Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bar Owner, Employees Sue Officers (NM-filmed liquor agents hassling patrons leaving the bar)
The Albuquerque Journal ^ | April 20, 2009 | T.J. Wilham

Posted on 04/20/2009 12:03:50 PM PDT by CedarDave

A bar owner and two employees who were detained, handcuffed and thrown in jail for filming state alcohol enforcement agents outside the Distillery in Downtown Albuquerque have filed a federal lawsuit against the officers.

Jacob Traub, David Garcia and Lance Gomez were charged with a felony count of obstructing the administration of the Liquor Control Act, but the Bernalillo County District Attorney's Office never pursued charges stemming from the May 2006 incident.

~~ snip ~~

According to the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court earlier this month Traub had hired Garcia, a professional videographer, to tape police near his establishment — which he describes as a "restaurant, tavern and entertainment venue." ...

Kennedy said Traub has had problems with Special Investigations Division agents stopping his customers as they walk out of his bar. That's why he hired Garcia to record them. According to state officials, the tavern has been cited seven times since 2006, mostly for serving intoxicated patrons. ...

On May 20, 2006, Albuquerque police and DPS agents were checking identification and giving breath alcohol tests to people they suspected were underage on a Central Avenue sidewalk when Garcia started taping them.

An unidentified DPS agent approached Garcia and ordered him to stop taping. Garcia refused, said he was hired to videotape police harassing bar patrons and continued to videotape the agents. Fisher and Belyeu arrested him and confiscated his video equipment.

Gomez, who was the manager of Traub's bar, saw Garcia being arrested and started taping it.

Another unidentified agent ordered Gomez to stop taping. When he refused, he, too, was handcuffed and arrested.

Traub was arrested when he then started videotaping police arresting the other two.

According to court records, the agents acknowledged they arrested the three men because they were videotaping them.

(Excerpt) Read more at abqjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: alcohol; donutwatch; harassment; lping
The men are suing claiming their Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights — which concern unlawful search and seizure and due process — were violated.
1 posted on 04/20/2009 12:03:50 PM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
They are right.

Those agents should be jailed.

2 posted on 04/20/2009 12:06:15 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Ahhh, the good old Socialist Republic of New Mexico makes the news again.


3 posted on 04/20/2009 12:07:08 PM PDT by Concho (01-20-2009--The beginning of an ERROR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
According to court records, the agents acknowledged they arrested the three men because they were videotaping them.

Well then it is very simple. The agents must be fired.

4 posted on 04/20/2009 12:07:28 PM PDT by WayneS (Let's have More Andy Taylors & Fewer Barney Fifes in Law Enforcement!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Arrested while filming from a public sidewalk. The agent’s actions are a good way to chill citizen’s free speech and other rights.


5 posted on 04/20/2009 12:08:08 PM PDT by CedarDave (This space temporarily for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Let the truth be known. If the state wasn’t doing anything illegal than the videos would have been useless anyway.

Tape away.


6 posted on 04/20/2009 12:08:29 PM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT 2006; now living north of Tampa Bay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

False Arrest under Color of Law,
Kidnapping
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Using a Firearm during the Commission of a Crime

25 to Life for every Jack Booted Thug involved


7 posted on 04/20/2009 12:08:58 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demsux

Damn straight. Friggin tyrannical government agancies really rile me up.


8 posted on 04/20/2009 12:09:31 PM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I’d like to read the whole story, but I will not subscribe to the Abq. Journal in order to do so.


9 posted on 04/20/2009 12:09:33 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
Well then it is very simple. The agents must be fired.

Not just fired, but prosecuted.

10 posted on 04/20/2009 12:10:22 PM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

You do not have a reasonable expectation of Privacy when in PUBLIC, or on a Public Street.


11 posted on 04/20/2009 12:10:38 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

That’ll work, too.


12 posted on 04/20/2009 12:12:56 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

You do not need to subscribe. See bottom of linked page “Trial Premium Pass.”


13 posted on 04/20/2009 12:13:40 PM PDT by CedarDave (This space temporarily for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Thanks.


