PING!
Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.
Posted on 04/11/2009 4:41:00 AM PDT by euram
After Gov. Sarah Palin's selection of a new justice for the Alaska Supreme Court last month proved controversial, the governor agreed to a live interview about the process of picking judges. We sent the governor a few general questions in advance. Then she decided to answer in writing. Here's what she wrote:
(Excerpt) Read more at community.adn.com ...
Wow, what a concept. Perhaps more politicians should consider doing the same.
((ping))
ADN: Are you frustrated by the current process?
Palin: No system for selecting judges is perfect. [Electing Governor appoints and Senate Confirms Nominations by a Judicial Council and Governor appoints] The system we have is the one set up by our Constitution. We have to work within that framework and it has produced some very good judges. But there may be reasonable steps that could be taken to improve it.
Some candidates have expressed the opinion that the process and use of the bar poll is unfair. This bar poll allows anonymous comments, just like anonymous blog comments, to judge candidates. It’s hard, if not impossible, for candidates to respond to or research anonymous accusations being leveled against them. This is unfair to the candidate and ultimately to Alaskans if qualified candidates end up not being nominated because of inaccurate anonymous comments.
Another concern was that attorneys filling out a bar poll can state that their comments are based on actual experiences with the candidate, which could mean their comments carry more weight with the judicial council. Recent candidates have commented there was no way they had interacted with the number of attorneys that made this claim in their bar poll. But because it is anonymous, they cannot correct the results.
Finally, it’s been reported that the judicial council uses the bar poll as a litmus test. That candidates are told their bar poll score was low and so they stand very little chance of being nominated by the judicial council. Again, if the bar poll process has flaws, it could be preventing some qualified candidates from being nominated.
ADN: Did you consider rejecting both of the latest candidates for the Supreme Court?
Palin: My job is to follow the Constitution. I try to appoint the nominee that is able to approach every case with an open mind and the best knowledge, skills, and ability to analyze the legal issues and apply the law to the facts of the case. It is often a difficult decision to make. In the instance of the most recent Supreme Court seat, both candidates had a wealth of legal experience to offer the state.
ADN: I’d like to know if you intend to look into changing the process, and what that might look like.
Palin: Staff will review the process and if there is a reasonable way to reduce or eliminate the use of anonymous comments, I would suggest that be discussed with the Judicial Council.
ADN: Did you anticipate your selection of Morgan Christen being controversial?
Palin: Virtually every leadership decision I make is viewed as controversial by somebody. It is no different when selecting a nominee to appoint to a judicial position.
Some in a group called the Alaska Family Council were off-base with a knee jerk reaction to my decision; I believe they learned some things through this process. We had a lot of positive comments submitted for both candidates; individual personal experiences with these candidates were shared (and those who commented signed their names, I’ll add). I respect Alaskans’ voices on these appointments, and I welcome their input. Ultimately, while my views may not run parallel with any judge I’ve selected, I am confident that I selected a justice who will be an asset to the bench and to Alaskans.
ADN: What were your main considerations in making the appointment?
Palin: As mentioned above, I look for the nominee that is able to approach every case with an open mind and the best knowledge, skills, and ability to analyze the legal issues and apply the law to the facts of the case. It was my opinion that Judge Christen was the most qualified nominee. At the same time, I respect Judge Smith.
ADN: Did you ask about Planned Parenthood or abortion?
Palin: I do not have litmus tests or litmus questions for judicial appointments. Of her own volition, Judge Christen was open about her time on the Planned Parenthood board and offered her perspective. Judge Christen has always been a strong advocate for adoption, and she joined the organization to promote the issue statewide. During her time on the Planned Parenthood Board, it was the only one in the nation that did not perform abortions. Additionally, while she was on the board, she successfully championed the inclusion of the Crisis Pregnancy Center under the United Way donation umbrella. Letters we received supported this. The reaction of the Alaska Family Council was a bit of a surprise to me, but they must not have had the benefit of all the information about Judge Christen as I did.
PING!
Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.
Agree but it would put 90% of the liberals in D.C. out of a job and that would be a good thing.
Palin’s responses were just fine. “My job is to follow the Constitution.” Hoorah! But why’s she hafta flipflop on the interview? Agreed to talk, but, after seeing advance questions, is suddenly more interested in playing text-tag. Last-minute opt-outs like that just add more blood to the water and keep the sharks circling. Not impressed, that’s me.
If you want to see Palin unscripted and really live, check out the 30-minute wide-ranging press conference in her Juneau office yesterday. The video is posted over at C4P. No teleprompter, no prepared text...it's great.
Sarah (SarahPAC) could not have spun this better. Good to know our Gov. is just another politician reading the polls and governing accordingly. She had a choice, she chose an extreme abortion supporting judge. I have become disappointed that many of those on the right will drink the personality cult kool aid so willingly (just like the left).
So sell us on your candidate Smith, she chose from the only two that she could and you clearly wanted her to choose the other one.
Sell us on why Smith was the better choice.
Better to get your point across with well thought out statements than to get caught in a previously designed verbal minefield. It was a wise decision.
Sarah Palin wrote “I do not have litmus tests or litmus questions for judicial appointments”.
Why do Republican politicians insist on saying this over and over?
Certain past court decisions, like Roe vs. Wade, have not been Constitutional.
Recognizing that those decisions have not been Constitutional and thus being willing to overturn them absolutely should be a litmus test for judicial appointees.
Better for Palin to get her point across with well thought out statements than to get caught in a previously designed verbal minefield? If that was a wise decision, I’d say she’d have been even wiser to start from there, rather than to agree to an interview and later disagree with herself’s own decision.
My guess is is that they try to make themselves look better than the left which has all kinds of litmus tests, abortion being the biggest one, gay rights, diversity, on and on. It doesn’t work out well. The public ignores the lefts litmus tests, and doesn’t care if the right has them or not.
Reagan gave us Sandra Day O’Connor, because he didn’t have a litmus test either, and look how that turned out. It seems to me that most judges appointed by republicans eventually end up center left.
False.
Either you are misinformed or knowingly lying. She had the choice between a extreme leftist Smith and a moderate Morgan who was member of a predecessor to the Alaska PP 10 years before they started providing abortions. She is not "extremely abortion supporting" but a strong adoption advocate. She left the organization before it was about abortions.
The prolife organisation initially opposed to Morgan retracted their criticism, and told that Smith would be no better.
Worse than those who are part of the "personality cult" are those who lie against better knowledge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.