[Charles Martel]

Corsi isn’t too clear on this point, though. The article speaks more to the “North American Union” designs than to what would constitute a “dual” country. To me, that’s a civil war/secession reference, but Corsi’s article doesn’t appear to touch on that. Admittedly, I just skimmed the second half.

[Roccus]

I got the impression that he purposely left the civil war/secession angle out. Sort of an implied 'raised eyebrow.'

But then again, I've had a lot of coffee this AM.

};^)