14 posted on 04/20/2009 12:17:33 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave; greyfoxx39

They should also peruse it under the State Constitution, possibly for the following:

Article 2 — Bill of Rights

Sec. 4. [Inherent rights.]
All persons are born equally free, and have certain natural, inherent and inalienable rights, among which are the rights of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of
acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and of seeking and obtaining safety and happiness.

(Violation of liberty, and defending their liberty by making evidence to support their case. Also of seeking/obtaining happiness by stopping the harassment of customers.)

Sec. 10. [Searches and seizures.]
The people shall be secure in their persons, papers, homes and effects, from unreasonable searches and seizures, and no warrant to search any place, or seize any person or thing, shall issue without describing the place to be searched, or the persons or things to be seized, nor without a written showing of probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation.

(Didn’t happen. Period.)

Sec. 18. [Due process; equal protection;
sex discrimination.]
No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law; nor shall any person be denied equal protection of the laws. Equality of rights under
law shall not be denied on account of the sex of any person. (As amended November 7, 1972, effective July 1, 1973).

(They were deprived of their video equipment.)


15 posted on 04/20/2009 12:17:34 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
"You can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride."

(Some) cops know this, and will use it whenever they can.
They will shut you up, if only temporarily, and worry about justifying it later.
16 posted on 04/20/2009 12:21:12 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

And Article 4 (Legislative), section Sec. 25.
Should be brought to their (Judiciary’s) attention, in order to stymie off any sort of political help from that quarter.

[Validating unauthorized official acts; fines against officers, etc.]
No law shall be enacted legalizing the unauthorized or invalid act of any officer, remitting any fine, penalty or judgment against any officer or validating any illegal use of public funds.


17 posted on 04/20/2009 12:25:02 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

Ping


18 posted on 04/20/2009 12:25:42 PM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*CCRKBA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

((Ping))


19 posted on 04/20/2009 12:34:11 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

“Albuquerque police “ = Jack Booted Thugs !!!


20 posted on 04/20/2009 12:37:11 PM PDT by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Thought you might want to see this....I think we will continue to see the little people start fighting back in ways that are available to them. (at least I can hope)


21 posted on 04/20/2009 12:39:10 PM PDT by CSM (Smokers, the most patriotic of Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Full article without having to register..
22 posted on 04/20/2009 1:03:32 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Only after disaster can we be resurrected." -- Tyler Durden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Should point out I was stopped once by the Albuquerque finest, I was doing a rip roaring three miles over the speed limit. That wasn't my line thats what the stupid jerk told me.
23 posted on 04/20/2009 1:07:17 PM PDT by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Thx.

My suspicions were confirmed.
Charges dropped and equipment returned.
Nobody knows what charges/disciplinary actions the officers face.

SOP for thugs.


24 posted on 04/20/2009 1:17:27 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
The Constitution probably supports the ABC officers ~ The 21st Amendment provides: "Section 2. The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.

Section 2 flipped the 10th and 11th amendments on their head when it comes to likker. Whatever the state says is OK when it comes to demon rum. No doubt every state has some law that protects the ABC agents from harrassment, or from being photographed, etc. during the performance of their jobs.

In all other things it's the other way around!

25 posted on 04/20/2009 1:31:53 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I was doing a rip roaring three miles over the speed limit.

In most states, you have to be going at least five over for a ticket.

In Florida, if you're five or less over the limit, they can only give you a warning ticket. Same in Ohio.

26 posted on 04/20/2009 1:34:38 PM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Not APD is this case.


27 posted on 04/20/2009 3:57:08 PM PDT by CedarDave (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; Virginia Ridgerunner; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; ..



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
28 posted on 04/20/2009 7:51:28 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

“Not just fired, but prosecuted.”

At least.


29 posted on 04/21/2009 7:26:56 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CSM
Thought you might want to see this....I think we will continue to see the little people start fighting back in ways that are available to them. (at least I can hope)

Been following this

It's a real tossup whether you are going to be accosted by by the cops or the lesser street gangs while moving around or through Albuquerque and New Mexico.

Frankly, I would rather encounter the less-well-financed-and-armed street gangs like MS-13.

30 posted on 04/21/2009 7:51:16 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson