Posted on 04/13/2009 11:06:05 AM PDT by forkinsocket
Palestinian PM wants Harper to scrap show, claims violation of international law
JERUSALEM–A planned Toronto exhibit of ancient Middle Eastern manuscripts is threatening to plunge Canada, along with the Royal Ontario Museum, into the thick of the long-running conflict between Israelis and Palestinians.
Beginning in June, the ROM will host a six-month exhibit of the famed Dead Sea Scrolls, organized in co-operation with the Israel Antiquities Authority.
But top Palestinian officials this week declared the exhibit a violation of international law and called on Canada to cancel the show.
In letters to Prime Minister Stephen Harper and top executives at the ROM, senior Palestinian officials argue the scrolls – widely regarded as among the great archaeological discoveries of the 20th century – were acquired illegally by Israel when the Jewish state annexed East Jerusalem in 1967.
"The exhibition would entail exhibiting or displaying artifacts removed from the Palestinian territories," said Hamdan Taha, director-general of the archaeological department in the Palestinian Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities.
"I think it is important that Canadian institutions would be responsible and act in accordance with Canada's obligations."
The Palestinians say the planned ROM exhibit violates at least four international conventions or protocols on the treatment of cultural goods that were illegally obtained.
Both Canada and Israel are signatories to all of the agreements, the Palestinians say.
The letter of protest sent this week to Harper was signed by Salam Fayyad, prime minister of the Palestinian Authority and its second-in-command. The letter to the ROM bore the signature of Khouloud Daibes, minister of tourism and antiquities.
"I'm just hearing about this issue," William Thorsell, CEO of the ROM, said yesterday. "I do understand the Palestinians are making an issue of the ownership. But I'm quite certain the scrolls fall within the parameters of the law."
Officials at Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs had no immediate response to the matter when contacted yesterday by the Star.
The scrolls were discovered in 11 caves on the northwestern shore of the Dead Sea, mostly between 1947 and 1956, and their ownership has long been a matter of fierce dispute between Israeli and Palestinian authorities.
"We are the custodians of the Dead Sea Scrolls," said Pnina Shor, head of the artifacts treatment and conservation department at the Israel Antiquities Authority. "As such, we have a right to exhibit them and to conserve them."
Written mostly on parchment and partly on papyrus, the scrolls number about 900 manuscripts in all and mouldered undisturbed for roughly 20 centuries until their accidental discovery in 1947 by a young Bedouin Arab.
The timing of the find all but coincided with the establishment of Israel as an independent state and struck a deeply resonant chord among Jews, for the scrolls themselves, as well as their content and their origins, seemed to confirm an ancient Jewish bond with the Holy Land, reaching back to the destruction of the second Jewish temple in 70 AD – and beyond.
"The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls represents a turning point in the study of the history of the Jewish people in ancient times," explains a passage of text on the website of the Israel Museum, which nowadays provides a permanent home for the scrolls, "for never before has such a literary treasure of such magnitude come to light."
The caves containing the scrolls were located near Qumran, in what is now the Palestinian West Bank.
Beginning in 1947, and for nearly a decade, experts from the Rockefeller Museum in East Jerusalem, the Jordanian Department of Antiquities, and the École biblique et archéologique française excavated the caves and salvaged the scrolls, only a few of which were found whole. The rest were scattered into thousands of fragments.
Written mainly in Hebrew, and partly in Aramaic and Greek, the scrolls include about 200 copies of portions of the Jewish Bible.
At first, the scrolls were housed in the Rockefeller Museum in East Jerusalem, which was under Jordanian control at the time.
After the 1967 Six Day War, however, Israel unilaterally absorbed the eastern sections of the city, an act most Western nations – including Canada – regard as illegal under international law. The Israelis removed the scrolls from East Jerusalem and took them to the western city, where they remain.
According to Shor at the Israel Antiquities Authority, portions of the scrolls frequently have been put on display in other countries – including the United States, Britain, Switzerland, Germany, and Australia – over the past 10 years or so.
The protest to Canada may be a test case for the Palestinians.
"This issue has never been raised, so far as I know, in the past," said Thorsell.
The Palestinians say the scrolls are among "millions" of artifacts Israel has removed illegally from Palestinian territory since 1967.
The planned exhibition at the ROM is called the Dead Sea Scrolls: Words that Changed the World. It is set to run from June 27 to Jan. 3.
Sorry, but letting the French and Canadians rescue their people first, without negotiations no less and no offers of ransom given, does not equal a big win on the high sea.
Ya know,,,, if the palis ever came into actual possession of the scrolls, they would destroy them in some obscene way.
Everything palestinians or islamics touch comes up smelling like manure.
Whose property were the Dead Sea Scrolls originally? The Arabs can claim they deserve ownership because of where the scrolls were found, but doesn’t the original ownership trump that?
The Dead Sea Scrolls herald the history of the Jews. They were written by the Jewish people. It seems to me they should be the property of the Jews, no matter where they were found.
What vested interest do the Arabs have in ownership of these materials? If they were to have them would we expect them to treat the scrolls better than they did Joseph’s tomb?
Some people are just vile. And the claims made this time are more evidence of it IMO.
Such utter crap.
Unilaterally absorbed. As if Jordan didn't deliberately inject themselves into the Arab aggression by signing a defense treaty with Nasser, placing their troops under Egyptian command and massing on the Israeli border, right along with Syria, Iraq and Egypt. As if Jordan didn't subsequently attack West Jerusalem FROM East Jerusalem (or from at least close proximity in the West Bank). And as if Israel didn't capture it after responding to said attacks.
And let's review how each respective govt handled their respective control - when Jordan captured East Jerusalem in 1948, they expelled all the Jews, destroyed their homes and all the synagogues and razed cemeteries. When Israel captured East Jerusalem in 1967, they returned control of the Temple Mt to Jordan, maintained religious freedom for all (except of course the Jews on the Temple Mt) and offered full citizenship to Arab residents. Oh wait, they did destroy a market in front of the Western Wall (my bad) and - gasp - built a security wall.
So sick of pro-Arab media with its range of subtlety to overt bias. And if it were any other country in the entire world, there would be no dispute - they would have been GIFTED with scrolls in their language reflecting their faith. But it's Israel, so it's through the looking glass we go.
Well of course. Just like they did with Joseph’s Tomb (destroyed) and anything found during excavation under the Temple Mount (left in garbage dumps amid denials that any Jewish temple ever existed there), and the mass destruction of ancient graves on the Mt of Olives from 1948. Oh and speaking of cemeteries, let’s not forget the one they planted in front of the sealed (also by Muslims) Eastern Gate so as to hinder the eventual entrance of Messiah.
And their claim that both Jewish and Christian scripture has been “corrupted” and that Mohammed landed with his winged horse onto the Temple Mount, when in reality the Koran never mentions Jerusalem a single time. It makes one wonder if the only other book they have is 1984 and the only western TV they watch is old SNL when Jon Lovitz is on as the Pathological Liar, it’s that absurd.
Harper will not cave on this.
Agreed.
Thank God.
Ping
Let them pound sand.
No pun intended.
|
|
|||
Gods |
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. |
||
|
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
|||
"By March 12, 2001, these giant Buddhas have been destroyed by the use of mortars, dynamite, tanks, anti-aircraft weapons and rockets. Now they are nothing but piles of sandstone rubble and clay plaster. The Taleban destroyed also other buddhist images in Afghanistan, such as ancient statues and relief carvings.
"The Buddhist, the world community and UNESCO, failed to convince the Talebans to leave such artifacts and everybody expressed horror at the Buddhas' destruction.
I suppose this means the Temple Mount must be returned to Israeli control since it was taken illegally by force
"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism."
PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein, March 31, 1977
Nothing has really changed since 1977.
Indeed, nothing's changed since May, 1948.
What exactly ia a "palestine?"
Sorry SHB: They certainly are Germain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.