Posted on 03/20/2009 8:20:21 AM PDT by outlawjake
Then why do you keep repeating the line over and over "..choosing someone from a cult to run your PAC is another... You seem to not mind promoting the bearing of false witness against this person. Not much difference in my book (if not worse as there may be a planned willingness) than 'hiring someone from a cult'.
again I am not new, have been on site since sore-loserman.. just changed names as I lost password..
anyway.. I like Sarah a lot.., she is definitely my #1 choice for 2012..
No, the point is you didn’t read the flow of the thread and you deliberately misunderstood what I wrote.
Learn a little discernment before you attack your fellow Freeper like a pit bull over NOTHING.
I completely agree, just find it interesting how some people try to continue to promote it.. the ‘bearing of false witness’ by these folks is far worse than the charge leveled against Palin.
Yes, they do think we’re that stupid! They’re in for a rude awakening though...
Scientology is a bar bet that got out of hand.
You were mistaken the first time... then you were corrected... then you repeated the falsehood... which means you’re lying now.
SARAH PALIN DID NOT HIRE A SCIENTOLOGIST TO RUN HER PAC. IT’S NOT TRUE.
Hope that clears it up for you.
Oh please. On that basis Judas would have NEVER had contact with The Nazarene. And yet, in the over all plan and scheme of things that was exactly what God had in mind. Since when are you soooo smart that you know the whole of God’s plan for each and every person and situation?
He's also a big-time, scumbag, ambulance chaser as in the Dow Chemical leak in India. He was the first lawyer who parachuted in and signed up the victims to sue Dow.
He's also not working for Sarah.
Perhaps like those of your fellow Christians. On your theory The Nazarene should not have had a meal with the tax man nor should he have healed the leper
.....I feel strongly that even if he were on her PAC that it would be okay because it doesnt change the position of her heart. Just sayin.
That’s what I was responding to. The potentiality of something like this I would NOT be comfortable with and neither should any truly born again Christian who knows the dangers that can result by working with cultists over something so important to your life or profession. Personal acquaintances, fine, that’s not too intimate. But something more professional would definitely be concerning.
Frankly I am more concerned about the current story that Sarah Palin has refused only 30% of the porkulus bill money for Alaska. Why not 100%? If she wants to run for President you KNOW the liberals will throw that in her face in future. “You took 70% of the porkulus money for Alaska. You are a hypocrite.”
eww.. that may be worse than being a scientologist..
He was not hired.. also hope he is not helping to run it on a volunteer basis..
Look in the mirror, dearie, you are a pit bull attacking someone else for your own faults.
A bar bet between Hubbard, Aleister Crowley and Jack Parsons that turned into a global satanic cult.
As for discernment, that is funny, who knee jerked to the original story then continued to repeat the false charge?
I think that’s the problem with Freepers like Kansas who deliberately misunderstand another Freeper’s posts about the dangers of Scientology. They react in knee jerk fashion like a typical unsaved liberal, instead of pausing and thinking before they respond.
It's 50% and it is only 50% because Alaska is almost 70% federal land and the remaining 50% was part tied to maintenance for federal land that was already contracted. (IE, the feds keeping up land and contracts they already had).. there was a very detailed analysis done..
Again, I already expressed my relief the story was false, but you keep responding as if I didn’t. You are the liar, not me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.