Skip to comments.
Embryo screening should be mandatory (For Diseases)
Genetic Future ^
| March 6, 2009
| Daniel MacArthur
Posted on 03/06/2009 11:18:15 AM PST by GOPGuide
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: theBuckwheat
This is pure evil:
Doctor "No, you don't have to have your baby terminated, but you know the ramifications right. Your baby will never be able to receive health care benefits and the birth will not be covered by your benefits. And we will have to enter you into the God baby database.
21
posted on
03/06/2009 11:59:24 AM PST
by
Scythian
To: TurtleUp
There was an article in the Guardian not long ago where a normal healthy boy was born to a couple who was advised to abort based on a positive Down's screening.
22
posted on
03/06/2009 11:59:53 AM PST
by
MrB
(The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
To: TurtleUp
HIV screening tests have a false positive rate of 0.06%-0.12%.
Mandell, Bennett, & Dolin: Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 6th ed.
23
posted on
03/06/2009 12:15:13 PM PST
by
CholeraJoe
(Tagline removed under court order)
To: GOPGuide
Can’t have any imperfect people, now, can we? /s
24
posted on
03/06/2009 7:41:43 PM PST
by
SuziQ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson