Posted on 03/20/2009 8:20:21 AM PDT by outlawjake
She IS a troll.
She has NEVER said anything positive about any conservative, she has been on several threads trying to plant doubt about Palin.
Yes, we can all tolerate differences in opinion, at least most of us can.
I will not tolerate dishonesty, and this particular troll has been outed as very dishonest.
I’m going to give her the benefit of the doubt and say it is probably just pride.. she convinced herself of something and would be damned if she admitted she was wrong, she had to keep the line going.. even if it was bearing false witness.
Kansas, I don’t know her posting history- But, “sowing seeds of doubt” about Gov. Palin does not a troll make. She may merely be a Freeper who doesn’t support Palin. Nothing wrong with that.
For instance, yesterday,I posted a thread on mark Sanford-because I wanted to discuss his message. You can review the thread. You’ll see that some who support Gov. Palin thrashed Sanford for various reasons, among them, he’s not “conservative”. Imo, that’s a ridiculous claim.
But, people who are pro-Palin and anti-Sanford, are not trolls. They merely support Palin over Sanford; and vice versa. I happen to think well of both of them.
It may not be your intent, but I have noticed that some toss out the word “troll” to intimidate. In my view, that might succeed in suppressing criticism; but I don’t think that’s positve.
I’d rather hear the criticism and have a chance to address it- You seem savvy and capable- I doubt anyone on this Board is going to subvert your views. Just defeat her in the arena of ideas.
She does NOT claim to actually support anyone.
She makes false claims about “supporting” Palin.
It is her clumsy and dishonest presentation that bother me, not her choice of candidates.
She has NEVER said ANYTHING positive, that I can find, about any Republican.
My friend, she’s been on the board since 2003. Are you saying she’s been laying in wait for 6 years to turn the board against Gov. Palin? LOL Like a Manchurian Freeper. -:)
I’m joking. For myself, I’ve encountered posters who I disagee with, and I try to engage in a dialogue. Sometimes, I realize it’s fruitless- so I go on. It’s no big deal.
As I indicated, my sole point is I’ve witnessed what I consider “bullying” with this troll issue. And frankly, for those who ardently support one candidate, I would respectfully suggest that it’s really counterproductive to their candidate because it builds resentment.
And its my impression, that’s what you might be seeing here.
Well, take it for what it’s worth.
Hey, it could be worse, at least she isn’t one of those who are trashing Palin simply because she is a woman and doesn’t want women in power. I’ve seen some posters who have actually made comments like ‘we don’t need a winking woman, we need a MAN to run’..
Those are the worst anti-Palin posters..
:->
post #16 here..
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2190290/posts?page=39
“..I really think we need a strong conservative man at the top of the ticket next time to go one on one with Obama, someone who is articulate and without any personal baggage in their family...”
actually, she MIGHT be one of those!
Oh my.. (I didn’t add the emphasis)
also in the same thread #52-
We need a strong articulate conservative MAN at the head of the ticket to go one on one with Obama.
..and #59
If you want to defeat Obama put up a strong personable articulate MALE conservative (without any family problems or scandals) who can go head to head with him in a debate without the winks and the “say it ain’t so” female gimmicks.
I will answer your question as it stands for me.
I am a Republican. I believe in the U.S. Constitution.
I have a huge problem with the way the Democrats are trampling over the Constitution. The latest Tax The Bonus scheme really irritates me.
I am upset at our system that can’t seem to make a person running for President actually prove he is eligible...this is a disaster in the making in the world of terrorism (if it isn’t already..)
I don’t like Al Sharpton who cries Racism when people dare to question Black people about a subject.
I have the same problem with Scientologists and their proponents who cry bigot when you dare question their abuses.
So, what does all of that have to do with Palin.
If a supposed Conservative Republican hires an advisor who practices a religion that has forced abortions, labor abuses, and has received special dispensation from the IRS in violation of the US Constitution...then her judgement is of question to me as well as the influence Scientology will have over her. This is especially true when I know that the “RELIGION” practices Fair Game.
Her supposed advisor (paid or unpaid) gets a special tax deduction that no other religion can get..and a former IRS commissioner has flat out said that because of this favored status most taxpayers are treated unfairly. It violates the Establishment Clause.
Fair Game as practiced by the Religion of her Advisor:
ENEMY — SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.
See what they did to Paulette Cooper - a woman born in the Auschwitz Concentration Camp. Google Operation Freak Out.
I absolutely will not vote for her if she hooks up with a Scientologist.
Wow... fascinating thread from the past, who’d think that freepers would ever stick up for Scientologists?????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.