitches have caused big price spikes because only a small number of refiners make gas to California's specifications.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: californiaepa; greenhousegases

1 posted on 04/25/2009 5:51:53 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

If these morons are content with paying $10 a gallon for politically correct gas then let them. They vote for the clowns that impose these stupid standards and deserve every hit that comes from it.


2 posted on 04/25/2009 5:53:13 PM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Give CA back to Mexico.


3 posted on 04/25/2009 5:54:07 PM PDT by bmwcyle (American voters can fix this world if they would just wake up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

—if I was an oil company, I’d just say goodbye and close the doors—


4 posted on 04/25/2009 5:54:35 PM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

I have a better idea. How about the oil companies refuse to make these special new fuels and just stop selling oil to California?


5 posted on 04/25/2009 5:54:56 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; thackney
Will any oil refiner have enough guts to say to Calbania, "OK, fine. We just won't sell any gasoline in this state"?

It's not like they can't pipe gasoline elsewhere, now is it? Although they'll take a hit (short-term) on sales, and long-term on piping cost, they'll make up a good chunk of it by not having to produce Calbania's weird collection of boutique blends.

Hack, d'ya still have that map showing how many blends Calbania requires, by statute?

6 posted on 04/25/2009 5:55:14 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The refining companies should just say "Sorry, there's no money in this for us. We're not going to make it."

Then let Californians walk.

L

7 posted on 04/25/2009 5:55:15 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I sure wish California would isolate itself. Build it’s own ultra expensive refineries and supply all its own fuel. Don’t drag the rest of us down with higher prices for their idiocy, jeez.


8 posted on 04/25/2009 5:56:04 PM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr; rellimpank

GMTA, gents!


9 posted on 04/25/2009 5:56:06 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“Low carbon” gasoline, that is to LOL.


10 posted on 04/25/2009 5:56:41 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
I have a better idea. How about the oil companies refuse to make these special new fuels and just stop selling oil to California?

The really hilarious part is the libs just never learn. They keep electing the same libs over and over again. My only conclusion is that they must enjoy this kind of existence.

Kinda reminds me of the morons in DC who vote Democrat year after year and are now whining about losing their school vouchers.

11 posted on 04/25/2009 6:00:41 PM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Meanwhile, oil is just seeping up out of the ground off the coast of Santa Barbara.

So much so that there is an effort underway to Stop Oil Seep. (Note the source)

Stop Oil Seep California

12 posted on 04/25/2009 6:01:24 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
But the air board decided that corn ethanol is not so great for limiting greenhouse gases. The argument goes like this: Eager to cash in on ethanol demand, farmers around the world plow up grasslands and chop down trees to make way for corn, a process that releases more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

More "feel good" liberal unintended consequences. Not that it matters to me because I don't care how much CO2 is released.

13 posted on 04/25/2009 6:01:57 PM PDT by uptoolate (Shhh. If you listen real hard, God is speaking to America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
It is so telling to listen to Obama and crew describe how their version of reality works. For example, municipal bidding and highway projects take a long time. Obama gets away with saying in a speech that the stim-pack was already yielding results in these areas (yeah, I need to find my documented proof).

I just think it is continually amazing how small minded these polits are and how a nation's wealth is created.

14 posted on 04/25/2009 6:03:31 PM PDT by Voter62vb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
It is to laugh. The reporter actually bought into the thought that these rules will be "ushering in a competitive new era of biofuels and electric vehicles"

Not that such things won't work, but did the writer notice that California is deep into it's third year of major drought with agriculture being shut down all over the place due to a lack of water.

And electric cars? California does not now have sufficient electric power for ordinary business to say nothing of millions of electric cars.

They'd need to import both biofuels and electricity ~ but that's not going to happen.

15 posted on 04/25/2009 6:05:18 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Just raise your price. No need for concern.


16 posted on 04/25/2009 6:05:43 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
Give CA back to Mexico.

A lot of good Californians who gave their lives for this country and their beloved state would take issue with that statement.

Give up one state, and you'll lose a lot more. Where do you plan to draw the line?

17 posted on 04/25/2009 6:12:36 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
—if I was an oil company, I’d just say goodbye and close the doors—

You took the words right out of my mouth.

The article claims that there are already only a few refineries who blend gasoline to California's standards. This stupid law may push a couple of them to throw in the towel.

On the other hand, the refineries may just say, "fine with us, but it's gonna cost ya".

18 posted on 04/25/2009 6:16:05 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Low carbon” gasoline, that is to LOL.
*********************************************
It’s no diferent than mandating bread with no flour...


19 posted on 04/25/2009 6:16:06 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Sell gas to the CA sheep for $10/gallon. The rest of us can get it for under 2 bucks. Wait for the idiotic dhimmicrat legislature to mandate a lower price. Then just leave the idiots to use their bikes. Monitor the Hollywood freaks to insure that they don’t use their jets. The ensuing civil war should be delightful to watch.

Schadenfreude


20 posted on 04/25/2009 6:35:54 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
If these morons are content with paying $10 a gallon for politically correct gas then let them

Make Californians burn methane or liquified natural gas (LNG) by making them convert all their vehicles to LNG.
Then eventually convert them to hydrogen -- made from electricity (from nuclear power plants since California should not import any more electricity).

21 posted on 04/25/2009 6:43:24 PM PDT by Aroostook25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

Add “cap and trade” and you are $20 a gallon.


22 posted on 04/25/2009 6:44:55 PM PDT by razorback-bert (We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

But state officials and environmentalists say the “low-carbon fuel standard” will actually save Californians money by reducing oil consumption and ushering in a competitive new era of biofuels and electric vehicles.


Yeah, these guys have sooooo much credibility. [/sarc] When this blows up in their face, watch them blame the bad guys: the chemical engineers and auto/oil executives who warned against this.


23 posted on 04/25/2009 6:49:24 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Low-carbon fuel for cars is a bit of an oxymoron. Low carbon, low “go.”


24 posted on 04/25/2009 6:56:25 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ( Obama, you're off the island!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

All the oil companies have to do is tell CA they will no longer sell oil in CA. Simple solution to the insanity the exists in CA.


25 posted on 04/25/2009 6:59:22 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

Time to buy energy stocks again...but probably better to buy Chinese stocks than USA stocks. Communist China being a more free enterprise, capitalist country than Obama’s USA.


26 posted on 04/25/2009 7:15:19 PM PDT by OldArmy52 (Mainstream Media cheered: Ascension of Castro, Chavez and now Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

The oil companies should just stop selling oil based products in California.


27 posted on 04/25/2009 7:16:20 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The petroleum industry and some economists say the new standard adopted by the state Air Resources Board on Thursday will cost motorists billions, because blending gasoline will become considerably more complicated.

But state officials and environmentalists say the "low-carbon fuel standard" will actually save Californians money by reducing oil consumption and ushering in a competitive new era of biofuels and electric vehicles.


The first sentence appears to be logical. The second sentence makes no damn sense at all.
28 posted on 04/25/2009 7:16:47 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
But state officials and environmentalists say the “low-carbon fuel standard” will actually save Californians money by reducing oil consumption and ushering in a competitive new era of biofuels and electric vehicles.

Translation: Californians will save money and reduce oil consumption because it will be too expensive to drive, therefore they will save money by not driving and they will reduce oil consumption by not driving.

In other words, it will be so expensive, you will save money by not being able to afford to spend it.

Those "state officials" are not just, idiots, they are evil idiots...

And they're planning to "save" your money on health care costs through exactly the same method...

29 posted on 04/25/2009 7:18:39 PM PDT by Zeppo (Save the cheerleader, save the world...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
The second sentence makes no damn sense at all.:
But state officials and environmentalists say the "low-carbon fuel standard" will actually save Californians money by reducing oil consumption and ushering in a competitive new era of biofuels and electric vehicles.

I think it makes sense, in a perverse sort of way.

If they make it so expensive that you can't afford to drive, you'll have to just sit at home and watch TV. Move into some apartment within walking distance of work, if you have a job. Think of all the money you'd save if you never took your car anywhere. If they keep at it and reduce your standard of living to that in North Korea, you'll be saving even MORE money.

30 posted on 04/25/2009 7:41:11 PM PDT by Wissa (I despise the liberal media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“But state officials and environmentalists say the “low-carbon fuel standard” will actually save Californians money by reducing oil consumption and ushering in a competitive new era of biofuels and electric vehicles. “

The so-called logic of morons.


31 posted on 04/25/2009 7:41:48 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Spay or Neuter your liberal today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Actually, it makes perfect sense. Low-carbon hydrocarbons are known as Hydrogen.

Of course, that does not work, so...


32 posted on 04/25/2009 7:49:50 PM PDT by patton (Oligarchy is an absorbing state in the Markov process we find ourselves in. Sigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The one scheme that works is motivating better mileage standards. Better mileage transmits to reduced internal volumes, which results in less power, less acceleration and lower terminal velocities.

The circumstance that an aircraft is more efficient traveling at higher speeds into a headwind to reduce the time exposed to unfavorable conditions is not as significant in surface transportation. Longer trip times are more than offset by increased efficiency. Whether an SUV or a long haul semi, traveling at posted speed limits on level ground due to power limitations is much more efficient than the additional 45% power requirement to allow rapid acceleration and speed limits on 5% grades.

Improved mileage does not require expensive or exotic blends of several fuel stocks and does not upset the balance of production and distribution developed over the last 100 years.

33 posted on 04/25/2009 7:50:24 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Who are these morons in the Air Resources Board? Is it totally staffed by left wing loons? Any normal state board will certainly have a majority of lwls, but there will also be a leavening of some normal people who will damp down the most gross stupidities. This board seems to be on a mission to exceed its previous ‘best’ all the time. You couldn't invent this as fiction if you tried.
34 posted on 04/25/2009 7:52:44 PM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
I live in CA. I would love for the Refiners to say thanks, but no thanks. It might wake up the Sheeple.

At that point, the Hugo Chavez wannabes in Sacramento would vote to take over the Refineries, which would be hilarious.

Let those people who love to Legislate Innovation figure out how to make fuel.

35 posted on 04/25/2009 7:58:54 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (If Hitler used a TelePrompter, we would all be speaking German...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

” It’s no different than mandating bread with no flour... “

The Pharaoh demanded the Jews make bricks without straw...


36 posted on 04/25/2009 8:00:26 PM PDT by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault
Low-carbon fuel for cars is a bit of an oxymoron. Low carbon, low “go.”

The legislature will soon repeal the laws of thermodynamics. They just get in the way of achieving the fantasy. Repeal the Law of Gravity too. We can just fly everywhere like Superman.

37 posted on 04/25/2009 8:28:13 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
That's known as water.What a joke.they want to bankrupt oil companies by doing the impossible.Even if the Oil Companies were able to produce hydrogen fuels from their stocks of petroleum I think the libs in California would still try and shut them down.

The oil companies need to tell the government of california to go too hell,the fastest way possible.

38 posted on 04/25/2009 8:38:50 PM PDT by puppypusher (The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle; pnh102

The problem is that California provides a huge amount of the food you eat. Check the boxes on the produce in your store.

Fresno
Sanger
Selma
Kingsburg
Bakersfield
Stockton
Modesto

The liberals want us out of the state because we are the last bastion between them and permanent one-party rule.

Check the bottom of every FR page: Fresno, California


39 posted on 04/25/2009 9:10:44 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

When the phony deregulation scheme failed in the early part of this decade, Gray Davis and the Dems spent all their time blaming Enron.


40 posted on 04/25/2009 9:13:58 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

It would be wonderful to see how long they would hold out without any gasoline.


41 posted on 04/25/2009 11:01:56 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half of the population is below average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; ...
Evil politicians gone mad.

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

42 posted on 04/26/2009 3:09:38 AM PDT by steelyourfaith ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." -Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Then you CA’er need to take it back.


43 posted on 04/26/2009 4:40:18 AM PDT by bmwcyle (American voters can fix this world if they would just wake up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
Then you CA’er need to take it back.

So, just like that, you're willing to roll over and allow foreign and domestic enemies to take a part of your country away without so much as a whimper?

That's disgusting. You obviously have no allegiance to what we call America.

44 posted on 04/26/2009 9:34:12 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
"Will any oil refiner have enough guts to say to Calbania, "OK, fine. We just won't sell any gasoline in this state"? "

Democrat congressional hearings and Hussein's administration already sing the praises of Kalifornica's standards. They tend to spread east.

yitbos

45 posted on 04/26/2009 10:36:30 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

This map?

U.S. Gasoline Requirements
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/GFM/Files/US_Gasoline_Map.pdf

Also see:

Refined Products Pipeline
http://images.pennnet.com/mapsearch/ref_pipe.jpg


46 posted on 04/27/2009 4:58:03 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

That’s the one, thanks!


47 posted on 04/27/2009 5:10:25 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson