Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Jefferson and his contemporaries were not natural-born citizens as understood by themselves, the Framers.

Which is what I said, and which you found so amusing.

No. Actually, you did not. You continue to confuse the adjectives natural born and native-born, which would be amusing if it weren't annoying. I have previously posted and analyzed the Oxford English Dictionary entries for these phrases. And you basically said that the OED is irrelevant and you know better that these phrases both mean the same thing which is nothing.

ML/NJ

483 posted on 03/18/2009 10:03:20 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj
No. Actually, you did not. You continue to confuse the adjectives natural born and native-born, which would be amusing if it weren't annoying. I have previously posted and analyzed the Oxford English Dictionary entries for these phrases.

And you're confusing your opinion with reality. Reality is that the Constitution identifies two classes of citizen, not three. For that matter, U.S. law identifies two classes, various court decisions identify two classes, and your rather amusing theory doesn't change that. If you are not a natural born citizen then you're naturalized, simple as that.

486 posted on 03/18/2009 10:08:07 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson